Rising incomes will have an “outsized” impact on NJ

From the Record:

Some optimism about the state economy, for a change

New Jersey’s economy has rarely failed to disappoint in recent years, but economist Joel Naroff thinks that may change in 2016.

He foresees a solid national performance, with economic growth of around 3 percent. And while New Jersey won’t match the nation, the state will enjoy a similar performance – unlike past years, when the state has clearly lagged, Naroff said.

“We are beginning to follow national trends again,” said Naroff, who is economic adviser to the Trenton-based New Jersey Business and Industry Association, adding that his comments reflect only his own views. “That’s good news.”

“I am positive about the direction the state’s economy is going in,” he said. “I am not saying it’s going to be strong. We are not going to have a great economy. But we had improvement in the second half of 2015, and that will carry through to 2016.”

The upbeat forecast from the economist, who heads his own consulting company, contrasts with his past laments about the state’s lackluster economic recovery.

He has worried that no industry appears to be strong enough, or with enough potential, to lift the state out of the doldrums created by the decline of such past powerhouse sectors as manufacturing and telecommunications, the downsized casino industry, the weakened financial sector and the diminished pharmaceutical industry.

Yet the state is coming into its own as a distribution, logistics and warehouse hub, and that will help, Naroff said. The rise of online shopping requires logistical excellence to get goods purchased online quickly to consumers, and the state’s ports, infrastructure and proximity to the vast metropolitan market make it well placed to benefit from the shift, he said.

Outside of that, Naroff said the economy will be helped by a rise in incomes, which will have an “outsized” impact on New Jersey, because of its dense population.

“I think the state economy accelerates in 2016, in no small part because we will finally start seeing better income gains,” he said. “And that feeds back. Income gains means greater demand. Greater demand means more hiring. More hiring means more income. And you set off this positive impact.”

Posted in Economics, Employment, Housing Recovery, New Jersey Real Estate | 51 Comments

Predictions 2016!

This is becoming a tradition around here, so here we go again! You know how this works, break out the crystal balls and prognosticate.

Ground Rules

Predictions provided should either be for June 30th, 2016 or December 31st, 2016, please specify.

Provide justification for your forecast, where applicable (unless you are just making it up, if so, state that).

You may provide any caveats and/or assumptions that your forecast is based on.

You need not provide a forecast for all categories below.

Where applicable, forecasts are judged against the surveys/reports listed.

Real Estate
National
Existing Home Sales – NAR
Existing Home Price – S&P Case Shiller HPI
Existing Home Price – Other
National New Home Sales – NAHB
Median New Home Price – NAHB

New Jersey
Existing Home Sales – NAR/NJAR
Existing Home Price – S&P Case Shiller HPI
Existing Home Price – Other

Commodities
Energy (Oil, NatGas)
Metals (Gold, Silver, Copper)

Equities
United States
International Developed Markets
Emerging Markets

Mortgage Financing
30-Year Fixed – Freddie Mac PMMS
15-Year Fixed – Freddie Mac PMMS

Foreclosures
Delinquency Rate
Foreclosure Rate

Macroeconomic
10y Treasury
Fed Funds Rate
National Unemployment Rate
New Jersey Unemployment Rate

Oddball
Anything else you’d like to make a prediction about.

Posted in General | 57 Comments

Millennials can barely afford their own bedroom

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, National Real Estate | 46 Comments

Despite our arrogance, we’re not in the top 20.

From HousingWire:

Here are the 20 hottest housing markets to close out the year

Discuss:

Here are the 20 hottest housing markets in December

20. Midland, Texas

19. Fort Wayne, Indiana

18. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Florida

17. Boulder, Colorado

16. Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Michigan

15. Modesto, California

14. Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, Florida

13. Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, Tennessee

12. Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, California

11. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, California

10. Stockton-Lodi, California

9. Yuba City, California

8. Santa Rosa, California

7. Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colorado

6. San Diego-Carlsbad, California

5. Sacramento-Roseville-Arden-Arcade, California

4. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas

3. Vallejo-Fairfield, California

2. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, California

1. San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, California

Posted in Housing Recovery, National Real Estate, New Jersey Real Estate | 46 Comments

#FOMO

From the WSJ:

Housing Rebound: Time for Millennials to Leave the Nest

Millennials appear to be in no rush to ditch their parents’ homes. Perhaps they should be.

More adults between ages 18 and 34 are now living with mommy and daddy than ever before, according to the Pew Research Center. And the millennials who have fled the nest have increasingly become renters rather than buyers, a major reason the U.S. homeownership rate hit a 48-year low earlier this year.

But times are changing. Job prospects are improving and wages are showing signs of breaking out. Those factors alone suggest conditions are favorable for home buyers. Yet record levels of student debt are weighing on millennials and that could prompt them to miss out on a ripe opportunity to buy.

Consider the coming S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, due Tuesday. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal estimate home prices across the nation rose 5.2% in the 12 months ended in October, up from a 4.9% increase in the comparable period a month earlier.

Of course, that is good news for current homeowners. They reap the benefits of seeing home values appreciate by more than twice the rate of inflation. But that doesn’t help a millennial skittish about becoming a first-time home buyer. Rising home values make it even more difficult to muster 20% for a down payment.

Furthermore, the benefit of ultralow mortgage rates won’t last forever. The average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was still under 4% in December, according to Freddie Mac. With the Federal Reserve expected to keep raising interest rates at a measured pace in 2016, they should move higher as well.

Rising prices and interest rates may please the older generation, but not the one that hasn’t yet begun climbing the property ladder.

The fear of missing out—or FOMO, as the kids say these days—should prompt millennials to act now.

Posted in Demographics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 87 Comments

$1m to buy the average condo/coop in NYC

From the WSJ:

New York City Housing Prices Set Record

Manhattan apartment prices reached new highs in 2015, with the typical price of a co-op or condominium topping $1 million for the first time as the year drew to a close.

The new benchmark, in the fourth quarter, was a milestone in the rising cost, and for many the unaffordability, of homeownership in New York City.

Many brokers and analysts attributed the marker to a surge in closings at expensive new buildings that have been under construction for years, including many deals signed months or even years ago. The rest of the market showed more modest prices gains and slower sales growth.

Instead of celebrating the new benchmark, brokers described an alternative real estate universe in the second half of 2015: There were signs of a slowdown beginning in the summer, with a modest uptick late in the year.

The number of foreign buyers dropped, they said, while New York buyers became extremely price sensitive.

“There is more supply and more headwinds in the market,” with supply pressures varying from neighborhood to neighborhood, said Dolly Lenz, a broker in the luxury market. “Buyers have a whole lot of choices and they are voting with their dollars.”

The median price of a Manhattan apartment rose to nearly $1.1 million, an increase of 13.5% from $965,000 from both the previous quarter and the fourth quarter of 2014, according to an analysis of city Department of Finance data by The Wall Street Journal. The average price also increased to a record of $1.9 million in the fourth quarter from $1.67 million in the third quarter.

For all of 2015, the median price also set a record: $980,000, up 6.5% from $920,000 in 2014. Sales were up slightly too, by 2.1%, but below the sales pace in 2013. There were 12,872 sales in 2015, compared with 12,608 in 2014, based on sales filed with the city through Dec. 21 of each year.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, NYC | 97 Comments

2015 Economic Snapshot

From the Record:

2015 was the year of the long good-bye, but jobs rebounded

New Jersey’s job market swung from optimism to despair and back in 2015, ending the year on a high note, with the largest annual employment increase in 15 years.

Yet the encouraging performance will have to show continued strength if it is going to dispel the notion that the state’s economy lags the national expansion.

New Jersey added 37,800 jobs in the first five months of the year, only to lose 60 percent of them in June and July. Since then, state employment has grown by about 12,000 jobs a month, bringing the figure to 55,000 through November, the most since the 78,400 jobs created in 2000.

The state’s employment increase, by 1.38 percent, is smaller than the national employment increase of 1.64 percent so far this year. New Jersey’s jobless rate of 5.3 percent remains above the national level of 5 percent. And the state has recovered only about 78 percent of the jobs lost in the recession; the U.S. regained them more than a year ago.

Construction provided the state’s largest proportional employment increase, adding 9,800 jobs for a 7 percent increase in 2015 that reflected the strength in the housing market. The next biggest gains were in education and health services — a reliable growth sector that saw employment rise 2.4 percent — and leisure and hospitality, which expanded by 2.2 percent, shrugging off the weakness of 2014 from the casino meltdown in Atlantic City.

The most striking improvement was in the manufacturing sector, long a declining area, which increased by 1.57 percent, or 3,800 jobs, this year, prompting economists to wonder whether the drop had bottomed out.

That did little to diminish concern at the weakness in the professional and business services group, home to many of the state’s high-paying occupations. The sector shed 900 jobs in 2015.

North Jersey’s housing market continued to recover in 2015 from a deep downturn, with multifamily construction and the number of home sales up significantly.

But the pain is not over. Price increases were muted, and the state led the nation in foreclosures.

Home construction in the state has rebounded strongly from the depths of the housing crash, when only about 13,000 housing units were started each year from 2009 to 2011 — the lowest numbers since World War II. In 2015, the state’s builders are on track to start more than 30,000 units — the highest number since 2006, and close to the longtime averages in the 37,000 range.

The growth this year was entirely in multifamily construction, especially along the Hudson River waterfront in Hudson and Bergen counties. Single-family building permits were actually down by 8.2 percent through November, reflecting the high price of land and the fact many households are renting, either by choice or because they can’t qualify for a mortgage.

Still, the number of single-family home sales through November was up 11 percent in Bergen and 14 percent in Passaic County over the same period last year, according to the New Jersey Realtors. Despite the increased demand for homes, prices didn’t budge much, up 2.2 percent in Bergen and 3.5 percent in Passaic.

During the year, New Jersey led the nation in foreclosure activity. Lenders continued to clear up a backlog of distressed properties that built up after the mortgage industry was forced to slow down foreclosures after being accused of abusing the rights of homeowners in trouble.

Posted in Economics, Employment, Housing Recovery, New Jersey Real Estate | 20 Comments

Something’s fishy about the New Home Sales numbers

Housingwire cites Zerohedge? I like it.

Is there more trouble hidden in November’s new home sales data?

But a deeper dive into the new home sales data shows that November’s increase over October isn’t quite as promising as it appears.

The folks over at Zero Hedge spotted a potentially troubling trend of the new home sales data being continually revised down, making each month’s figures look not nearly as positive as first reported.

For example, the initial estimate for October’s new home sales data was a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 495,000, so the revised data released Wednesday showed a downward revision of 25,000.

With November’s new home sales data printing at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 490,000, November’s new home sales are actually lower than October’s initial total.

But comparing the November’s initial estimate to October’s revised total is not an apples-to-apples comparison, but a further look at the year’s data shows why November’s data could look a whole lot different in about a month when December’s data is released.

As Zero Hedge noted, the last five months have each been revised downward from the initial projections.

September’s initial report showed a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 468,000, but the current data from the Census and HUD shows that the revised total for September is actually 442,000, a decrease of 26,000 over the initial total.

The difference between August’s initially reported totals and the revised figures are even more significant.

When September’s initial report came out, the initial estimates had new home sales collapsing 11.5% from what was then August’s revised total of 529,000. But since then, August’s total has been revised even further.

August’s initial report showed at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 552,000, but the current revised total is 507,000, a decrease of 45,000 from the initial report and a decrease of 22,000 from what was reported in October.

So the actual decrease from August to September was 84,000, not 65,000 as it was initially thought to be.

October, September and August were not the only months where the new home sale data has been revised down.

July’s initial report showed at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 507,000, but the current revised total is 500,000, a decrease of 7,000.

June’s total was revised down from 482,000 to 469,000, a decrease of 13,000.

May’s total was revised down from 546,000 to 513,000, a decrease of 33,000.

And April’s total was revised down from 517,000 to 508,000, a decrease of 9,000.

So, for the last seven months, the average reduction from the initially reported new home sales data is approximately 22,570.

Subtract that average reduction of 22,570 from November’s total of 490,000 and November’s new home sales print at an estimated 467,430, which would represent a decrease of approximately 3,000 from October’s revised total, not an increase as was initially reported.

So, will next month’s report showed that new home sales actually fell in November?

The math certainly seems to show that that is exactly what happened.

Posted in Economics, National Real Estate, Politics | 38 Comments

Did TRID cause the November dip?

From HousingWire:

The TRID effect is real: Existing-home sales fall sharply in November

First there was anecdotal evidence that the implementation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures rule in October had caused issues with the housing industry, but now, concrete data is beginning to show just how much the impact of TRID is being felt – and the news isn’t great.

Last week, the latest Origination Insight Report by Ellie Mae showed the average time to close a loan increased by 3 days during the month of November to 49 total days, making it the longest time needed to close a loan since Feb. 2013.

And according to the latest report from the National Association of Realtors, those closing delays helped considerably slow down existing-home sales in the month of November.

According to NAR’s latest report, the total existing-home sales, which are completed transactions that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, fell 10.5% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.76 million in November.

Existing-home sales cooled to the slowest pace in 19 months during November, NAR’s report showed, to the lowest seasonally adjusted annual rate since April 2014 when it was 4.75 million.

This it the second month in a row that existing-home sales have fallen. In October, total existing-home sales decreased 3.4% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.36 million.

After last month’s decline, which NAR said was the largest since July 2010 at 22.5%, existing-home sales are now 3.8% below a year ago, which is the first year-over-year decrease since Sept. 2014.

According to NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun, the decline is not entirely due to TRID, but TRID certainly isn’t helping.

NAR’s report also showed extended closing times, which Yun said may be pushing sales out into December, with the hope being that closings are just being delayed, not disappearing entirely.

Posted in Housing Recovery, Mortgages, National Real Estate | 121 Comments

November Existing Home Sales

From the WSJ:

U.S. Existing Home Sales Plunge in November

Sales of previously owned homes plummeted in November as delays caused by new mortgage red-tape and a dwindling supply of residences on the market pushed down sales to a level not seen since April 2014.

Existing-home sales fell 10.5% last month to a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 4.76 million, the National Association of Realtors said Tuesday, well below the 5.32 million economists expected. The double-digit decline was the sharpest since July 2010, when sales took a hit from the expiration of a home-buyer tax credit.

The NAR blamed the lion’s share of the November decline on closing delays caused by new federal rules implemented by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in October, although it said rising home prices and tight inventory continued to challenge potential buyers.

Several realtors said pressure on housing inventories is also driving the sales slump. The number of existing homes for sale fell more than 3% on the month in November and was down nearly 2% on the year.

“I think we’re still seeing a fair amount of tightness in active selling markets,” said Zillow Chief Economist Svenja Gudell, adding first-time buyers trying to enter the market at a lower price point are facing particular scarcity. Housing prices have also climbed faster than wages in many markets, making it more difficult for first-time buyers to save for a down payment.

In November, the national median home price rose to $220,300, the 45th consecutive month of gains year over year, and 6.3% higher than the same month last year.

Despite November’s decline, NAR said home sales are on track for their best year since the current economic expansion began. Economists said the underlying sales rate appears steady, despite the rule changes causing turbulence last month.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 44 Comments

Just let Atlantic City fall into the sea

From the Record:

Legislators advance competing measures to put approval of North Jersey casinos on ballot

State Senate and Assembly committees each passed resolutions on Thursday designed to have voters statewide determine next fall whether to amend the state constitution to allow two casinos to operate in North Jersey.

But the two measures differ on how much tax revenue from the North Jersey casinos should go to support Atlantic City — a discrepancy that could jeopardize efforts to pass the resolution before the end of the lame-duck session next month in Trenton.

The version that the Assembly Judiciary Committee approved Thursday would send 35 percent of tax revenues from the North Jersey casinos to a new state entity that would use those resources to bring more diverse entertainment and leisure options to the struggling, casino-dependent city. The revised measure that emerged from the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee would send 49 percent of the first $150 million in North Jersey casino tax revenues to Atlantic City, then 40 percent, 30 percent, and 20 percent of each subsequent $150 million that the casinos generate.

Additionally, the Assembly resolution would allow for one of the two winning casino bids to have no affiliation with a company that operates an Atlantic City casino. But Stephen Sweeney, the state Senate president who represents a South Jersey district, said it was critical that any North Jersey casino operator have an Atlantic City-based partner — a provision of the Senate measure.

“I want the industry in the north part of the state to be tied to Atlantic City,” Sweeney said Thursday, adding that a patron at a casino in the Meadowlands or in Jersey City should be able, for example, to earn a free room or meal at an Atlantic City counterpart.

Sweeney also said of the higher subsidy for Atlantic City in the Senate measure: “I’m not just going to let Atlantic City fall into the sea after it has provided billions and billions of dollars to the state. It would be easy for me to curry favor with my friends in other parts of the state and say, ‘The hell with them.’ But we are not going to let that happen.”

The referendum would ask voters whether to amend the state constitution, which currently restricts casino gambling to Atlantic City, allowing two casinos to be established in separate counties at least 75 miles from the struggling seaside resort city. Neither version of the resolution spells out where the casinos would be built, but all locations would have to be north of Monmouth and Mercer counties. The most likely locations appear to be the Meadowlands and Jersey City.

Assemblyman Ralph Caputo, D-Essex, who sponsored the Assembly resolution, has said that the Senate version, with its more generous Atlantic City subsidy, is more likely to be rejected by taxpayers who are aware of the city’s longstanding budget woes and recurring corruption scandals there over the years.

Posted in New Development, North Jersey Real Estate, Politics | 78 Comments

Atlantic City in the Top 10 … worst performing markets

From HousingWire:

These are the top and bottom 10 housing markets right now

As the year comes to a close, Pro Teck Valuation Services’ latest home value forecast of the top 10 best and 10 worst performing metros ended the year on the same note, fluctuating little over the year.

The rankings are based on a number of leading real estate market indicators, including: Sales/listing activity and prices, months of remaining inventory, days on market, sold-to-list price ratio and foreclosure and REO activity.

Pro Teck measures Core Based Statistical Areas which consist of the county or counties with a substantial population, along with adjacent commuter communities. It refers collectively to metropolitan statistical areas and micropolitan statistical areas.

This month’s Bottom 10 CBSAs include:

Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, Florida
Huntington-Ashland, West Virginia-Kentucky-Ohio
Joplin, Missouri
Lake County-Kenosha County, Illinois-Wisconsin
Lake Havasu City-Kingman, Arizona
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Texas
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, Wisconsin
Midland, Texas
Atlantic City-Hammonton, New Jersey
Jacksonville, North Carolina.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Housing Recovery, Shore Real Estate | 39 Comments

Not the lenders responsibility, except in NJ…

Again, NJ legislators lack awareness of their own unintended consequences. From the Star Ledger:

3-year foreclosure ban for Sandy victims headed to Christie’s desk

A bill aimed at keeping thousands of Hurricane Sandy victims from entering into foreclosure for three years passed both houses of the state Legislature on Thursday.

The bill (S2577) would prevent lenders from foreclosing on homeowners waiting for funds through rebuilding grant programs run by the state.

It would also allow homeowners waiting for grant money to qualify for a three-year forbearance period, during which time they would not have to make mortgage payments.

State Assemblyman Gary Schaer (D-Passaic), one of the bill’s sponsors, said state “has not adequately or appropriately addressed the needs” of Sandy victims.

But a representative from the New Jersey Bankers Association told lawmakers at a hearing on the bill earlier this year that lenders “are getting forced to carry the burden the government has failed to do themselves.”

Posted in Foreclosures, Mortgages, Politics, Shore Real Estate | 81 Comments

Fannie: 3 more rate hikes next year, little impact to mortgage rates

From HousingWire:

Fannie Mae: Expect 3 more Fed rate hikes in 2016

December 16, 2015, will forever be known as the day that the Federal Open Market Committee increased the federal funds rate for the first time since June 2006, but one housing industry insider expects that this rate hike won’t be the last one — far from it, in fact.

In a note published shortly after the Federal Reserve’s announcement, Doug Duncan, Fannie Mae’s chief economist, said that Wednesday’s announcement is just the first step in a longer journey for the Fed and that he expects to see several more rate hikes in 2016.

“This is one small step on an overdue journey for the Fed,” Duncan said.

Duncan said that Fannie Mae now expects three more hikes in the federal funds target in the next year.

Duncan also said that Fannie Mae expects the 30-year fixed mortgage rate to rise from 3.9% in the fourth quarter of this year to 4.1% by this time next year.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, Mortgages | 82 Comments

Fewer underwater borrowers, NY Metro among the highest positive equity

From CoreLogic:

CoreLogic Reports 256,000 US Properties Regained Equity in the Third Quarter of 2015

CoreLogic … today released a new analysis showing 256,000 properties regained equity in the third quarter of 2015, bringing the total number of mortgaged residential properties with equity at the end of Q3 2015 to approximately 46.3 million, or 92.0 percent of all homes with an outstanding mortgage. Nationwide, borrower equity increased year over year by $741 billion in Q3 2015.

The total number of mortgaged residential properties with negative equity stood at 4.1 million, or 8.1 percent, in Q3 2015. That was down 4.7 percent quarter over quarter from 4.3 million homes, or 8.7 percent, compared with Q2 2015* and down 20.7 percent year over year from 5.2 million homes, or 10.4 percent, compared with Q3 2014.

For the homes in negative equity status, the national aggregate value of negative equity was $301 billion at the end of Q3 2015, declining approximately $8.1 billion from $309.1 billion in Q2 2015, a decrease of 2.6 percent. On a year-over-year basis, the value of negative equity declined overall from $341 billion in Q3 2014, representing a decrease of 11.8 percent in 12 months.

“Home price growth continued to lift borrower equity positions and increase the number of borrowers with sufficient equity to participate in the mortgage market,” said Frank Nothaft, chief economist for CoreLogic. “In Q3 2015 there were 37.5 million borrowers with at least 20 percent equity, up 7 percent from 35 million in Q3 2014. In the last three years, borrowers with at least 20 percent equity have increased by 11 million, a substantial uptick that is driving rapid growth in home equity originations.”

Highlights

Of the 10 largest metropolitan areas based on mortgage count, Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz. had the highest percentage of mortgaged residential properties in negative equity at 14.2 percent, followed by Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, Ill. (13.8 percent), Riverside- San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. (11.4 percent), Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-Va.- Md.-W.Va. (10.8 percent) and Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Ga. (9.7 percent).

Of the same 10 metropolitan areas, Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas had the highest percentage of mortgaged residential properties with positive equity at 98.2 percent, followed by Dallas-Plano-Irving, Texas (97.9 percent), Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, Calif. (95.4 percent), Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis. (94.4 percent) and New York-Jersey City-White Plains, N.Y.-N.J. (94.3 percent).

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate, New Jersey Real Estate | 134 Comments