From the Asbury Park Press:
Mix of housing styles paves way to healthy economy
Mixed-use communities and density are tickets to providing the economic stability our state needs. The alternative is continuing high housing prices, continued sprawl, people leaving the state for places where they can afford a home and businesses following the workers. Most of us know someone who has done that. Many of us are thinking about it.
Our nation and state are growing. Although our state’s growth is slowing, we still expect to add another million people in the next decade. The issue isn’t whether it happens, but how we handle it.
We have two choices: Continue past development patterns that contribute to sprawl while consuming open space, an approach that will continue to give us long commutes, sky-high housing costs, high taxes and the migration of businesses and tax ratables. Or we can adapt new ideas put forth by organizations like the Urban Land Institute, Rutgers University, New Jersey Future, the Regional Planning Partnership, the State Planning Commission, Homes for New Jersey and the Sierra Club.
…
Families are changing and no longer are looking for the traditional four-bedroom home. A quarter of all homebuyers are young professionals, childless couples, empty-nesters and single-parent households. When the National Association of Realtors asked people if they would prefer large-lot subdivisions or higher-density mixed-use communities, 60 percent preferred the mixed-use community.Nobody claims these communities eliminate the need for cars. They do, however, downplay the automobile and bring in retail. People can walk to the corner for milk or a haircut. Along the way, they might run into neighbors. That adds to a sense of community, something lacking in neighborhoods today.
These communities need less infrastructure, so they cost less to build and require fewer dollars to maintain and service. That means lower taxes or more money to spend on other services.
…
New Jersey has a severe housing shortage and affordability crisis perpetuated by a regulatory environment and outdated attitudes that block innovative planning. Those attitudes make it difficult to intelligently discuss how best to provide homes while preserving open space. If we don’t solve our housing problems, people will continue to leave the state for more affordable places. Businesses will follow and our economy will deteriorate. That will leave the rest of us to pay more taxes and receive fewer services.
From the Trenton Times:
Different approach to transit villages
From the Star Ledger:
Now in Morristown, a wait for the hum of construction
The clamor of construction was supposed to have started by now at sites across Morristown.
But five long-anticipated building projects — adding some 600 homes as well as new businesses — have run into obstacles ranging from the real estate downturn and a developer’s bankruptcy to litigation and a dispute over union labor, according to local officials.
…
The delays have struck the transit village of some 210 apart ments near the train station, as well as smaller-scale plans on Court Street, on Morris Street and at historic Willow Hall. The town’s biggest redevelopment project — about 250 homes and a retail complex at the former Epstein’s department store — also could face delays if the town and developers don’t agree on how much of the construction will be done by union workers.
Hear hear, smart growth is the way to go.
New Jersey need to change the way it does things and get away from its provincial mentality. There are lots of urban built up environments that function well and provide pleasant places to live – Montreal is a great example of once suburban urban development.