Liquidity lost

From the New York Times:

Unsold Homes Tie Down Would-Be Transplants

Dr. Michele Morgan migrated last fall from Detroit to Phoenix, taking a job as a psychiatrist. She expected her husband, Sam Kirkland, to soon join her, since he was accepting an early retirement package from his employer, General Motors. But he cannot move, he says, because he has not been able to sell the four-bedroom family home.

“As things now stand,” said Mr. Kirkland, who is 51 and intends to seek work in Phoenix, if he ever gets there, “my wife might decide to give up her job in Phoenix and come back to Detroit for a while, until we can sell the house.”

The rapid decline in housing prices is distorting the normal workings of the American labor market. Mobility opens up job opportunities, allowing workers to go where they are most needed. When housing is not an obstacle, more than five million men and women, nearly 4 percent of the nation’s work force, move annually from one place to another — to a new job after a layoff, or to higher-paying work, or to the next rung in a career, often the goal of a corporate transfer. Or people seek, as in Dr. Morgan’s case, an escape from harsh northern winters.

Now that mobility is increasingly restricted. Unable to sell their homes easily and move on, tens of thousands of people like Mr. Kirkland and Dr. Morgan are making the labor force less flexible just as a weakening economy puts pressure on workers to move to wherever companies are still hiring.

“You hear a lot about foreclosure and the thousands of families who are being forced out,” said Joseph S. Tracy, director of research at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “But that is swamped by the number of people who want to sell their homes and can’t.”

This entry was posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Liquidity lost

  1. MS says:

    If you read the article you see that they want $200,000 for the house (and it’s a really nice older house), but that a “similar home nearby recently sold for $90,000”.(and it sounds like a nice neighborhood, esp. because both are professionals – the wife is a psychiatrist)
    Can you imagine trying to sell such a home in NJ for $200,000 or less? People would be standing in line to buy that house. Such prices are unimaginable here. Our ideas of fair prices are soooo distorted/different from much of the rest of the country.

  2. Rob says:

    Is this how we start to paint the Great Bagholder Bailout as a public good? I guess I need to get a Constitutional law book so I can find out if the general welfare clause was written with real estate speculators in mind.

  3. KenL says:

    The bottom will be in if ,and when we see 5.1/2 30 yr mtg,and not before .But it will be a L not a V bottom .At that rate it makes more sense to buy than rent .however all bets are off if we see a very bad recession Corzine gets reelected Gov

Comments are closed.