Can’t live in one, can’t live without one

From MarketWatch:

Mortgages are unaffordable in half of America’s largest housing markets

Owning a home is becoming an increasingly unaffordable proposition in many of the largest metropolitan areas across the U.S.

In more than half of the nation’s 35 largest markets, buying a typical home listed for sale now requires a greater share of income than the median-valued home entailed historically, according to a new report from real estate website Zillow. Californians have it worst when it comes to home loan affordability. Mortgage payments as a share of income are higher in Los Angeles than in any other major city — for a typical property, these payments would eat up 46.8% of the median income. Historically, loan payments only represented 35.2% of median incomes for owners in the City of Angels.

Not far behind are San Francisco and San Jose, where mortgage payments represent 40.2% and 39.3% of median income respectively. Meanwhile, at the other end of the spectrum, home owners in the Midwest and Rust Belt states must devote a far smaller share of their income to mortgage payments. In St. Louis, Pittsburgh and Cleveland, loan payments represent roughly 13% of median income.

Nationally, homeowners must spend a fifth of their income in mortgage payments for the typical home on average — roughly in line with historical levels. But things could soon get worse, said Zillow chief economist Svenja Gudell.

Posted in Economics, National Real Estate | 43 Comments

Escalades and Jet Skis … Baby!

From HousingWire:

Homeowner equity soars in first quarter

Homeowner equity increased significantly in the first quarter of 2017, according to the Q1 2017 home equity analysis from CoreLogic, a property information, analytics and data-enabled solutions provider.

Homeowners with a mortgage, about 63% of all homeowners, saw their equity increase by 11.2% a total of $766.4 billion since the first quarter last year. The average homeowner gained about $13,400 in equity over the last year.

The total number of mortgaged residential properties with negative equity decreased 3% from the fourth quarter to 3.1 million homes, or 6.1% of all mortgaged properties. This is a drop of 24% from 4.1 million homes in the first quarter last year.

“One million borrowers achieved positive equity over the last year, which means mortgage risk continues to steadily decline as a result of increasing home prices,” CoreLogic Chief Economist Frank Nothaft said. “Pockets of concern remain with markets such as Miami, Las Vegas and Chicago, which are the top three for negative equity among large metros, with each recording a negative equity share at least twice or more the national average.”

Posted in Economics, Mortgages, National Real Estate | 85 Comments

Ah the good old days

From NPR – All Things Considered:

Before Silicon Valley, New Jersey Reigned As Nation’s Center Of Innovation

People from New Jersey are used to defending their state.

But, in fact, New Jersey has a history to brag about. Thomas Edison invented the light bulb, the phonograph and the movie camera there. Many decades later, Bell Labs invented the transistor in the state.

Geography favored New Jersey. On one end, it borders New York City, and on the other end is Philadelphia. That means easy access to Wall Street financing, transportation and industry headquarters.

It all started in the 18th century, when Alexander Hamilton took one look at the plunging Passaic River waterfall in Paterson and his eyes lit up with dreams of industry. That came true for silk, textiles and locomotives. Then in 1870, a smart young inventor named Thomas Edison set up shop in Newark.

“The things that make it attractive for Edison are the things that kind of make it attractive for a lot of aspiring people who come to New Jersey today,” says Leonard DeGraaf, an archivist at the Thomas Edison National Historical Park in West Orange, N.J.

“Edison has the resources,” DeGraaf adds. “He could live and work anywhere, and the fact that he decides to stay in New Jersey I think says something about how he perceived New Jersey as a good place for him to set up laboratories and build companies and manufacture his inventions.”

That’s what made it attractive to Bell Labs. It spread out over several sites in the middle of the state and created many of the technologies that paved the way for 20th century inventions. One of its former facilities, which once held 6,000 engineers and researchers, is in the suburb of Holmdel.

“We perfected cellular communications in this building,” says Edward Eckert, a Bell Labs corporate archivist. “Even before this building was built, we used this property for wireless research — transatlantic radio, telephone, microwave.”

And not too far from there a group of Bell Lab scientists discovered the transistor — the root technology of all silicon chips.

So why didn’t Silicon Valley rise up in New Jersey? Johns Hopkins professor Stuart Leslie, who studies the history of science and technology, says it should have.

“If you were going to place a bet on whether it was going to be New Jersey or Northern California and you placed that bet, say, in 1950, where would you put your money?” Leslie says. “You’d obviously put it on New Jersey.”

But a migration happened west because, as Leslie puts it, the East Coast had become “insular, isolated, self-contained.”

Some cultural differences were also shaped by the law. New Jersey has strict anti-competitive laws that make it hard to take what you learn at your job and create a new company. William Shockley, one of those brilliant Nobel laureates who invented the transistor, moved to California to open his lab in Mountain View, the current home of Google. His employees also left to found their own companies.

It’s not entirely fair to say innovation has vanished from the Garden State. New Jersey ranks 11th among the 50 states for tech industry employment, according to tech association CompTIA. But the excitement and experimentation surrounding Silicon Valley is but a whisper in New Jersey.

There’s a lesson in what happened to New Jersey. Technology centers can shift and change. Bell Labs rested on its laurels; maybe it was a little smug. Nothing lasts forever. Smugness is not a New Jersey exclusive.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 65 Comments

Slowdown ahead?

From CNBC:

Fast-rising home prices finally hit a wall

This spring may be one of the hottest sellers’ markets in history, but even off-the-chart-demand can’t put every potential buyer in a home of their own.

If the house is too expensive for the region’s demand, it won’t sell. That is becoming the case in more and more neighborhoods this spring — and is likely behind the first sign that big price gains are starting to shrink.

Home values rose a healthy 6.9 percent in April compared with April 2016, according to a new report from CoreLogic, but that is a drop from the 7.1 percent annual gain in March and the 7 percent gain in February. CoreLogic is also lowering its predictions for annual gains, to 5.1 percent in April 2018.

“I think we are beginning to see it in selected markets,” said Frank Nothaft, CoreLogic’s chief economist. “You just can’t have house prices grow at 7 percent year after year, when income growth is 2-3 percent a year.”

The evidence is clearest in the hottest markets, like San Francisco, where April home sales were at their slowest pace in six years. The median price hit another new record, but the annual gains are shrinking. Adjusting for inflation, however, San Francisco home prices are still 7 percent below their peak in June 2006.

The higher end of the market is seeing price gains cool the most, because supply there is higher. Both Manhattan and Miami Beach have huge supplies of newly built condominiums, and slower sales are hitting prices. Even in tonier suburbs, the million-dollar-plus homes are sitting longer with more and more price reductions.

Nationally, home prices are reacting to the severe lack of homes for sale, especially on the low end of the market. Demand is heavy, but there is a limit that is slowly being reached in certain markets and even certain neighborhoods. In Washington state, where the supply of homes for sale is at the lowest on record, home prices are up 12 percent annually. In Connecticut, where employment is weakening and major companies have relocated to other states, home supplies are high and prices basically flat.

Those are the extremes. Back in the middle, it’s the same story of short supply and strong demand. If mortgage rates finally do move higher, as some have been predicting, affordability will weaken further. Demand will simply come up against math.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, National Real Estate | 113 Comments

Shaping up to be the strongest year yet?

From CBS News:

House-hunting in 2017? You’ll need a fatter wallet

What’s on your TV? In many middle-class homes, programs about house-hunting now compete for viewers with sporting events, cooking shows and financial advice. Americans are house-hungry. And nothing proves this more than the latest figures from Black Knight’s Home Price Appreciation (HPA) index, which in March tallied its highest monthly gain in nearly four years.

“By the end of March, prices were already up 2.3 percent since the start of the year, and we hadn’t even gotten into the prime homebuying season yet,” said Ben Graboske, chief technology officer for this Jacksonville, Florida-based financial services company. The pricing “acceleration” is broad-based, with 36 out of 50 states seeing it since the year started. Spring and early summer are the biggest seasons for home buying.

Everyone agrees that home prices are rising, and that the cost of buying is increasing far faster than new homes can be built. Just two months ago, National Association of Realtors (NAR) Economist Lawrence Yun predicted a 4 percent increase in home sale prices this year. Yun has now upped his expectation to 5 percent.

Is anything wrong with this scenario? Not if you’re a home seller. The economics of scarcity is on your side. “The number of homes on the market fell yet again in April, declining another 8.7 percent from last year,” said Chief Economist Ralph McLaughlin of Trulia, which provides real estate listings and housing data. “Simply put, homebuyers are gobbling up inventory at a much higher rate than in the past. The most recent numbers show that the share of inventory that sells has climbed to 25 percent.”

Not only are homes selling faster, but new home construction hasn’t kept pace with demand. Trulia estimates that for the market to “look normal,” construction of new homes would have to double. In April, new home sales were only about 12 percent of total sales. The historical average is just below a quarter of all sales.

How far will their budgets stretch? According to Yun, income has risen 10 percent in the last five years, but housing prices have climbed 40 percent during that time. “That’s a four-to-one ratio between price and income,” he argued. “At some point, we’ll see a leveling off.”

Not immediately, said Black Knight. Even though interest rates are slowly inching upward, “homes are still affordable from a historic perspective,” said Graboske. It now takes almost 23 percent of Americans’ median income to cover the monthly cost of a median-priced home, which is still below the peak of 35 percent of income required in 2006, and not quite the pre-crisis average of 27 percent from 2000 to 2005.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 136 Comments

Refis down, foreclosures down, purchases down

From DSNews:

First-time Foreclosure Starts Hit All-time Low

Both mortgage originations and foreclosures are in freefall, according to the recent Mortgage Monitor report released by Black Knight Financial Services on Monday. Overall originations dropped 34 percent over the first quarter of the year, while foreclosure starts hit a 12-year low of just 52,800.

Though purchase loans and refinances took a hit during Q1, refis saw the steepest drop, falling 45 percent since the end of 2016 and 20 percent over the last year. According to Ben Graboske, EVP of Data & Analytics at Black Knight, this drop in refinances was no surprise.

“As expected, the decline was most pronounced in the refinance market, which saw a 45 percent decline from Q4 2016 and were down 20 percent from last year,” Graboske said. “They also made up a smaller share of overall originations than in the past; just 45 percent of total Q1 originations were refinances vs. 54 percent in Q4 2016.”

Purchase originations were down 21 percent over the quarter, though up slightly over the year, at 3 percent higher than 2016’s numbers.

“Purchase lending was up year-over-year, but the 3 percent annual growth is a marked decline from Q4 2016’s 12 percent and marks the slowest growth rate Black Knight has observed in more than three years—going back to Q4 2013,” Graboske said. “At that point in time, interest rates had risen abruptly— very similarly to what we saw at the end of 2016—and originations slowed considerably. The same dynamic is at work here.”

As for foreclosures, April marked the lowest month on record for first-time foreclosure starts, with just 24,200 for the month. Repeat foreclosures also dropped, hitting their lowest point since April 2008. The total delinquency rate for the month was 4.08 percent, with foreclosure pre-sale inventory dropping 3.47 percent.

Posted in Economics, Foreclosures, National Real Estate | 23 Comments

Bayonne joins the Gold Coast

From the NY Post:

When Jason Tsay and Michael Suchocki left artsy Chelsea for sleepy Bayonne, they thought the New Jersey city was on the cusp of a real estate renaissance.

Turns out they were a decade early. The couple moved in 2004, but it’s only now that the southernmost area of New Jersey’s Gold Coast is gearing up for thousands of new apartments and game-changing developments.

The modest town (pop. 65,000) at the bottom of the Hudson Waterfront — the stretch of Jersey areas across from Manhattan and Brooklyn that starts in the north with Englewood Cliffs, across the George Washington Bridge, and passes through Hoboken and Jersey City on down to Bayonne — has long held loads of potential.

A harborfront location and city views, easy access to Manhattan via Light Rail and the PATH, an abundant supply of developable land parcels: Bayonne has all the scaffolding for a construction boom. But legal battles, lackluster efforts and economic downturns have hampered its progress, even as neighbors like Jersey City and Hoboken have seen their fortunes soar.

Now, some 13 years after Tsay and Suchocki relocated there, there are signs that Bayonne’s time has at last arrived. The city is in the midst of a dramatic redevelopment of its Military Ocean Terminal, taken out of service in 1999, that will result in a massive rental complex along with retailers like Costco.

Meanwhile, smaller projects are proliferating around the town’s 22nd Street Light Rail stop, which connects residents to points up the Gold Coast and PATH trains running to Manhattan.

In all, Bayonne will see work start on around 1,000 residential units this year, says Joe DeMarco, the city’s business administrator. It expects to add another 2,000 to 3,000 apartments over the next five to six years.

“For a small little city, it’s humming,” DeMarco says.

To fill all those new pads, Bayonne is banking on the same factors that drew Tsay and Suchocki years before — proximity to New York City (about an hour on public transportation) and lower prices. Buyers can find single-family homes in Bayonne for around $400,000, significantly less than the $800,000 or more they’ll pay in Jersey City, according to Weichert Realtors agent Janice Hall. Bayonne rentals hover around $1,800 for a one-bedroom and between $2,200 and $3,000 for a two-bedroom. Similar units in Jersey City go for around $2,500 and $3,500, respectively.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Gold Coast, New Development | 124 Comments

When will the rest of Jersey follow?

From the Star Ledger:

The 19 hottest real estate markets in N.J. are surging

Time to separate the wheat from the chaff.

New Jersey’s real estate market has been fairly fractured since the Great Recession ended in 2009. A slow recovery has meant many are still waiting for their property values to recover, but that’s certainly not true across the board.

A handful of towns are seeing incredible demand and, combined with low inventories, prices have been skyrocketing in recent months.

The 19 towns below all, according to real estate tracking giant Zillow, have seen their median home values peak at the start of 2017. We used Zillow’s own Home Value Index for our analysis (methodology here) and excluded shore communities where there is a strong secondary home market.
Each of these towns stand a head and shoulders above New Jersey’s statewide price growth during the last year and some have seen home values soar to remarkable heights.

These towns are not only bucking the overall trend, but many have blown past the value they had prior to the recession.

A common thread? Trains

The most easily identifiable trend among NJ’s hottest towns is clear — access to transit. Each of the towns are within minutes of an NJ Transit station, which despite the transit service’s recent woes, remains a tremendous draw for prospective home buyers.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 108 Comments

National home prices hit 33 month high

From CNBC:

Growth in US home prices continues in March, reaching 33-month high

U.S. home prices rose slightly less than what was anticipated for the month of March, according to new data from the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index. But the gains were enough to reach a 33-month high, climbing at the strongest rate in nearly three years.

This, as inventory of homes for sale remains “unusually low,” the group said.

The national home price index increased 5.8 percent in March, while analysts were expecting home prices to rise by 5.9 percent for the month, according to Thomson Reuters consensus estimates.

Meanwhile, the widely tracked 20-city home price index rose 5.9 percent from a year ago in March, the most since July 2014.

The latest data released Tuesday shows that home prices continued their impressive rise, across the country, over the past 12 months.

Home prices had hit a record in September, and the pace of growth accelerated ever since then. Among the 20 cities surveyed for this report, Seattle, Portland and Dallas just reported their highest year-over-year gains.

The smallest gain of 4.1 percent was in New York.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, National Real Estate | 84 Comments

How your tax dollars are spent to protect the wealthy

From Climate Central:

How Rising Seas Drowned the Flood Insurance Program

Long Beach Island is the largest and richest barrier island in New Jersey, an oasis of sprawling oceanfront retreats and second homes located midway down the state’s heavily developed coast, a two-hour drive from the metropolitan centers of New York City and Philadelphia. On a clear day, visitors in the southern end can see the shiny facades of the Atlantic City casinos rising like obelisks across Great Bay. In the north, historic Barnegat Lighthouse towers over an unruly inlet steadied by boulders stretching into the Atlantic Ocean. In many places, the long, slender island is barely a few feet above sea level. And like most of New Jersey’s coast, it has been eroding for decades, leaving it vulnerable to flooding and rising seas.

Recently, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers pumped more than ten million cubic yards of sand from offshore dredges to widen Long Beach Island’s beaches and dunes – part of a Sisyphean-like effort to protect the island’s $15 billion of high-calorie real estate. But there is a problem. The sand keeps washing away. A series of storms over the last two years gouged the neatly groomed beaches, costing tens of millions in additional repairs. When all is said and done, the project will cost more than half a billion dollars, most of the money paid by U.S. taxpayers.

Like other barrier islands up and down the Atlantic and Gulf coasts, Long Beach Island is drowning in slow motion. Over the last century, researchers estimate that the ocean and bays that flank the island have risen by about a foot. That doesn’t sound like much, but the added water has made a huge difference in life on the island. Barnegat Bay now routinely washes over the bulkheads and floods the streets. Occasionally, school buses have to wait for the water to recede to pick up or drop off children. Even more worrisome, the rising water makes it easier for storm surge and waves to do more damage in violent storms such as Hurricane Sandy, which wrecked Long Beach Island and the back-bay communities in Ocean County in October of 2012.

Dave Rinear’s small bungalow on Cedar Bonnet Island – a smudge mark of sand and sedge located just behind Long Beach Island – had the misfortune of facing a vast, open fetch of Barnegat Bay. Surges from Sandy lifted a 24-foot speedboat named Plan B from its winter mooring and launched it into Rinear’s cedar shake cottage, blowing out a wall and washing away most of the contents, including 50 years worth of prized fishing journals. “Talk about laser-guided misfortune,” the 72-year-old retired professor moaned. “That thing came up the bay like a laser-guided missile with my name on it.”

Rinear’s bungalow was totaled. But he filed a claim with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and received enough to help him rebuild a larger new house on the same footprint. In all, the federal flood program paid out $8 billion in Sandy-related claims. More than $2 billion went to property owners in Ocean County, including $200 million on Long Beach Island. That was nearly twentyfold what island property owners had collected in the prior 35 years of the program.

Today, the NFIP is effectively bankrupt. It owes the U.S. Treasury nearly $25 billion – money it borrowed from federal taxpayers to cover its obligations in Sandy, Katrina (2005), and Hurricane Ike (2008). No one expects that money to be repaid. Some coastal state lawmakers are even calling for Congress to write off the massive debt, contending it is the only way the troubled insurance program, which is up for reauthorization this year, can regain its financial footing.

Wiping away the debt will help. But it is only a matter of time until the next big storm drains the coffers again. Even relatively weak hurricanes cause hundreds of millions in damage, while monster storms like Katrina and Sandy cause billions. Complicating matters, the NFIP has improbably subsidized thousands of risky properties along the coast – low-lying houses that flood over and over – by charging them below-market premiums to entice them to join the program.

It wasn’t supposed to be like this. The government got into the flood insurance business reluctantly, and only after private insurers fled the market because it was too risky and unpredictable. When Congress finally passed the NFIP in 1968, it was intended in part to steer development away from vulnerable floodplains. However, many coastal communities ignored the restrictions and filled the nation’s barrier islands and back bays with property. The value of land and property on the New Jersey coast soared from less than $1 billion in 1960 to over $170 billion today. Most of that property is located in what NFIP officials call Special Flood Hazard Areas, low-lying places likely to flood and suffer extreme damage in catastrophic storms.

Today, at least $3 trillion worth of property lines the Atlantic and Gulf coasts. Much of it is insured by the NFIP, including approximately one million second homes and investment properties. Rising sea levels will make it easier for future storms and waves to damage those houses by elevating the angle of attack. “Think of it this way,” says Kopp, “if the flood level is five feet and you add a foot of sea level, then the new flood level is six feet. That elevates the platform (for surge and waves). It’s that simple.”

A 2016 Rutgers study found that seas near New Jersey could rise between 1 and 1.8 feet by the middle of this century under a scenario of low carbon emissions. But under a high emissions scenario, seas could swell as high as 4.5 feet by 2100. Recently, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration study estimated mean global sea levels could rise as high as 8 feet by the end of the century.

Several more feet of water would be devastating, swallowing vast swaths of real estate, according to several studies. A June 2014 report called Risky Business, prepared by a group co-chaired by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, estimated that between $66 billion and $160 billion worth of U.S. real estate could be below sea level by 2050 – and up to half-a-trillion by the end of this century.

Posted in Politics, Risky Lending, Shore Real Estate | 22 Comments

Philly the reason for South Jersey’s slump?

From Philly.com:

Despite vibrancy in Philly’s suburbs, home values still struggle

If the massive cluster of new housing, shops, and restaurants rising in King of Prussia is any indication, the suburbs are as prosperous as ever. There, as elsewhere across the Philadelphia region, developers have poured millions into new developments and town squares, betting on the prospect that Philadelphia itself can’t stay attractive — or affordable — forever.

It makes sense: Since 2010, every suburban county in the region except for Camden County has seen its population grow. Communities such as Ardmore and Media have enjoyed new success after rethinking their downtowns. And corporations have been ditching the city for the suburbs, heading to municipalities they say can offer lower taxes.

There’s just one flaw in this picture: Nearly 10 years after the housing bubble burst, the median home-sale price in the Philadelphia suburbs is down 11 percent, having dropped $27,000, from $242,950 in the first quarter of 2007 to $216,000 in 2017. And few signs exist that the suburbs will regain their pre-housing-bust vigor quickly.

It’s posing a problem for some suburban homeowners — many of whom are holding on to their homes longer, for fear they may not be able to sell for a high enough price. And it’s causing ripple effects across the market, resulting in fewer properties for sale and bidding wars for those that are, and a growing challenge for first-time buyers and the middle class to find houses they can afford.

“Suburban homeowners … cannot obtain a sufficiently high price that allows them to also pay off their remaining mortgage balance,” said economist Kevin Gillen of Drexel University’s Lindy Institute for Urban Innovation, who releases a quarterly analysis of regional home values based on sale-price data for single-family homes from the city’s Recorder of Deeds Office and Trend Multiple Listing Service. (The analysis does not include condo sales.)

The slump also presents a sharp contrast to Philadelphia, which in first-quarter 2017 saw home values surge 11.8 percent compared with a year ago, according to Gillen’s analysis for his Home Price Index, which evaluates the region’s entire housing stock, regardless of whether homes were purchased during a particular period.

By contrast, suburban values dropped 0.5 percent as a whole in first-quarter 2017, according to Gillen’s analysis of homes in Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery Counties in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, and Gloucester Counties in New Jersey.

Yet the losses in the suburbs have been exacerbated over time, Gillen found: Since the first quarter of 2007, when the housing boom peaked in the suburbs, every county in the region has seen its overall home values fall — some of them drastically. And even with property values appreciating at a rate of 2.4 percent a year, a typical suburban home is still valued 19.1 percent lower than it was at peak of the housing boom in 2007.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, South Jersey Real Estate | 9 Comments

Access = Prosperity

From the Star Ledger:

What causes income inequality among similar N.J. towns?

Railroads have historically been instrumental to human development by connecting economic centers and providing people with enhanced access to opportunities. New Jersey is no exception. In the 1830s, numerous railroad companies jockeyed for access to Jersey City in order to capitalize on Manhattan’s economic boom.

Shortly thereafter, new train lines were built, and certain towns in the state gained access to Jersey City and Manhattan (see Benjamin Bernhart’s “Historic Journeys by Rail: Central Railroad of New Jersey Stations, Structures & Marine Equipment” for more information).

These towns, in turn, would explosively transition from agriculturally-based economies to diverse and white-collar hubs.

Unfortunately, railroad access to Manhattan was not granted equitably, and economic inequality between towns and counties expanded as time wore on. We see this inequality most clearly when comparing the success of towns with early, direct access to train lines to towns without such access.

Consider the towns of Plainfield and Westfield in Union County, where income inequality is abundantly clear. Westfield households earn 2.69 times more and the average property is worth $429,100 more than their neighbors in Plainfield. Until the Central Railroad of New Jersey built a direct line between Westfield and Jersey City in 1901, Westfield and Plainfield shared a similar history.

Both towns were largely dependent on agriculture for growth and sustenance. But once the connection from Jersey City to Manhattan was established, Westfield transitioned from a blue-collar to white-collar town and naturally experienced economic prosperity. On the other hand, Plainfield did not gain access to the Jersey City line until 1910 – for reasons which are still unclear.

Today, Westfield has an express line to/from Newark Penn station during rush hour that skips the seven other towns between Westfield and Manhattan. This has attracted more wealthy families to the area, led to a better school system and public services, and, overall, perpetuated the vast inequality between the neighboring towns.

We see a similar trend when comparing the fortunes of Garfield with that of Ridgewood over in Bergen County. The town’s Chamber of Commerce acknowledges that failed attempts to build a rail line in the 1870s – and a lack of early train access – were inhibitors to the town’s development.

Meanwhile, Ridgewood, which according to the 2010 U.S. Census Bureau today has a median household income of $147,823 compared to Garfield’s $45,469, got rail access to NYC as early as 1848. Ridgewood and similarly wealthy Bergen County towns point to the railroad as a critical turning point in the town’s success, as it attracted wealthy businessmen to a countryside lifestyle with work access.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 48 Comments

The New Newark

From the NYT:

Work for Audible, Live Rent-Free?

Would you live in Newark if your boss paid your rent for a year?

That was the question that Audible.com, the audiobook company, posed to its workers when it announced a housing lottery in January. The 20 winning employees would get $2,000 a month in free rent for a year if they signed a two-year lease at the newly restored Hahne & Company building in downtown Newark, a 10-minute walk from Audible’s headquarters.

Of about 1,000 employees in the company’s Newark and Jersey City offices, 64 applied. In March, the company, which has 16 global locations, expanded the offer, pledging a $250 monthly rent stipend for a year to any employee who lives in, or moves to, Newark. More than two dozen employees have taken advantage of that offer.

Audible is among a handful of companies around the country to offer housing assistance to its workers, although such benefits tend to happen in areas where the cost of living is extraordinarily high, which is not the case for Newark.

Only about 70 Audible employees working in the headquarters live in Newark, and that number includes those who took the company up on its housing offer. About a quarter of the company’s New Jersey-based employees live in New York City and Jersey City and the rest commute from elsewhere in the tristate area, coming from as far away as Connecticut.

Many Audible workers suffer through long commutes not because they can’t afford to live near where they work, but because they don’t want to. So for Audible, the incentive isn’t really about money; it’s about Newark. “Clearly what they’re trying to do is to get people to give Newark a try,” Mr. Lubell said.

Audible’s founder and chief executive, Donald R. Katz, has been something of a cheerleader for the struggling city, ever since he moved the headquarters to Newark from Wayne, N.J., a decade ago.

Conference rooms are named after notable natives like Aaron Burr, Gloria Gaynor and Shaquille O’Neal. Two years ago, the company helped start an incubator, Newark Venture Partners, to lure fledgling technology companies to the city. And next year, Audible will expand into three buildings on nearby James Street, including the Second Presbyterian Church from 1811, which Mr. Katz calls a “tech cathedral.”

For Mr. Katz, persuading workers to live in the city is a logical next step now that developers are pouring money into housing downtown. The first project to catch his eye was the Hahne department store at 50 Halsley Street, which underwent a $174 million renovation to build 160 apartments, a Whole Foods Market and a Rutgers University cultural center. “Young people want to be pioneers,” he said. But Mr. Katz, who is 65 and lives in Montclair, a wealthy suburb about 10 miles away, has no plans to move to Newark anytime soon.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, New Development, New Jersey Real Estate | 28 Comments

If not for immigrants, NJ would be sunk

From the Star Ledger:

Immigration is the only thing keeping N.J.’s population afloat, data shows

New Jersey came closer to reaching nine million residents last year, but the state’s meager growth slowed its pace toward that milestone, according to new Census data.

The state was home to 8,944,469 people in July 2016, an increase of 9,000 over the same time in 2015. If that population growth continues, New Jersey will not hit that nine million market until roughly 2022.

New Jersey was 39th in the nation in population growth over the past year, increasing by just 0.1 percent, compared to the national average of 0.7 percent. It ranked roughly the same in growth since 2010, the year the Census uses as a comparison point in its data.

The state’s population growth comes from births and inward migration, while it shrinks due to the deaths and outward migration. While it had some of the highest international migration in the nation — nearly 300,000 since 2010 — it has lost even more people from outward migration.

This difference could have long-term impact on New Jersey’s demographics and economy. The state relies on population growth to drive economic growth and productivity.

Previous data has shown Asian immigrants account for 45 percent of net international immigration to the state, followed by Latin American immigrants. Meanwhile, Jersey-born residents are leaving the state to retire or look for other jobs.

Posted in Demographics, New Jersey Real Estate | 15 Comments

Does this explain the construction gap?

From Bloomberg:

Foreclosures Dry Up and a Hot Wall Street Trade Gets New Look

It was a rare lucrative business for Wall Street in the aftermath of the financial crisis: snapping up properties in foreclosure and renting them out. So good, in fact, that now, as the distressed pool dries up, some investors are refusing to let the rental-model fizzle. They’re building more and more of the houses themselves.

American Homes 4 Rent, a five-year-old real estate investment trust and the biggest of the publicly traded landlords by number of homes, is buying lots and houses around the U.S. Colony Starwood Homes plans to purchase at least 600 just-erected properties over the next year from more than a dozen builders. Privately held AHV Communities LLC is plotting whole neighborhoods for those who want — without the bother of ownership — single-family residences with some apartment-complex bells and whistles, such as fitness centers and bocce-ball courts. Residents don’t even have to mow their lawns.

The bet behind the build-to-rent boom is that there are enough people who dream of the detached-house life but can’t afford to buy into it. With tight mortgage standards and rising prices, and millennials putting off marriage and loaded up with student debt, that might not be a long shot.

As it is, the homeownership rate in the U.S. has been hovering for a while near a 51-year low, according to U.S. Census data, though that could be changing: The number of owner-occupied homes rose faster than the number of renting households for the first time since 2006 in the first three months of the year.

For the landlord companies, it typically costs more, of course, to purchase a freshly constructed property than it does to acquire and refurbish an already lived-in model. But they’re getting discounts from builders. They also have to put less into maintenance and repairs, especially early on.

And a new single-family rental can command higher rent, 5 percent to 8 percent more than an older, renovated one, according to Alex Sifakis, president of based JWB Real Estate Capital, which has built about 450 rental homes in Jacksonville, Florida, since 2011.

American Homes 4 Rent, started by Public Storage founder B. Wayne Hughes, expects the new homes it’s having constructed will bring higher yields than the existing properties it buys, executives said on a call with analysts.

What the other REITs are doing is not only generating business for the building industry but getting them out of jams. “Some builders get a little bit of fatigue at the end of trying to close out an existing community, and they have maybe 10, 15, 20 remaining homes,” Colony Starwood Chief Financial Officer Arik Prawer said on a February conference call. By the same token, “some builders love to just get some momentum going in a new community, and like for us to buy a strip of homes upfront just to get it going.”

Colony executives said this month that they have three communities in the works, where every home is a newly built rental, and eight more planned. The company is No. 2 in total returns among the largest single-family landlords this year through Friday.

Even Lennar Corp., the second-largest U.S. homebuilder, is in on the game. It created its own rental-only community in Sparks, Nevada, a Reno suburb, starting with about 80 homes in 2015. Now there are 225, with all but two occupied as of last month, according to the local leasing office.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, National Real Estate, New Development | 145 Comments