Existing Home Sales at 9 Year Low

From the AP:

Existing Home Sales Decline

Sales of existing homes fell for the sixth straight month in January, dropping to the slowest sales pace on record. Median home prices were also down and many analysts predicted further price declines in the months ahead given high levels of unsold homes.

The National Association of Realtors said Monday that sales of single-family homes and condominiums dropped by 0.4 percent last month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.89 million units. That was the slowest sales pace, going back to 1999, and was seen as evidence that the steepest slump in housing in a quarter-century has yet to hit bottom.

The median price of a home sold in January slid to $201,100, a drop of 4.6 percent from a year ago. Particularly alarming, analysts said, was the fact that the inventory of unsold homes jumped to a 10.3 months’ supply, meaning it would take that long to sell the 4.19 million homes on the market at the January sales pace.

That was up from 9.7 months in December and just below a two-decade high of 10.5 months hit in October. During the peak of the housing boom in 2005, the supply of homes relative to sales stood at 4.5 months.

“With sales weak and inventories at extraordinarily high levels, prices are likely to fall a lot more,” said Joel Naroff, chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors. “Eventually, sellers will end their denial and realize that if they want to unload their homes, they will have to cut prices even more.”

Analysts said one of the problems was a rising tide of mortgage foreclosures, which is pushing even more unsold homes back on the already glutted market.

Sales of existing homes fell by 12.7 percent in 2007, the biggest decline in 25 years, and are down 20 percent from their all-time high set in 2005, the final year of a five-year housing boom that saw sales and prices soar to record levels. Over the past two years, housing has been in a steep downturn made worse by a severe credit crunch as financial institutions tightened their lending standards in reaction to their multibillion-dollar losses on mortgages that have gone into default.

“With prices expected to continue dropping and banks leery to make loans, few prospective homeowners feel now is the time to buy,” said Michael Gregory, an economist at BMO Capital Markets.

“Expect sales and prices to keep falling,” said Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist for High Frequency Economics. “There is no end in sight for the housing disaster.”

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 353 Comments

A “challenged housing market that has yet to bottom out”

From the Otteau Group:

HOME SALES POST WEAK JANUARY

The pace of New Jersey home sales sank to a 4 year low in January raising serious questions about what’s ahead for the Spring housing market. Adding to the uncertainty are concerns about rising oil prices, warning signs that a full blown economic recession may be approaching and the sudden reversal of mortgage rate trends which are now rising despite recent rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. According to Freddie Mac’s latest Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®), the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 6.04 percent for the week ending February 21, 2008, up from 5.72 percent one week earlier and from 5.48% on January 24th. These increases make housing more expensive to home buyers and weaken housing affordability leading into the Spring selling season.

Also in January the number of homes for sale increased for the first time since August signaling that Unsold Inventory will likely rise further as Spring approaches. All of this adds up to a challenged housing market that has yet to bottom out and begin a recovery.

Posted in Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 53 Comments

Recession calls grow louder

From Bloomberg:

Recession in U.S. More Likely in 2008, Economists’ Survey Finds

The proportion of economists who forecast a U.S. recession this year more than doubled in three months, to 45 percent, according to a survey by the National Association for Business Economics.

Of those, a majority expect the downturn to be “relatively muted,” according to the poll of 49 professional forecasters taken Jan. 25 to Feb. 13. Less than 20 percent predicted a downturn in the previous poll completed Nov. 6.

The spillover from the biggest housing slump in a quarter century, turmoil in financial markets and higher energy prices will cause growth to slow to an annual pace of 0.4 percent this quarter and 1 percent in the second quarter, the survey found.

“U.S. economic growth is expected to slow to a crawl in the first half,” Ellen Hughes-Cromwick, the group’s president and chief economist at Ford Motor Co., said in a statement.

The economy will expand 1.8 percent in the year ending in 2008’s fourth quarter, according to the survey. That compares with predictions of 2.6 percent in November.

The survey’s median forecast for fourth-quarter growth compares with 2008 forecasts of 1.7 percent in a Bloomberg News survey taken this month.

The housing slump and credit availability were cited by forecasters as hurting growth this year. More than 60 percent of the economists said the housing recession will have a major negative effect on consumer spending.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 226 Comments

Playing the waiting game

From Bloomberg:

Homebuyer Patience Triumphs in a Waiting Game: John F. Wasik

With no bottom in sight for the U.S. housing market, buyers are in game-show mode.

There are plenty of deals out there, yet you have to make some decisions if you are buying a new home. Choices flash in front of you as if a host is badgering you to decide your next move. Do you wait for prices to fall further? Or do you buy now and take the builder’s incentives or their financing?

Whatever strategy you adopt, you will need to ignore some of the bells and whistles being offered and focus on price. You don’t want to be caught buying a home today that may be marked down $50,000 next month.

With more than 4 million unsold homes on the market, the buyer with good credit and cash for a down payment can do well.

Builders are doing whatever they can to move properties. In February, almost half surveyed said they cut prices, according to the National Association of Homebuilders, a Washington-based trade group. More than half “reported offering optional items at no charge and 44 percent said they paid all or some of the closing costs.”

Itching to buy? Let’s say you are considering a second or vacation home. You are confident that the market has bottomed and you don’t want to miss out on the best prices.

Playing the waiting game? If you delay your purchase, you may be rewarded. Home prices are forecast to fall 12 percent this year, according to Richard Syron, chief executive officer of Freddie Mac, the second-largest provider of money for U.S. home loans. Housing starts may plunge 22 percent in 2008 and remain at their lowest level in 16 years, he said in a speech to the homebuilders association on Feb. 13.

Prices are going to fall a lot more than Freddie Mac’s forecast 12 percent in the most overpriced areas, which may experience 50 percent declines or more.

Patience is a virtue in this market. It will also net you a better deal if you can turn off your game-show impulses.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 8 Comments

Live and learn

From BusinessWeek:

The Post-Bubble Curriculum

Educators call them “teachable moments,” and whether the students are in third grade or grad school the idea is the same—to draw lessons from real-world events. The subprime mortgage meltdown and the ongoing shocks to the global economy have created a multibillion-dollar teachable moment in business schools, where students dissect exactly what happened and the lessons that can be drawn to prevent similar economic earthquakes.

Indeed, the problems that began with the implosion of the subprime market were being flagged by some business school researchers several years before financial institutions started reporting extensive writeoffs of subprime mortgages in 2007. But as the effects of the crisis continue to spread, terms such as CDOs and SIVs have become part of the lexicon in many mainstream business school courses covering such areas as real estate finance, ethics, and fixed-income securities.

For instance, at Washington University in St. Louis, a graduate-level real estate finance course used a case study on how sophisticated debt instruments magnified the effects of the subprime crisis. Meanwhile, MBA students at Miami University’s Farmer School of Business examined Countrywide Financial’s (CFC) fire sale merger with Bank of America (BAC) as part of their enterprise risk management studies.

For the short term, at least, the subprime meltdown and debt crisis are going to be one of the hot topics for discussion in MBA and undergrad business courses, according to business school deans and other academics. But it will take the full unwinding and some historical perspective to see whether the crisis will permanently change the business school curriculum.

“I’m not sure whether or not new courses will be created,” says Paul Portney, dean of the Eller Graduate School of Management at the University of Arizona. “But in the credit risk modeling class there’s no question that the examples would be drawn exactly from what we’ve seen the past couple of years. There won’t be a top-notch business school that won’t find a way to work this in.”

Posted in Economics, General, National Real Estate | Comments Off on Live and learn

Weekend Open Discussion – Part II

Now Open, Part II!

Prior weekend thread closed due to comment overflow.

Posted in General | 304 Comments

Relisting = Cheating

From CNBC:

Re-listing: I Think It’s Cheating–What Do You Think?

There’s been a lot of talk in the blogosphere lately about the phenomenon of “re-listing”, and so it behooves me to weigh in. “Re-listing” is when an agent takes a property that’s been sitting on the market a bit longer than one might like and removes it from the market, only to “re-list” it days or even minutes later as a “fresh” listing.

As homes sit on the market longer and longer these days, it’s a tactic that many real estate agents say is legal, helpful, and really a no-brainer.

The problem is that despite all the news of the housing downturn, for some reason buyers still like to see “days on market” under 30 before they’re willing to step in. Anything above that is a turn-off. There are ways to find out, if you know where to dig, what the total days on-market has been, but the average real e-surfer probably doesn’t know how.

I beg to differ. Here’s my opinion (which I’m allowed to give here on the blog because it’s a blog, not my other job as a business journalist on CNBC): That’s rot. It is cheating. It’s one thing to change the perception of a home by staging it, dressing it up a bit, but fudging the numbers of “days on market” is just as bad as leaving out the fact that the basement floods periodically. There’s a reason that number is there, so people can gauge interest and understand if that home is correctly priced compared to its neighborhood comps.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 13 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion

This is the time and place to post observations about your local areas, comments on news stories or the New Jersey housing market, open house reports, etc. If you have any questions you wanted to ask earlier in the week but never posted them up, let’s have them. Also a good place to post suggestions, requests for information, criticism, and praise.

For readers that have never commented, there is a link at the top of each message that is typically labelled “[#] Comments“. Go ahead and give that a click, you might be missing out on a world of information you didn’t know about. While you are there, introduce yourselves to everyone.

For new readers that have only read the messages displayed on the main page, take a look through the archives, a substantial amount of information has been put online in the past year. The archives can be accessed by using the links found in the menus on the right hand side of the page.

Posted in General | 318 Comments

Relisting – “It’s Got to Stop”

The morning after: I find myself in a familiar position. My inbox is filled with a mix of hate mail from Realtors and love(?) mail from consumers. Realtors all seem to think this practice is perfectly acceptable, some go so far as to say it is their responsibility. Consumers are angry as hell, and rightfully so.

Note to other Realtors: If you want to be treated with respect and trusted, act in a way that begets those traits. Attempting to salvage trust and respect with half-ass justifications for unethical behavior? Is it any wonder why real estate agents are lumped into the same category as used-car salesmen and ambulance chasers?

Note to New Jersey Realtors: Stopping this practice is now my personal mission. I will go to no end to have this practiced stopped. From the local boards, to the NJAR, the legislators, the real estate commission, the DOBI, etc. Hell hath no fury…

From ABC News/Nightline:

Buyer Beware: Unsold Homes Are Often ‘Re-listed’
By VICKI MABREY and MELIA PATRIA
Feb. 20, 2008

If you’re looking to sell your home fast, Minnesota realtor Joe Niece believes he’s your guy.

“I’m probably the most aggressive person in the entire state,” he said. “Maybe even the United States.”

Niece says he will sell your home 30 percent faster than average market time.

“I do probably ten times more than a good many of my competitors when it comes to marketing,” he said.

Niece sold one home in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, after just 27 days on the market, and another house after only 15 days. “I can tell every single seller that I have, that I did everything to sell their house that I would have done for my mom’s house or my house,” Niece said.

How does he do it? The problem is, the figures he cites are not technically accurate. The first house in Eden Prairie actually lingered on the slumping market for 99 days. And the one that sold in 15 days actually sat for 126 days.

It’s a tactic called “re-listing,” which is legal and more common than you think.

Here’s how it works: Niece cancels house listings when they reach 70 days on the market, and then re-lists them as new, with 0 days on the market.

“So, when the buyer says, ‘Well, how long’s this one been on the market?’ And he looks at a report that normally an agent or a buyer would have when they’re showing houses, it only shows the current time on the market,” Niece said. “So a buyer’s going to be way more positive as they look through a home that says 25 days versus 125 days.”

Niece believes that re-listing is an important marketing tool in tough periods like this, because first impressions are crucial.

But real estate blogger James Bednar says re-listing is simply unethical. “As a buyer, it does make me angry,” he said. “I need to know how long a home’s been on the market or what the original price is.”

“Hiding that market information from consumers is wrong, and it’s got to stop,” he added.

Bednar started blogging in 2005 after growing aggravated with realtors during his own house-hunting search.

“The issue here is that when a re-listed home is sold, it skews the market transaction data,” he said. “When an agent typically says they can sell a home in 30 or 60 days, is that really true? If they’ve re-listed a home, that might not necessarily be true.” In an effort to gain access to market data, he actually got a real estate license and a membership with his local listing service. With a few key strokes he can find the true history of any listing in his northern New Jersey neighborhood.

“The most common outcome is probably that a buyer overpays for a home,” he said. “I think it’s only a matter of time before a buyer who buys a home under these false pretenses realizes it and perhaps sues the real estate agent for misrepresenting a house.”

Niece said most buyers don’t understand that more than 100 days on the market is actually average market time. “They perceive that 20 days is an average market time because for the last seven years that’s what they’ve heard,” he said. “It would only be cooking the numbers if buyers’ agents couldn’t easily get the numbers.”

Across the country in Sacramento, California, the problem got so bad that Michael Lyon, CEO of Lyon Real Estate, blew the whistle after he noticed that one third of all “new” listings were re-listings.

“This is just silliness,” he said. “I’m sorry, but you can’t pull the wool over the buyer’s eyes.”

Lyon forced his regional listing service to set a new standard. “We let people see all the previous listings, period, there are no secrets,” he said. “We want the buyer to know everything about all the times it was listed, so we can allow them to truly investigate the home.”

The National Association of Realtors says it hasn’t seen a need for regulation on re-listing because it is not aware of a problem. Lyon says buyers should ask their agents to get the entire listing history.

“You want to know all the times the house has been listed in the last two years,” he said, adding that days on the market are “very important” to buyers.

“It allows them to ask other questions,” he said. “If it has been on a long time, why? Why is this happening? And those answers will allow them to make a fair offer. ”

Posted in National Real Estate | 441 Comments

Zandi: Home prices to fall 20%

From Reuters:

Economy.com sees home prices down 20 percent

A rapidly deteriorating U.S. economy will cause home prices to drop by 20 percent peak-to-trough, a leading economist said on Wednesday.

Mark Zandi, chief economist and co-founder of Moody’s Economy.com, said he also expects a recession in the first half of this year.

Zandi, speaking at the Reuters Housing Summit in New York, said this is a “significant” change from the Moody’s Economy.com outlook published in December, which called for a 13 percent drop.

He expects home sales to hit bottom this spring, housing starts to reach a nadir this summer, and house prices to trough in the spring of 2009.

“Three months ago, I expected the economy to skirt a recession. Now, I expect it to suffer a recession (in the) first half of 2008,” he said.

Zandi said rapidly rising foreclosures is high on his list of significant problems facing the U.S. economy.

“The surge in foreclosures and delinquencies on mortgages is accelerating, not abating, and obviously we are at levels we have never seen before,” he said. “This is a significant problem for the economy.”

The surge in foreclosures is putting further downward pressure on the housing market because it adds to the inventory of homes for sale, which is already at a lofty level.

“This puts further pressure on house prices and therefore on the ability and willingness of consumers to spend,” he said.

Zandi said households that are going through foreclosures are also under tremendous pressure, having to rein in their spending very significantly.

“They are also having a measurable impact on spending, particularly areas of the country where foreclosure problems are more serious,” he said.

For each foreclosure on a street block, it reduces the value of all homes on that block by almost 1.5 percent, he said.

Posted in General | 44 Comments

“[Subprime] defaults are spiking well before resets come into play”

From CNN/Money:

Subprime loans defaulting even before resets

For months, we’ve fretted about the Armageddon that will hit when subprime adjustable rate mortgages start resetting to much higher interest rates.

What’s happening is even worse: Many of these loans are defaulting well before their rates increase.

Defaults for subprime loans issued in 2007 – none of which have reset yet – hit 11.2 percent in November. That represents perhaps 300,000 households, and is twice the default rate that 2006 loans had 10 months after being issued, according to Friedman, Billings Ramsey analyst Michael Youngblood.

Defaults are spiking well before resets come into play thanks to the lax lending environment of the past few years. Many borrowers were approved for mortgages that they had little chance of affording, even at the low-interest teaser rates .

“I was rather shocked by the characteristics of the 2007 loans,” said Youngblood.

Originally, concerns about these loans focused on the fact that that most homeowners wouldn’t survive such pricey resets. In late 2006, the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL), predicted that 2.2 million subprime ARM borrowers would lose their homes in the following two years due to reset shock.

For instance, in both 2006 and 2007, well over 40 percent of subprime borrowers were awarded mortgages with either little or no documentation of their ability to pay. With these so-called “liar loans,” borrowers did not have to show proof of either earnings or assets.

And even when borrowers did go on the record about their earning power, it didn’t bode well. Both 2006 and 2007 ushered in a large proportion of loans with high debt-to-income ratios (DTI), which indicates the percentage of gross income required to pay debt. In 2007 subprime originations, the DTI hit 42.1 percent, up from 41.1 percent in 2006. Borrowers were simply taking on more debt that they could afford.

What’s more, many borrowers started out with low- or no-down payment loans, which left them with almost no equity in their home.

During the boom, rapid price appreciation meant borrowers built up home equity quickly. That minimized defaults, since owners could draw from that equity to pay their bills – including their mortgages – through home equity loans, lines of credit or cash-out refinancings.

But prices fell starting in 2006,leaving borrowers with less home equity to draw upon when they run into financial problems.

Owners with mortgages worth more than their homes simply began walking away from their homes when costs become unmanageable.

“Lenders felt they had to take the loans to preserve their access [to the rest of the loan pool],” he said. They were willing to accept some risky subprime loans so that the mortgage brokers would also send them safer prime and Alt-A loans.

Of course that’s a bet that went bad. And it’s likely to get worse as resets for ARMs issued in 2006 and 2007 kick in this year.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate, Price Reduced | 231 Comments

Can the Fed prevent recession?

From the Wall Street Journal:

Our Economic Dilemma
By MARTIN FELDSTEIN
February 20, 2008; Page A15

Although it is too soon to tell whether the United States has entered a recession, there is mounting evidence that a recession has in fact begun. Key measures of economic activity stopped growing in December and January or actually began to decline. The collapse of house prices and the crisis in the credit markets continue to depress the real economy.

The sharp reduction in the federal funds interest rate and the new fiscal stimulus package may, of course, be enough to avert a downturn. Many forecasters still predict that the economy will just slow in the first part of this year and then rebound after the summer. But the hope that monetary and fiscal policies would prevent continued weakness by boosting consumer confidence was derailed by the recent report that consumer confidence in January collapsed to the lowest level since 1992.

If a recession does occur, it could last longer and be more painful than the past several downturns because of differences in its origin and character. The recessions that began in 1991 and 2001 lasted only eight months from the start of the downturn until the beginning of the recovery. Even the deeper recession of 1981 lasted only 16 months.

But these past recessions were caused by deliberate Federal Reserve policy aimed at reversing a rise in inflation. In those cases, the Fed increased real interest rates until it saw the economic slowdown that it thought would move us back toward price stability. It then reversed course, reducing interest rates and bringing the recession to an end.

In contrast, the real interest rate in 2006 and 2007 stayed at a relatively low level of less than 3%. A key cause of the present slowdown and potential recession was not a tightening of monetary policy but the bursting of the house-price bubble after six years of exceptionally rapid house-price increases. The Fed therefore will not be able to end the recession as it did previous ones by turning off a tight monetary policy.

The unprecedented national fall in house prices is reducing household wealth and therefore consumer spending. House prices are down 10% from the 2006 high and are likely to fall at least another 10%. Each 10% decline cuts household wealth by about $2 trillion, and this eventually reduces annual consumer spending by about $100 billion. No one can predict the extent to which the coming fall in house prices will lead to defaults and foreclosures, driving house prices and wealth down even further. Falling house prices also discourage home building, with housing starts down 38% over the past 12 months.

But the principle cause for concern today is the paralysis of the credit markets. Credit is always key to the expansion of the economy. The collapse of confidence in credit markets is now preventing that necessary extension of credit. The decline of credit creation includes not only the banks but also the bond markets, hedge funds, insurance companies and mutual funds. Securitization, leveraged buyouts and credit insurance have also atrophied.

The dysfunctional character of the credit markets means that a Fed policy of reducing interest rates cannot be as effective in stimulating the economy as it has been in the past. Monetary policy may simply lack traction in the current credit environment.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 1 Comment

Corzine may cut 3,000 jobs

From the NY Times:

Corzine Is Said to Weigh Cutting 3,000 Jobs and One Department

Faced with a worsening economy, Gov. Jon S. Corzine is considering reducing the state’s work force by 3,000 employees and closing at least one department in the administration as part of his plan to slash up to $2.5 billion from next year’s budget, people who have been briefed on his plans said on Tuesday.

State Senator Barbara Buono, a Democrat from Middlesex County and the chairwoman of the budget committee, said that Mr. Corzine — who will unveil his budget for the new fiscal year next Tuesday — was weighing eliminating the Department of Personnel and pushing for an early retirement package — not layoffs — to save tens of millions of dollars.

“We need to end this longstanding bureaucratic inertia where departments and agencies refuse to face up to wasteful spending practices and a lack of oversight,” Ms. Buono said. “I think we really need to change the mindset of how government operates.”

Administration officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk about the plan, said that up to 3,000 workers could be affected, many of whom would presumably be older and have higher salaries. Some union leaders and lawmakers said, however, that they were wary of the governor’s plans.

“There will probably be reductions in staff,” Mr. Corzine said at a town hall meeting in Atlantic County two weeks ago.

When asked on Tuesday about the possibility of early retirement and the elimination of the Department of Personnel, Mr. Corzine’s press secretary, Lilo Stainton, said that while it was premature to discuss details of the budget, the governor “has made clear that it will include severe cuts, and all options are now being weighed.”

Posted in Politics, Property Taxes | 5 Comments

Short-term memories

From the Wall Street Journal:

When Nerves Get Short, Credit Gets Tight
By JON HILSENRATH
February 19, 2008; Page C1

One aspect of this credit crisis has a familiar ring to it. All around, investors and lenders are getting squeezed because they depended on short-term borrowing to finance long-term holdings. When their lenders get nervous, once-cheap short-term borrowing becomes dangerously expensive or disappears altogether.

Think about the Americans with sketchy credit backgrounds who depended on adjustable-rate mortgages to finance home purchases. Many thought they would refinance into fixed-rate mortgages if their adjustable rates reset much higher. Instead, their rates shot up and their banks wouldn’t refinance. For many it suddenly becomes impossible to finance the most essential of long-term investments — a home. Nearly 16% of risky, subprime mortgages with adjustable rates were at least 90 days delinquent as of Sept. 30, compared with 6% for subprime mortgages with fixed rates.

Wall Street is getting trapped by short-term borrowing in different ways. Two prime examples from last year were investments known as asset-backed commercial paper and structured investment vehicles. In both cases, banks and their clients went to the short-term commercial-paper markets to raise money. They used the money to acquire long-term investments, such as mortgage debt, or to make long-term loans. When commercial-paper markets seized up, the short-term borrowing rates soured and the strategy imploded.

An old-fashioned bank run works the same way. Depositors put their money in a bank, understanding they can pull it out at a moment’s notice. Banks use the money to make long-term loans to businesses or homeowners. When depositors get skittish and demand their money back, the bank has a problem: the funds are tied up for decades with customers. That is what happened to a British mortgage lender called Northern Rock last year. Now, the bank has been nationalized.

Something with similar contours is happening in the auction-rate-securities market. Municipalities, museums, student lenders and others issue these securities, which have interest rates that reset every week to 35 days. They use the money to finance projects or make student loans with long repayment periods. Investors have fled the market, and the municipalities that issue the notes have had to digest soaring interest costs.

There is nothing new about any of this. It was an ingredient in the financial crises that plagued emerging markets in the 1990s. Countries that depended on short-term debt got squeezed when investors became skittish about the miracle stories of emerging-market growth. The savings-and-loan crisis of the 1980s had its roots in a mismatch between the maturities of thrifts’ long-term assets and their short-term liabilities.

The trouble is even the most sophisticated bankers have very short-term memories. Because when the strategy doesn’t work, the consequences can be dire.

Posted in Economics, National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 255 Comments

Eliminating the property tax “rebate”

From Newsday:

Democratic lawmakers: End most property tax rebates

Three Democratic lawmakers on Monday proposed axing property tax rebates for most homeowners to help control state spending and avoid Gov. Jon S. Corzine’s proposed toll increases.

Sen. Jeff Van Drew and Assemblymen Nelson Albano and Matt Milam said rebates should continue only for senior citizens and disabled homeowners.

The rebates averaged $1,051 last year _ up about $700 from 2006 _ and are meant to help homeowners suffering from America’s highest property taxes, which are twice the national average at $6,330 per homeowner.

The expanded rebates were the centerpiece of Democratic efforts last year to ease the property tax burden. They were sent to households earning less than $250,000 per year. For most, the rebates equated to 20 percent of their property taxes.

The three Democrats, all from South Jersey’s 1st District, said their plan would save $1.3 billion. It comes with Corzine promising about $2.5 billion in budget cuts and proposing higher highway tolls as he looks to revamp troubled state finances.

The rebates cost the state about $2.3 billion last year, some of which was funded by the 1 percent sales tax increase from 2006. Still, voters in November rejected permanently dedicating half of that increase to property tax relief.

“The state is increasing taxes to provide relief,” Van Drew said. “It doesn’t make any sense. The people of this state spoke loud and clear this past November when they voted no on dedicating the remaining half cent to property tax relief.”

The three Democrats also want to ask voters this fall whether to permanently eliminate the rebates to save money.

“If we are wrong, let the voters tell us,” Albano said.

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Property Taxes | 6 Comments