Going Global

From the Wall Street Journal:

Crisis Hits Europe’s Banks As U.S. Seals Bailout Deal

The White House and congressional leaders agreed on a deal to authorize the biggest banking rescue in U.S. history.

The $700 billion program would effectively nationalize an array of mortgages and securities backed by them — instruments whose deteriorating value has clogged the nation’s financial system.

Lawmakers finished writing the bill late Sunday, after which Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi declared it “frozen,” meaning no changes would be made. The bill leaves many mechanics of the operation up to the Treasury. Among these are the crucial issues of how the U.S. government would decide which assets it will buy and how it would decide what to pay for them. The legislation leaves the Treasury 45 days to issue guidelines on those procedures. The bill awaits votes in Congress starting on Monday.

From big Wall Street houses to small community banks, executives have expressed an interest in signing up for the bailout. But some have said the extent of their involvement will depend on critical details.

The political fallout from the bailout could be substantial, given the enormous expenditure of taxpayer money. Some polls show wide opposition. But the legislation includes provisions designed to guard against ultimate losses for the government. And it calls on the Treasury, as an owner of mortgage securities, to “encourage the servicers of the underlying mortgages” to minimize foreclosures.

The deal came after tension-filled weekend negotiations, where the specter of a faltering economy collided with the politics of a presidential election to create one of the biggest congressional dramas of recent years. Saturday included a high-decibel exchange between Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and congressional Democrats, a ban on handheld email devices to forestall news leaks, and a battery of lobbying calls from the president and the presidential candidates.

From Bloomberg:

European Lenders Rescued by Authorities as U.S. Crisis Spreads

European governments stepped in to rescue Bradford & Bingley Plc, Fortis, and Hypo Real Estate Holding AG as tremors from the U.S. credit crisis reverberated around the world.

The U.K. Treasury seized Bradford & Bingley, Britain’s biggest lender to landlords, while governments in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg threw an 11.2 billion-euro ($16.3 billion) lifeline to Fortis. Germany guaranteed a loan to Hypo.

The interventions exposed how fallout from the crisis that drove Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. into bankruptcy and prompted a $700 billion U.S. bank-rescue package has gone global. It also added urgency to negotiations among European policy makers as to how they deal with banking collapses.

“The precarious global environment means the weakest links in Europe are now falling,” said Mamoun Tazi, an analyst at MF Global Securities Ltd. in London. “If banks continue not to lend to each other we’ll see more failures.”

Tightening credit is casting a pall over the European economy with U.K. growth the weakest since the early 1990s and the 15-nation euro-area on the edge of its first recession. The risk is of a spiral in which the credit crisis and the economy begin to feed off each other, resulting in costlier borrowing and even weaker expansion.

“The extreme dislocations in European money markets are both a symptom and a source of serious stress in the financial sector, exacerbated by the rapidly deteriorating growth environment,” said Marco Annunziata, chief economist at Unicredit MIB in London.

To head off the collapse of its biggest bank, Belgium agreed to buy 49 percent of Fortis’s Belgian banking unit for 4.7 billion euros, while the Netherlands will pay 4 billion euros for a similar stake in the Dutch business, the governments said in a statement late yesterday. Luxembourg will provide a 2.5 billion-euro loan convertible into 49 percent of Fortis’s banking division in that country.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 806 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion

This is the time and place to post observations about your local areas, comments on news stories or the New Jersey housing market, open house reports, etc. If you have any questions you wanted to ask earlier in the week but never posted them up, let’s have them. Also a good place to post suggestions, requests for information, criticism, and praise.

For readers that have never commented, there is a link at the top of each message that is typically labelled “[#] Comments“. Go ahead and give that a click, you might be missing out on a world of information you didn’t know about. While you are there, introduce yourselves to everyone.

For new readers that have only read the messages displayed on the main page, take a look through the archives, a substantial amount of information has been put online in the past year. The archives can be accessed by using the links found in the menus on the right hand side of the page.

Posted in General | 962 Comments

Spending our dollars when everyone else is slashing

From the Daily Record:

Corzine: No new budget cuts, at least for now

New Jersey will not follow New York City in reopening its budget to make additional spending cuts in response to the Wall Street turmoil, Gov. Jon S. Corzine indicated Wednesday.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg Tuesday directed city agencies to cut spending by about $500 million in the fiscal 2009 budget year, which began July 1. Bloomberg’s order for more spending cuts came after $1.3 billion was already removed from this year’s budget, said Marc Lavorgna, a spokesman for the mayor.

“Approximately 10 percent of all city tax revenue comes from Wall Street,” Lavorgna said.

Financial services are also a major sector of the New Jersey economy. According to state labor department statistics, some 266,000 New Jerseyans work in the sector — down 8 percent in the past year, but still accounting for one of every 15 nonfarm jobs.

Corzine has called New Jersey “vulnerable” to the Wall Street turmoil and has projected a sharp decline in tax revenue coming to the state. Nonetheless, he’s holding off for now on making more budget cuts, his staff said.

“The governor had the foresight to recognize that the national economy was in a downturn, and he took unprecedented measures to ensure fiscal responsibility in his budget by reducing overall spending, cutting the size of government and dedicating money to reduce state debt,” said Robert Corrales, Corzine’s spokesman.

In a prepared statement Tuesday, Corzine himself said this year’s budget is the first one in state history to cut hundreds of millions of dollars of spending. He said he had not seen numbers to warrant reopening the budget but added “we will take responsible action as the facts unfold.”

Across the Hudson River, New York City Budget Director Mark Page in a letter to city agency directors predicted there will be fewer finance sector jobs well into the future and cautioned this will hurt the city’s budget because of its reliance on tax revenue from workers in the financial services industry.

Even though the full effect of the financial crisis on the city’s budget won’t be known for some time, Page told department heads that New York must start cutting costs now because forecasts show billion-dollar budget deficits in each of the next three fiscal years.

“(O)ur forecast future deficits will not be cured, as has been the case for the last few years, by an improvement in that forecast and higher than expected revenues,” Page wrote.

“We assume that every job loss on Wall Street causes two other job losses somewhere else in the city economy,” Lavorgna said.

Assemblyman Joseph Malone III, R-Burlington, reiterated his call Wednesday to reopen the state’s current budget and look for potential areas to cut.

“If Bloomberg can do something similar to what I’m asking for, why can’t the governor do it?” asked Malone, who sits on the Assembly Budget Committee. “I’d hate like hell to wake up in two months and have serious financial problems in the state because we didn’t stand up and take a look at our budget.”

Posted in Economics, Politics, Property Taxes | 520 Comments

Housing … Grim

From Reuters:

Housing grim as financial rescue debate rages

Prices of U.S. existing homes suffered a record drop in August and the rate of sales tumbled, offering little sign of improvement in the source of the financial crisis in the United States.

The pace of existing home sales decreased 2.2 percent to an annual pace of 4.91 million units while the median national home price declined a record 9.5 percent to $203,100, the National Association of Realtors said on Wednesday.

In what would normally be a potentially bright spot, the overstock of homes for sale shrank. However, the trade group said as many as 2 in 5 home sales were by borrowers who have seen their property lose value or are facing foreclosure.

“The NAR estimates that 35-to-40 percent of all sales are of distressed property, so underlying private activity is weaker than the headlines (imply) and there is little sign of imminent improvement,” Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics.

Economists polled by Reuters were expecting home resales to fall to a 4.93 million-unit pace from the 5.00 million unit rate initially reported for July, which was revised to a 5.02 million unit pace.

The inventory of existing homes for sale fell 7.0 percent to 4.26 million from the record-high overstock reported in July.

From the AP:

US home sales, prices fall in August

A record decline in U.S. home prices in August attracted more buyers in some areas and led to a sizable decline in the number of unsold homes on the market, the National Association of Realtors said Wednesday.

The median price fell 9.5 percent to $203,100, the largest price decline on records dating to 1999. As prices fall, buyers are taking advantage of steep discounts, especially in hard-hit markets like California, Nevada and Florida.

“Time and price are the real cures for the housing market slump,” said Mike Larson, an analyst at Weiss Research.

The inventory of unsold homes fell 7 percent to 4.3 million, down from the all-time record of 4.6 million in July. That’s a 10.4-month supply at the current sales pace.

The decline, however, merits only “a small round of applause” because around 5 months of inventory is a more typical level, wrote Global Insight economist Patrick Newport. Also, many homeowners who don’t have to sell are likely keeping their properties off the market. At the same time, thousands of foreclosed properties are tied up in court and are not for sale yet.

Lawrence Yun, the trade group’s chief economist, said he hopes the downward trend in inventories continues because, “home prices will not stabilize as long as inventories remain high.”

Inventories have been driven higher by a massive wave of mortgage foreclosures, especially on risky loans.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 212 Comments

Home Prices Keep Falling

From Bloomberg:

U.S. Housing Prices Tumble on Home Mortgage Scarcity

U.S. home prices tumbled in July as the credit crisis that led to this month’s toppling of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. tightened mortgage standards and slashed real estate lending.

Home purchase prices dropped 5.3 percent, seasonally adjusted, from a year earlier, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight said today in a report. The one-month decline from June was 0.6 percent, said Washington-based Ofheo.

Eight out of nine U.S. regions showed declines for the year as lenders tightened requirements after banks posted $523 billion in mortgage-related losses and writedowns worldwide. U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson this week asked Congress to approve $700 billion to buy the type of investments that forced Lehman Brothers to file for bankruptcy and American International Group Inc. to accept a federal takeover.

“You’re still looking at the residual effects of a marketplace that is starved for mortgage money,” Michael Aronstein, president of New York-based Marketfield Asset Management, said in an interview.

The decline in July from June was greater than the 0.2 percent average estimate of 15 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. Ofheo now is part of the Federal Housing Finance Agency created by Congress in July to oversee Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own or guarantee $5.4 trillion of mortgage debt. The mortgage buyers were seized by the government two weeks ago to prevent their collapse.

Prices fell the most from a year ago in the study’s western region that includes California and Washington, down 18 percent. Florida, Georgia, the Carolinas and states in the South Atlantic region fell 5.2 percent, Ofheo said. In New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania the drop was 3.5 percent.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate, New Jersey Real Estate | 294 Comments

“Oh my goodness, this payment is more than I thought it would be”

From the Press of Atlantic City:

Census supports feeling New Jersey ‘cost of living is out of control’

Nanci David fulfilled her dream of owning a home in 2004, moving into a two-story yellow house on a quiet Pleasantville street.
But now, the single mom said she’s thinking of a future outside New Jersey. Her housing expenses have been escalating, she said, and she still has another 27 years left on her mortgage, which is set at $1,530 per month.

“I do like New Jersey, but the cost of living is out of control,” said David, 27, a Honduran immigrant who works two jobs to support her 7-year-old son. “My salary hasn’t really changed. I’ve been looking at moving to other places, maybe Florida or South Carolina.”

U.S. Census figures released today only bolster the perception that the Garden State is the land of high-priced living.

New Jersey homeowners last year paid the second-highest costs in the nation in maintaining a house with a mortgage, or $2,278 per month. Only Californians paid more, at $2,314 per month.

Meanwhile, the median price of a month’s rent in New Jersey, including utility and fuel costs, was the third-highest nationwide, at $1,026. Hawaii ($1,194) and California ($1,078) were first and second.
More than 46 percent of New Jersey mortgage holders and nearly half of all renters paid 30 percent or more of their monthly incomes on housing costs, 2007 census data show. Nationwide, only 37.5 percent of homeowners paid 30 percent or more of their income on mortgage and housing costs.

“Everybody has bills, everybody has mortgages … and it seems like we’re at the highest with taxes. We’re at a breaking point in New Jersey,” said Jerry Cantrell, president of the New Jersey Taxpayers’ Association. “It has got to be turned around, or we’re going to be headed in a spiraling fiscal mess.”

Corretta Stringfield, a financial counselor with Tri-County Community Action Partnership, a Bridgeton agency that assists homeowners, said her clients often don’t realize how much it costs each month to own a home.

“They think, ‘I can afford this’ because they are qualified, and then they find out down the line, ‘Oh my goodness, this payment is more than I thought it would be,” Stringfield said. “We make sure to drive home that the price in maintaining a home includes principal, interest, taxes and insurance. And while the prices of homes in New Jersey might be declining, the taxes aren’t.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 457 Comments

“You cannot just turn over $700 billion of taxpayer money and not insist that that taxpayer is going to be protected in this.”

From the Wall Street Journal:

Lawmakers Battle Over Rescue Plan
By GREG HITT, DAMIAN PALETTA and DEBORAH SOLOMON
SEPTEMBER 22, 2008

Lawmakers are scrambling to put their mark on the Bush administration’s $700 billion plan to save financial markets — a fast-moving test of wills that could reshape one of the biggest bailouts in U.S. history.

There’s no sign yet that Congress will delay or derail the proposal. Democrats are looking to add provisions that include beefed-up congressional oversight, aid for individual homeowners and changes to bankruptcy laws.

Some of the measures are opposed by the administration. Perhaps the biggest looming fight is over Democratic efforts to require the program’s participants to curb what they pay their executives.

Last week, as deep new fissures opened in global financial markets, the U.S. Treasury unveiled a plan to spend up to $700 billion to buy soured mortgages and mortgage-related securities from financial institutions. In many respects, the financial sector last week all but ceased to function.

In discussions with lawmakers late Sunday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson prodded Congress to move forward, voicing worry about how financial markets will react Monday and whether those institutions still standing could be in for more turmoil, officials said. Since unveiling the plan, the administration has kept up pressure for rapid action, in hopes that relieving banks of their troublesome holdings will help lending markets to stabilize.

The bailout is raising thorny questions that could be tough to address as the bill speeds through Congress. Until this proposal, the government’s response to the worst financial crisis in 80 years had been led largely by the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, with Congress consulted often only after the fact. As a result, lawmakers view the bailout plan as a chance to reassert their authority. Many are unnerved by Treasury’s request for a blank check with few conditions.

The proposal has also stirred a populist backlash, with many members of Congress saying the bill needs to be better geared to Main Street than Wall Street.

Another likely area for compromise is aid for homeowners. The administration already believes its plan will provide relief to borrowers even though the specific legislative language doesn’t address the question. Because Treasury will own mortgage-backed securities and actual home loans, Mr. Paulson said on ABC’s “This Week” that the government will be able to exert pressure on mortgage servicers to modify terms.

The debate could expose a peculiar irony in the government’s rescue planning, because taxpayers are now both creditors and debtors in the housing mess. While some taxpayers would benefit from attempts to aid homeowners by modifying mortgages or easing the bankruptcy process, others could be hurt if those moves increase the overall cost of the bailout.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 623 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion

This is the time and place to post observations about your local areas, comments on news stories or the New Jersey housing market, open house reports, etc. If you have any questions you wanted to ask earlier in the week but never posted them up, let’s have them. Also a good place to post suggestions, requests for information, criticism, and praise.

For readers that have never commented, there is a link at the top of each message that is typically labelled “[#] Comments“. Go ahead and give that a click, you might be missing out on a world of information you didn’t know about. While you are there, introduce yourselves to everyone.

For new readers that have only read the messages displayed on the main page, take a look through the archives, a substantial amount of information has been put online in the past year. The archives can be accessed by using the links found in the menus on the right hand side of the page.

Posted in General | 1,023 Comments

“It’s basically a disaster for tri-state real estate”

From Bloomberg:

New Jersey’s `Wall Street West’ Quakes Amid Namesake’s Turmoil

Jersey City, where New Jersey bet it could transform warehouse and factory tracts into a “Wall Street West” across the Hudson River from Manhattan, was paying off. That is, until its investment bank tenants started collapsing.

Many of the towers that have sprung up in the past decade on Jersey City’s waterfront are filled with satellite offices for the largest investment-banking firms. More than 3,000 employees of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. work in New Jersey’s second-largest city.

Lehman this week filed for the biggest bankruptcy, while Merrill agreed to a takeover by Bank of America Corp. Those firms joined Bear Stearns Cos. and at least 20 banks and credit unions nationally that couldn’t survive this year’s credit crunch.

“It’s basically a disaster for tri-state real estate,” said Andy Merin, vice chairman at Cushman & Wakefield in East Rutherford, New Jersey. “Financial companies drive this region. Clearly of all the markets in New Jersey, Jersey City is the most dependent on New York City and the financial arena.”

Jersey City’s Hudson River waterfront has attracted securities firms since the early 1980s, sparking a building boom for office space that now totals 17 million square feet (5.2 million square meters), more than in downtown Atlanta or Pittsburgh, according to the city’s economic development agency.

GovernorJon Corzine, a first-term Democrat who ran Goldman Sachs Group Inc. from 1994 to 1999, said yesterday he was watching to see if the financial firms cut any New Jersey-based jobs. As much as a third of the state’s economy is dependent on Wall Street, he said.

“I’m worried about the state budget and the state economy in the context of the very dramatic restructuring that we’re seeing on Wall Street,” said Corzine, 61. “We are vulnerable, there is no question about that.”

For Jersey City, the likely impact is layoffs and delayed expansion, said James Hughes, dean of the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey. Lost revenue from the banks is a larger issue for the entire state, he said. Merrill, for example, has 6,500 employees at its complex in Hopewell and many state residents commute to work at the firm’s Manhattan headquarters.

“We are at risk,” Hughes said. “The lives of individual employees that potentially lose their job and the income losses to the state, particularly the bonus payments, play a big part in the state’s income tax and revenue.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 572 Comments

On the hook for AIG

From the Wall Street Journal:

U.S. to Take Over AIG in $85 Billion Bailout; Central Banks Inject Cash as Credit Dries Up
Emergency Loan Effectively Gives Government Control of Insurer; Historic Move Would Cap 10 Days That Reshaped U.S. Finance
By MATTHEW KARNITSCHNIG, DEBORAH SOLOMON, LIAM PLEVEN and JON E. HILSENRATH

The U.S. government seized control of American International Group Inc. — one of the world’s biggest insurers — in an $85 billion deal that signaled the intensity of its concerns about the danger a collapse could pose to the financial system.

The step marks a dramatic turnabout for the federal government, which had been strongly resisting overtures from AIG for an emergency loan or some intervention that would prevent the insurer from falling into bankruptcy. Just last weekend, the government essentially pulled the plug on Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., allowing the big investment bank to go under instead of giving it financial support. This time, the government decided AIG truly was too big to fail.

The U.S. negotiators drove a hard bargain. Under terms hammered out Tuesday night, the Fed will lend up to $85 billion to AIG, and the U.S. government will effectively get a 79.9% equity stake in the insurer in the form of warrants called equity participation notes. The two-year loan will carry an interest rate of Libor plus 8.5 percentage points. (Libor, the London interbank offered rate, is a common short-term lending benchmark.)

The loan is secured by AIG’s assets, including its profitable insurance businesses, giving the Fed some protection even if markets continue to sink. And if AIG rebounds, taxpayers could reap a big profit through the government’s equity stake.

“This loan will facilitate a process under which AIG will sell certain of its businesses in an orderly manner, with the least possible disruption to the overall economy,” the Fed said in a statement.

It puts the government in control of a private insurer — a historic development, particularly considering that AIG isn’t directly regulated by the federal government. The Fed took the highly unusual step using legal authority granted in the Federal Reserve Act, which allows it to lend to nonbanks under “unusual and exigent” circumstances, something it invoked when Bear Stearns Cos. was rescued in March.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 504 Comments

“Good luck getting a loan.”

From Bloomberg:

Mortgage Seekers Find Rates Are Down, Credit Standards Tighter

U.S. mortgage rates are dropping. Good luck getting a loan.

Existing home prices have fallen 7.7 percent since their July 2006 high and rates dropped below 6 percent last week for the first time in more than three months. The obstacle for people ready to buy is finding a willing lender, said Suzanne Bach, senior vice president of New York-based Guardhill Financial Corp., and an 18-year home lending veteran.

“Nobody really wants to take risk anymore,” Bach said in an interview. “Deals are getting really hard to do now.”

Lenders including Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. keep requiring higher credit scores, bigger cash down payments, and more income than was needed to buy a home during the five-year housing boom. Astoria Federal Savings, a Lake Success, New York-based lender that holds mortgages on its books rather than selling them to investors, has even started discounting annual employee bonuses in calculating income.

About 75 percent of U.S. banks tightened standards on mortgage lending to the most credit-worthy borrowers in the three months ended in July, according to the Federal Reserve’s quarterly Senior Loan Officer Survey released Aug. 11.

The average U.S. 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 5.78 percent yesterday, down from 6.08 percent the week before, according to Bankrate.com. The Fed is scheduled to meet Tuesday and may lower its key rate to 1.75 percent from 2 percent which may reduce mortgage rates further.

“Tighter standards assure the loans are less likely to fail, but also have had the unfortunate effect of limiting the ability of some first-time home buyers to enter the market,” said Sara Tinsley Demarest, spokeswoman for the Washington-based Mortgage Bankers Association.

The credit squeeze is contributing to falling home sales. In July, the National Association of Realtors’ index of pending home resales fell 3.2 percent, a decline NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun blamed on “overly stringent lending criteria.” The index is down 6.8 percent since July 2007.

“The most difficult thing now is the appraisals are being scrutinized so much more than they have ever been,” Stockert said. “The higher the sale price, the more scrutiny that is happening. We’re talking two or three appraisals on the same property.”

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 467 Comments

Crisis!

Lehman…

Merrill…

Is there anything more to say?

(Update: 24 hours later and 650+ comments, I guess there was more to say.)

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, Risky Lending | 655 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion

This is the time and place to post observations about your local areas, comments on news stories or the New Jersey housing market, open house reports, etc. If you have any questions you wanted to ask earlier in the week but never posted them up, let’s have them. Also a good place to post suggestions, requests for information, criticism, and praise.

For readers that have never commented, there is a link at the top of each message that is typically labelled “[#] Comments“. Go ahead and give that a click, you might be missing out on a world of information you didn’t know about. While you are there, introduce yourselves to everyone.

For new readers that have only read the messages displayed on the main page, take a look through the archives, a substantial amount of information has been put online in the past year. The archives can be accessed by using the links found in the menus on the right hand side of the page.

Posted in General | 656 Comments

The worst still to come

From the Jersey Journal:

Prediction for Hudson: Housing crisis will get worse

The subprime mortgage crisis has not hit Hudson County as hard as other parts of the state, but analysts say there could be more pain – and more foreclosures – in the near future.

According to a report released earlier this month by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New Jersey had the fifth highest ratio in the country of subprime mortgages in some stage of foreclosure as of June – three out of every 1,000 housing units.

udson’s ratio is slightly lower than the state’s, but the county ranks fifth in absolute number of subprime mortgages in foreclosure with 695, or 6.7 percent of the statewide total, the report said. Essex and Union counties account for a combined 25 percent of the subprime-related foreclosures.

Subprime mortgages, typically given to borrowers with poor credit histories, carry adjustable rates that can lead to rapidly escalating payments.

The Fed’s study found that most foreclosures are clustered in low-income neighborhoods. That’s no surprise to Emad Nairooz, a broker with Top Quality Realty, a Jersey City real estate company that specializes in foreclosed properties.

“In my opinion, in Hudson County the area that is getting hit bad is Jersey City in the Greenville area,” Nairooz said. “And it’s growing like crazy.”

Nairooz said that one typical Greenville property, a three-family home that was purchased for $400,000 at the end of 2006, now can’t find a buyer at an asking price that is less than $140,000.

RealtyTrac, a company that tracks foreclosures across the country, reported this week that there were 4,622 filings in New Jersey in July, 11.2 percent more than a year ago. There was an 8 percent increase nationwide.

Meanwhile, foreclosure sales conducted by the Sheriff’s Office jumped from fewer than 200 from January to July in 2007 to 519 over the same period this year, according to spokesman Bob Knapp.

Still, Jeff Kaplowitz, an agent with Century 21 Plaza Realty in Jersey City and former chairman of the Jersey City Planning Board, says the worst may not have arrived.

“We’re not being affected that greatly,” he said, adding that the local housing market could dive early next year because of layoffs in the financial industry.

“As New York City goes, we will go,” Kaplowitz said. “All those brokers who get 40 to 100 percent bonuses in December and January won’t have that disposable income, and that will ripple through the New York economy.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 313 Comments

Not really so different here

From the Record:

Delinquent loans on residential properties rise

The delinquency rate for mortgage loans, the percentage of foreclosures starting and the percentage of loans in foreclosure on New Jersey residential properties all rose in the second quarter, the Mortgage Bankers Association said Friday.

The delinquency rate increased to 5.43 percent and the percentage of loans that started foreclosure this quarter rose to 0.91 percent. The percentage of loans in foreclosure at the end of the quarter increased to 2.7 percent.

Subprime mortgages on New Jersey properties showed the most trouble. Delinquency rates for subprime adjustable-rate mortgage loans and fixed-rate loans climbed to 21.19 percent and 13.55 percent, respectively. Foreclosure rates starting this quarter on subprime ARM loans increased to 6.8 percent and foreclosure rates starting on subprime fixed loans rose to 2.02 percent.

New Jersey ranked 29th in delinquencies and 12th in foreclosure starts with 16 percent nonprime borrowers compared with a 19 percent U.S. average.

But the source of trouble in the mortgage market has shifted from subprime loans made to borrowers with poor credit to homeowners who had solid credit but took out exotic loans with ballooning monthly payments.

“The problem that policymakers and Wall Street once assured us was ‘contained’ to sub-prime mortgages has proven to be anything but,” Mike Larson, a real estate analyst with Weiss Research, said in a research note.

The latest quarterly figures broke records for late payments, homes entering the foreclosure process and the inventory of loans in foreclosure. The trade group’s records date back to 1979.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 397 Comments