No quick recovery for housing

From the AP:

Analysts: Housing pain to worsen

The current housing slump, which began in late 2005, probably has another year to go before things turn around. Before it is over, home prices — which soared during the boom years — will probably have fallen by the largest amount in any downturn in the post World War II period.

The problems in housing have been a serious drag on the overall economy — slashing more than a full percentage point off growth in some quarters. And those adverse effects will get worse in coming months, many private economists believe, reflecting the fallout from the severe credit crunch that hit in August.

The betting is that the overall economy will be able to avoid a recession, but that it will be a close call, with the point of maximum danger still ahead.

“I think the housing market has got another year of very weak sales, falling construction and lower home prices. And all of that assumes that the economy holds together reasonably well and we don’t have a recession,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com.

The biggest worry is that mortgage financing problems will grow even more severe, with soaring defaults dumping more homes onto an already glutted market, driving prices down further.

In a new report, the Joint Economic Committee estimates there will be 1.3 million foreclosures from mid-2007 through 2009 in subprime mortgages, loans provided to borrowers with weak credit histories.

Those foreclosures will wipe out an estimated $71 billion in housing wealth directly and an additional $32 billion indirectly by lowering the values of neighboring homes, according to the report by the JEC’s Democratic staff. The report predicts that will end up costing states $917 million in lost property tax revenue through the end of 2009. The states of California, New York, New Jersey and Florida are expected to be among the biggest losers.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 2 Comments

“[This] cycle has a very long time to run its course.”

From the Asbury Park Press:

Outlook bad, but not terrible

Expect at least another 18 months for the state’s economy to heal from the bursting of the subprime mortgage bubble. But demand for homes could start to creep up again in six months.

That’s the forecast of Joel Naroff, chief economist for Commerce Bancorp, who spoke to about 75 people at an Ocean County Business Association luncheon here Thursday.

“Really, it’s the issue driving a lot of the factors causing the economic problems in the country and local areas,” Naroff said.

Since mortgage lenders started overextending themselves by handing out loans to people who couldn’t afford to pay them off, the housing crisis has been working its way through a corrective cycle, Naroff said.

We’re in a sellers’ denial phase, in which homeowners are reluctant to sell based on a false hope that the price will go up, he said.

“We’re beginning to see a softening as prices come down,” he said. “But they’re not coming down nearly enough, because sellers can’t come to terms with dropping prices enough to clear the market.”

The median sale price for an existing single-family home in Monmouth, Ocean, Middlesex and Somerset counties was $385,100 in the second quarter of 2007, down 0.1 percent, or $200, from $385,300 in the same quarter last year, according to the National Association of Realtors.

Once prices become sufficiently low, the next phase kicks in: buyers’ denial, in which those looking to purchase wait on the hunch that the prices will continue to fall.

A glut of homes will be left on the market, a lot of supply with little demand. The next phase is working off the inventory brought on by foreclosures.

“What that tells you is this cycle has a very long time to run its course. How long depends on the specific market,” Naroff said. “But nationally, I’ll not be surprised to see problems into spring 2009.”

“I think 2008 should be a sluggish year, but not a terrible year,” Naroff said. “I see a cautiousness, not a recession.”

In the meantime, as banks and the government realize the error of their capricious lending behavior, New Jersey is experiencing a credit crunch.

“So when you came into a financial institution in June and they said, “OK, we’re willing to take a risk with you,’ now they won’t even look at you,” Naroff said.

Such a reversal to caution has stunted business growth. This is compounded in New Jersey by a series of financial hangups — particularly a state budget deficit competing with pressure to lower taxes — that won’t allow it to invest, as other states have, in an infrastructure that generates commercial prosperity, Naroff said.

Business owners at Thursday’s luncheon said they have witnessed this stagnancy.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 4 Comments

The “soft landing” is dead.

From the Wall Street Journal:

With Buyers Sidelined, Home Prices Slide
Tighter Credit, Anticipation of Further Declines Add To Worst Glut Since Late ’80s; the Foreclosure ‘Fear Factor’
By JAMES R. HAGERTY
October 25, 2007; Page D1

So many houses. So few buyers.

Home builders are slashing prices, often by more than 10%. Some people who list their homes on Craigslist.org admit they are “desperate” to sell. Inventories of unsold homes are at the highest level in nearly two decades, providing plenty of choices.

Yet a severe tightening of credit by mortgage lenders is keeping many buyers out of the market, while the huge supplies of homes for sale have persuaded others that they can wait for further price cuts.

The National Association of Realtors reported yesterday that sales of previously occupied homes in September dropped 19% from the same month a year ago to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.04 million units. The trade group blamed disruptions in the mortgage market.

Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal’s quarterly survey of housing-market conditions in 28 major U.S. metropolitan areas shows that inventories of unsold homes are still rising in most of them, prices are generally falling and overdue loan payments are piling up. (See chart)

Some forecasters now warn that home prices are unlikely to start rising in most of the country before 2009 or 2010. A year ago, many home builders and lenders still thought that the housing boom — which more than doubled prices in some areas during the first half of this decade — would end with a gentle landing. Now those hopes are dead.

“Everybody’s kind of at a stalemate now, waiting to see what happens next,” says Donna Butera, who has a business in Phoenix “staging” homes for sale, adding furniture and other decorative touches to make them more appealing. Ms. Butera and her husband, Mark, are trying to sell six homes in Phoenix and Scottsdale. They bought the properties as investments over the past few years, but now find that the rents they collect don’t cover mortgage payments that are resetting to higher levels after initial low-cost periods of a year or two.

Even so, home sales are likely to remain weak for months because lenders are still very cautious and huge supplies of homes are weighing on prices. On a national basis, the number of previously owned homes listed for sale is enough to last about 10.5 months at the current sales rate, the NAR said. The supply of detached single-family homes, at 10.2 months, is the highest since February 1988. Supplies hovered around four to five months for the first half of this decade. When the figure is longer than six months, it is considered a buyer’s market.

Inventory figures reported by Realtors probably understate supply because not all foreclosed homes are sold through real-estate agents, says Doug Duncan, chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association.

House prices, as measured by the S&P/Case-Shiller national index, are likely to fall about 7% this year and a similar amount in 2008, says Jan Hatzius, chief U.S. economist at Goldman Sachs in New York. He believes a further small decline is likely in 2009. Of course, house-price movements vary greatly around the country and even within metro areas; in some desirable locations with limited supply, prices are likely to keep rising.

Foreclosure headlines create a “fear factor” among buyers and prompt more to think they should wait before taking the plunge, says Jeffrey Otteau, president of Otteau Valuation Group, an East Brunswick, N.J., appraisal firm. He believes the typical home price in New Jersey will fall about 7% this year, after dropping 8% in 2006. He expects a further decline in 2008. But, he says, “when houses are priced right, they’re selling very quickly.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 252 Comments

More bad news…

From the NY Times:

Reports Suggest Broader Losses From Mortgages

Every time economists and Wall Street executives think they have acknowledged the full extent of the losses from the meltdown in real estate mortgages, more bad news turns up.

Merrill Lynch said yesterday that it would take a charge for mortgage-related securities on its books that is $3 billion more than the $5 billion it expected just two weeks ago. And a report from the National Association of Realtors showed that sales of existing homes in September fell twice as much as economists had expected, to their lowest level in nearly 10 years.

Stocks fell sharply early yesterday on the news, with the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index falling 1.8 percent before recovering in the afternoon. Investors also bid up Treasuries as they sought the safety of government-backed debt.

At this juncture, economists say the troubles in the mortgage market could, all told, cost financial firms and investors up to $400 billion.

That is far more than the roughly $240 billion cost, adjusted for inflation, of the savings and loan crisis of the early 1990s, according to estimates of the combined financial toll of that crisis on both the federal government and private sector. The loss in total real estate wealth is expected to range from $2 trillion to $4 trillion, depending on how far home prices fall, according to several economists.

That would be significantly less than the losses suffered by investors in the stock market collapse earlier this decade, which erased more than $7 trillion, or about 40 percent, of market value.

Experts caution that these estimates are preliminary and the total costs could get bigger still. They also note that the loss of real estate wealth could prove more damaging for the general public than falling stock values because more American families own homes than own stock.

In a new report to be issued today, the Joint Economic Committee of Congress predicts about two million foreclosures by the end of next year on homes purchased with subprime mortgages. That estimate is far higher than the Bush administration’s prediction in September of 500,000 foreclosures, which in itself would be a tidal wave compared with recent years. Congressional aides provided details of the report yesterday to The New York Times.

The Joint Economic Committee estimates that the lost of real estate wealth just from foreclosures on subprime loans will be about $71 billion. An additional $32 billion would be lost because foreclosed homes tend to drive down the prices of other houses in the neighborhood.

Those figures would cause a decline of $917 million in lost property tax revenue to state and local governments, which will also have to spend more on policing neighborhoods with vacant homes. The states most likely to be hard hit fall into two categories: those where prices had been rising fastest, like California and Florida, and Midwest states with weak economies, like Michigan and Ohio, where people with low or moderate incomes made heavy use of subprime loans to become homeowners and consolidate debts.

“State by state, the economic costs from the subprime debacle are shockingly high,” said Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York and the chairman of the Joint Economic Committee. “From New York to California, we are headed for billions in lost wealth, property values and tax revenues.”

The much bigger losses will be in declining real estate prices. Household real estate currently totals about $21 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve.

Global Insight, a research firm, predicts that the national average for housing prices will drop 5 percent over the next year and 10 percent before mid-2009, for a total of about $2 trillion. Economists at Goldman Sachs have predicted prices will drop by 15 percent, meaning an overall decline of more than $3 trillion; other forecasters have said the decline could be 20 percent or more.

House prices decline slowly, because many potential sellers simply stay in their current homes when they think prices are too low. But that becomes more difficult as people have to move either because of job changes or, increasingly, because their monthly payments are rising sharply. In the next 18 months, interest rates on more than two million homes loans will reset to higher adjustable rates.

The housing bust has also led to job losses. From the start of 2003 to March 2006, housing-related businesses like mortgage companies, home builders and contractors added 1.3 million jobs, or about 23 percent of all new jobs created in that period, according to an analysis by Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com.

Since then, the housing business has shed 383,000 jobs, while the rest of the economy has added nearly three million jobs.

Jan Hatzius, chief United States economist at Goldman Sachs, said the small decline in housing employment thus far is surprising and suggests more layoffs are ahead.

“You still have a million jobs that aren’t really needed anymore due to the downturn in housing,” he said.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | Comments Off on More bad news…

NJ to Businesses – Get Out

From the APP:

Unfriendly business climate hurts New Jersey, experts say

New Jersey needs a more business-friendly climate or it will continue to lose companies and skilled workers to lower-cost states, Gov. Corzine’s economic growth chief said Wednesday.

Gary Rose said improving the state’s poor reputation is like turning a steamship around, but it is the only way of increasing tax revenue without raising taxes.

“We’re clearly at the . . . point that, like it or not, we’ll make decisions over the next few years that will determine whether New Jersey is a tier-one state,” Rose said.

Rose spoke to about 150 people at a forum sponsored by New Jersey Leadership, a nonprofit organization that provides leadership training. Its theme: Can New Jersey win in the global economy?

The answer wasn’t clear. New Jersey touts a highly skilled work force and a prized location in the densely populated Northeast. But it remains a high-cost state in an economy that seems to reward locations with the lowest costs.

And experts said it has a long list of problems that are enough to drive growing businesses to other states or countries.

Rose said the state has begun to win over some companies — a notable change from previous years, when companies left New Jersey for more favorable business climates.

But experts said the success stories are overshadowed by New Jersey’s reputation, which, deserved or not, makes it difficult to compete in the global economy.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 2 Comments

September home sales “plunge” to 8 year low

From Bloomberg:

U.S. Existing Home Sales Fall More Than Forecast

Sales of previously owned U.S. homes fell more than forecast in September, signaling no letup in the real-estate slump that threatens to hobble economic growth.

Purchases declined 8 percent to an annual rate of 5.04 million, the fewest since record keeping began in 1999, from a 5.48 million August pace, the National Association of Realtors said in Washington. Sales were down 19 percent from September 2006 and the median home price dropped.

The collapse in subprime lending will limit access to credit and reduce sales even more in coming months, economists said. The drop in demand suggests home prices will keep falling, raising the risk consumer spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of the economy, will slow.

“Housing still has a lot of weakness ahead of it,” Jan Hatzius, chief U.S. economist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in New York, said before the report. “Existing home sales are still not particularly low by historic standards.”

Resales were forecast to fall 4.5 percent to an annual rate of 5.25 million from a previously reported 5.5 million pace in August, according to the median estimate of 76 economists in a Bloomberg News survey. Forecasts ranged from 4.95 million to 5.8 million.

The median price fell 4.2 percent to $211,700, compared with September 2006.

From MarketWatch:

U.S. home sales fall 8% to 8-year low in September

Sales of existing homes and condos fell 8% in September to the lowest level in at least eight years, further evidence that the credit squeeze in mortgage markets is hurting home sales, the National Association of Realtors reported Wednesday. Sales of existing homes and condos fell to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.04 million, the lowest since 1999, when the real estate group began tracking combined single-family and condo sales. Inventories of unsold homes and condos rose to a 10.5-month supply, the largest in at least eight years. For single-family homes alone, sales fell 8.6% in September to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.38 million, the lowest sales pace since January 1998.

From CNN/Money:

Home Sales Plunge by 8 Percent

— Sales of existing homes plunged by a record amount in September as turmoil in mortgage markets added more problems to a housing industry in its worst slump in 16 years.

The National Association of Realtors reported Wednesday that sales of existing homes fell 8 percent in September, the largest decline to show up in records dating to 1999. The seasonally adjusted annual sales rate of 5.04 million existing homes was also the slowest pace on record.

The weakness in sales translated into further pressure on prices. The median price — the point at which half the homes sold for more and half for less — fell to $211,700 in September, down by 4.2 percent from the sales price a year ago. It marked the 13th time out of the past 14 months that the year-over-year sales price has decreased.

The 8 percent decline in sales was bigger than the 4.5 percent decline that had been expected.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 178 Comments

NJ Housing Starts To Fall 21%

From the Record:

N.J. home building falls 21%

New Jersey builders have put on the brakes, cutting housing starts by 21 percent this year, the National Association of Home Builders said Tuesday.

The builders are responding to a drop in demand from buyers.

“The real estate market is in a severe and continuing contraction,” said Patrick O’Keefe, president of the New Jersey Builders Association.

The housing downturn follows a boom that saw New Jersey house prices rise by about 85 percent in the first half of this decade. That far outstripped the rise in household incomes, O’Keefe said, “leading to an affordability problem that inevitably led to a contraction.”

And mortgage lenders, who offered low interest rates and easy borrowing terms a couple of years ago, have tightened their standards, making it harder for first-timers to enter the market.

A decline in sales of existing homes has hurt home developers, because many of their would-be buyers can’t move till they unload their current homes. To attract buyers, builders are offering incentives and cutting prices.

“People still want to buy homes; all you have to do is hit the right price,” said Doug Fenichel, a spokesman for Red Bank-based Hovnanian Enterprises Inc., the state’s largest home builder.

According to the NAHB State Starts Forecast, about 24,800 housing units will be started this year in New Jersey — down significantly from the 31,400 housing starts of 2006 and the 35,000 of 2005. And builders are expected to keep production low in 2008, with about 24,200 housing starts.

O’Keefe said that estimate may be a bit high. He anticipates only about 22,000 housing starts in the state this year and 20,000 next year.

Posted in New Development, New Jersey Real Estate | 6 Comments

Yesterday Subprime, Today Option-ARM

From the Wall Street Journal:

Countrywide’s New Scare
‘Option ARM’ Delinquencies Bleed
Into Profitable Prime Mortgages
By RUTH SIMON and JAMES R. HAGERTY
October 24, 2007; Page C1

Subprime mortgages aren’t the only challenge facing Countrywide Financial Corp., the nation’s biggest home-mortgage lender. Some loans classified as prime when they were originated are now going bad at a rapid pace.

These loans are known as option adjustable-rate mortgages, or option ARMs. They typically have low introductory rates and allow minimal payments in the early years of the mortgage. Multiple payment choices include a minimum payment that covers none of the principal and only part of the interest normally due. If borrowers choose that minimum payment, their loan balances grow — a phenomenon known as “negative amortization.”

Countrywide first offered these loans in 2003 and quickly became a leader in this profitable and growing part of the mortgage market. Mortgage brokers liked the higher commissions and borrowers were drawn to low payments. As lending standards loosened, more of these loans included less-than-full documentation.

An analysis prepared for The Wall Street Journal by UBS AG shows that 3.55% of option ARMs originated by Countrywide in 2006 and packaged into securities sold to investors are at least 60 days past due. That compares with an average option-ARM delinquency rate of 2.56% for the industry as a whole and is the highest of six companies analyzed by UBS.

The increase in overdue payments partly reflects a decline in home prices in much of the U.S., which has made it more difficult for borrowers to refinance or sell their homes. In addition, at Countrywide, “they were giving these loans to riskier and riskier borrowers,” says UBS analyst Shumin Li.

Among option ARMs held in its own portfolio, 5.7% were at least 30 days past due as of June 30, the measure Countrywide uses. That’s up from 1.6% a year earlier. Countrywide held $27.8 billion of option ARMs as of June 30, accounting for about 41% of the loans held as investments by its savings bank. An additional $122 billion have been packaged into securities sold to investors, according to UBS.

The problems with option ARMs have been dwarfed by those in the subprime market, with 20% of nonprime loans serviced by Countrywide at least 30 days overdue as of June 30. Losses also are mounting on home-equity lines of credit and second-lien mortgages, of which Countrywide held $22.6 billion as of June 30.

The deteriorating performance of option ARMs is evidence that lax underwriting that led to problems in subprime loans is showing up in the prime market, where defaults typically are minimal. Challenges could grow, as from 2009 to 2011, monthly payments on some $229 billion of option ARMs will be adjusted to include market-rate interest and principal, according to Moody’s Economy.com.

In a recent interview, Countrywide Chairman and CEO Angelo Mozilo acknowledged that delinquent payments are “bleeding” into prime mortgages. He nevertheless reaffirmed his longstanding pledge that the company will survive the current mortgage turmoil and thrive, as many smaller lenders are forced out of business.

Mr. Mozilo told investors in September 2006 that he was “shocked” so many people were making the minimum payment. He called a sampling of borrowers to find out why. The “general answer…was that the value of my home is going up at a faster rate than the negative amortization,” he said. “I realized I was talking to a group…that had never seen in their adult life real-estate values go down.”

The temptation to use these loans was strong. A borrower with a $520,000 mortgage at a 30-year fixed rate of 6.05% would pay $3,134 monthly. With an option ARM carrying a 1% introductory rate, the minimum payment in the first year plummets to $1,673.

But after a specified period, often five years, when borrowers must start repaying principal and meeting full interest payments, monthly payments can more than double. If the balance outstanding gets too high — the ceiling generally is 110% to 125% of the original amount borrowed — borrowers can face sharply higher payments even sooner. Some borrowers could find themselves in the painful position of owing more than the value of their home.

Posted in National Real Estate, Risky Lending | Comments Off on Yesterday Subprime, Today Option-ARM

“With house prices falling, lenders are looking to control their risk.”

From the Wall Street Journal:

Lenders Curb New Mortgages In Weaker Areas
Move May Put Added Pressure On Prices in Hard-Hit States; Submarket Collateral Damage
By RUTH SIMON
October 23, 2007; Page D1

Some lenders are now making it tougher for borrowers in softening housing markets to get a mortgage.

The policy is designed to keep lenders from holding the bag if home prices in those markets continue to fall — and highly leveraged borrowers find themselves owing more than their home is worth. But the tighter standards, by discouraging home buyers, could add to downward pressure on home values in already weak markets.

Lenders such as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co. are cutting the maximum amount some borrowers can finance in counties or states where home prices are declining. Mortgage companies are also taking a tougher look at appraisals in housing markets with falling prices. Among the areas being hit by the tougher standards are parts of California, Florida and Michigan.

Lenders in the past have come under criticism for their failure to make loans in minority neighborhoods, a practice known as “redlining.” The latest round of tightening, by contrast, is broader, and aimed at markets where home prices are falling.

The sharper focus on soft housing markets comes after mortgage lenders have tightened their standards for all borrowers amid a slowing housing market, a widespread credit crunch and rising delinquencies. New national data from Equifax Inc. and Moody’s Economy.com show that the mortgage delinquency rate jumped to 3.3% in the third quarter from 2.3% a year earlier.

The impact of such restrictions could grow if these tighter standards become more widespread. It “could significantly impact the ability of even borrowers with good credit scores to buy a home if they don’t have a significant down payment,” says David Stevens, who runs the mortgage operation at Long & Foster Real Estate, based in Fairfax, Va. Last year, more than one-third of Long & Foster’s customers put less than 10% down, Mr. Stevens says.

With house prices falling, lenders are looking to control their risk, says Doug Duncan, chief economist of the Mortgage Bankers Association. But “there’s a little bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy,” he adds. “If you tighten standards, fewer people can qualify [for a mortgage]. Effective demand is going to be lower, resulting in lower house prices.”

Some of the lenders are reducing the maximum combined loan-to-value ratio, a measure of how much of a home’s value a borrower can finance using a mortgage and a home-equity loan. In August, J.P. Morgan Chase’s home-equity division cut the maximum amount borrowers in Nevada can finance to 85% of the home’s value. The unit won’t let borrowers finance more than 90% of their home’s value in seven other states — Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, New Jersey and New York. That compares to a maximum combined loan-to-value of 100% of a home’s value in Texas and Washington and 95% in other states. Chase made the move to reduce the chance that the loans it makes will wind up under water, a company spokesman says.

Wells Fargo, meanwhile, has expanded a program begun earlier this year that tightened standards in certain “declining” markets. Wells has reduced the maximum amount it will finance by 10 percentage points in markets the company has identified as “distressed.” The list includes more than 50 counties in seven states, including parts of California, Florida and Michigan. It also cut by five points maximum financing in more than 125 other counties in a total of 22 states and the District of Columbia. A spokesman says the company is monitoring credit conditions on a “day to day” basis.

In other cases, lenders are giving appraisals closer scrutiny. Bank of America Corp. says it is asking for more detailed appraisals in markets with falling prices. In many cases, appraisers are being told to drive by the property to get a better estimate of its value instead of just running information about the home through a computer model.

Posted in National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 144 Comments

What is predatory lending?

From NJ.com:

On predatory lending practices

While there is no precise definition of predatory lending, it’s fair to say that the expected result is some harm to the borrower, and as it applies to sub-prime mortgages, there is a greater chance that the borrower may lose their home due to the difficult terms of the mortgage.

Some of the more common abusive practices of predatory lending are:

Making loans based primarily on the collateral or liquidation value of the home upon foreclosure instead of the ability to repay the mortgage.

“Loan flipping,” causing the borrower to repeatedly refinance a loan in order to charge increasing fees.

Excessive prepayment penalties, which forces the sub-prime borrower to stay in the loan despite the fact that it’s in their best interest to refinance the loan as soon as their credit improves. The penalty period usually extends past the low, “teaser” rate and keeps them in the loan when the interest is reset at a much higher rate;

“Steering” the borrower to a sub-prime loan even when the borrower may have qualified for a mainstream loan. This is particularly disturbing since it has been estimated that about half of sub-prime borrowers could have qualified for better loan terms. Also, these loans can have mandatory arbitration, which states that borrowers aren’t allowed to seek legal remedies in court if they find that their homes are threatened by abusive or illegal terms, making it less likely that borrowers will receive a fair treatment.

The New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance regulates independent mortgage bankers and brokers.

Banks that accept deposits and make mortgage loans are regulated by some combination of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve and the Federal Department Insurance Corporation.

Nevertheless, the DOBI, along with other states, adopted the federal agencies’ statements on sub-prime lending made this past June. The DOBI acknowledges that sub-prime loans are not necessarily predatory, but they have taken steps to ensure that independent brokers do not make predatory loans.

New Jersey is one of 24 states that have anti-predatory lending laws and sub-prime mortgages have grown dramatically statewide. The DOBI is concerned about state residents and the possible difficulty with sub-prime mortgages, including sharply increased payments due to the resetting of their adjustable rate mortgages and possible foreclosures.

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Risky Lending | Comments Off on What is predatory lending?

Bankruptcy as an option

From the Wall Street Journal:

More Debtors Use Bankruptcy To Keep Homes
Chapter 13 Filings Gain In Popularity Because They Halt Foreclosures
By AMY MERRICK
October 23, 2007; Page A1

With loan defaults rising along with many mortgage payments, fast-growing numbers of homeowners are gambling on bankruptcy filings to try to stay in their homes.

Last month, as the nation’s housing slump continued, consumer bankruptcy filings increased almost 23% from a year earlier — representing nearly 69,000 people — according to the American Bankruptcy Institute, a nonprofit research group whose members include bankruptcy attorneys, judges and lenders. Overall, consumer bankruptcy filings were up 44.76% during the first nine months of this year.

In some areas where the real-estate boom was especially heated, the increase in filings has been even sharper — especially for a type of bankruptcy that allows homeowners to halt foreclosures on their homes.

The surge in filings hasn’t caught up with the flood of bankruptcy cases consumers launched in 2005, as they raced to beat a change in federal law that made it harder for individuals to declare bankruptcy. Even so, it shows the rising sense of insecurity many Americans feel as housing values fall, lending standards get tighter and hundreds of thousands of mortgages with low introductory interest rates “reset” to higher rates, boosting the homeowner’s monthly payments.

Most consumers filing for bankruptcy continue to do so under Chapter 7 of the federal Bankruptcy Code. Under that provision, a person must forfeit certain assets — including, in some cases, a portion of home equity. Those assets are sold to pay off debts.

While Chapter 7 filings stop foreclosure proceedings, the break is usually only temporary. As a practical matter, many homeowners who file under Chapter 7 lose their homes.

In recent months, however, an increasing number of homeowners have filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13, which staves off foreclosure proceedings while the homeowner works out a plan to pay off mortgage debt and other obligations over time — usually three to five years. To qualify, debtors must have a regular income and must stay current on their new bills. About four in 10 filers today are filing under Chapter 13 — up from three in 10 two years ago. The 2005 change in bankruptcy laws was designed in part to shift more filers to Chapter 13, which forgives less debt than Chapter 7.

“It’s a mess,” says William McLeod, a Boston bankruptcy attorney who says he is receiving twice as many calls from debtors as he did a year ago. “This is fed right now by real estate, and what’s been this mortgage frenzy in the last several years.”

Some bankruptcy attorneys are promoting Chapter 13 bankruptcy in press releases and commercials, and are contacting borrowers whose homes are already in the foreclosure process. But it isn’t a strategy that works for everyone. Consumer advocates say the homeowners who are most likely to benefit from Chapter 13 are those facing foreclosure because of a temporary financial setback, but who expect to be able to cover their mortgage payments in the future.

Of course, there are pitfalls. A Chapter 13 filing stays on a person’s credit file for a decade, wreaking havoc on his or her ability to get financing. And the repayment plans leave borrowers with little room for maneuver. Indeed, many Chapter 13 plans fail because of unforeseen problems such as an illness, job loss or expenses for an emergency home repair.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 2 Comments

“I’ve never seen the market as bad as this.”

From Bloomberg:

U.S. Housing Decline Threatens to Last Into 2009: John F. Wasik

Ivy Zelman’s view of the U.S. housing market is gloomy, but it’s probably the most realistic.

A veteran Wall Street analyst, Zelman, chief executive of the research firm Zelman & Associates, says it’s unlikely the U.S. housing market will recover before 2009, adding there’s a “50 to 60 percent chance of a recession,” as the housing slump curbs consumer spending.

Zelman paints a much darker picture than Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who said last week that housing will be a “significant drag” on the economy into next year.

When you consider the huge home inventories and tight-as-a- drum mortgage restrictions, it’s easy to conclude that the housing slump could extend well past 2008. Unless financing loosens up and buyers return, her prophecy will become a reality.

“I’ve never seen the market as bad as this,” Zelman said. “And it could get worse. The home-price decline could range from 16 percent to 22 percent.”

Monitoring inventory, builder incentives and demand, Zelman is also watching adjustable-rate mortgage resets. Homeowners with these loans will automatically face higher monthly payments that they may not be able to afford, another trigger for foreclosures or sales. Some $500 billion of these loans will re- adjust through 2008, Zelman says.

“These are the worst inventories we’ve seen as a nation,” she says. Zelman originally presented her report Oct. 10 to the Home Improvement Research Institute, a Tampa, Florida-based trade group.

Zelman’s words carry some weight because she was one of the few major Wall Street analysts to warn of a housing decline months before it began late last year.

She was alarmed that home prices far outpaced personal- income increases during the boom, which is how the economic disconnect began. A bubble created artificially high demand that had to deflate sometime. Now economists and analysts are trying to assess the collateral damage of the bust and subprime mortgage meltdown.

Meanwhile, builders are stuck with thousands of new homes they can’t sell and potential buyers are canceling in droves or are unable to get a mortgage. Housing starts fell to a 14-year low in September.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 140 Comments

Will housing kill the consumer?

From Bloomberg:

Stiglitz Says U.S. Housing Slump Will Stunt Consumer Spending

A slowdown in the U.S. economy may be prolonged as a house-price drop cuts off a source of funding for consumers, said Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel economics laureate.

“The average price of housing in the U.S. is already falling,” Stiglitz said in a speech in Tokyo today. “That will be a big problem for the U.S. and if it is a problem for the U.S., it’s going to be a big problem for the global economy.”

A U.S. real-estate recession sparked by defaults on home loans to borrowers with poor credit histories may worsen as stricter lending rules and higher mortgage rates make it more difficult for potential buyers to get financing. A drop in consumer spending in the world’s biggest economy may depress demand for exports in countries from China to Germany.

Stiglitz estimates that last year between $850 billion and $950 billion was taken out of the value of homes in mortgage- equity withdrawals, with a “significant fraction” translated into consumption and helping to offset the effect of higher oil prices.

“It is hard to see how this level of spending will be sustained as long as house prices decline and mortgage lending rates go up,” he said.

There is also a risk that the problems of the subprime market will spread, Stiglitz said, estimating that 1.7 Americans will lose their homes over the next year as charges rise on variable-rate loans.

“As all that housing is thrown into the market, it depresses prices and that means some mortgage holders will be under water — or the value of their homes will be less than their mortgages,” he said.

Housing prices in 20 U.S. metropolitan areas fell 3.9 percent in the 12 months through July, a report showed Sept. 25.

The International Monetary Fund cut its forecast for U.S. growth last week.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 6 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion

This is the time and place to post observations about your local areas, comments on news stories or the New Jersey housing market, open house reports, etc. If you have any questions you wanted to ask earlier in the week but never posted them up, let’s have them. Also a good place to post suggestions, requests for information, criticism, and praise.

For readers that have never commented, there is a link at the top of each message that is typically labelled “[#] Comments“. Go ahead and give that a click, you might be missing out on a world of information you didn’t know about. While you are there, introduce yourselves to everyone.

For new readers that have only read the messages displayed on the main page, take a look through the archives, a substantial amount of information has been put online in the past year. The archives can be accessed by using the links found in the menus on the right hand side of the page.

Posted in General | 365 Comments

Crystal Springs Comp Massacre

20 Country Lane, Hardyston NJ

MLS# 2021088
Purchased: 8/31/2005
Purchase Price: $635,000

MLS# 2368706
Sold: 10/19/2007
Sale Price: $620,000

Commission: 5%
Post Commission $589,000

Est. Loss: $46,000
Nominal Loss: ~7%
Real Loss: ~12%

18 Country Lane, Hardyston NJ

(Tax records)
Purchased: 8/22/2005
Purchase Price: $668,750

Currently for sale:
MLS# 2348864
List Date: 6/3/2006
Original List Price $689,000
Reduced: $675,000
DOM: 102
Expired

MLS# 2429976
List Date: 7/27/2007
Original List Price $659,000
Reduced: $624,000
DOM: 86
Active

Assuming sale at asking, post commission: $593,000
Est. Loss: $75,000
Nominal Loss: ~11%
Real Loss: ~16%

17 Country Lane, Hardyston NJ

MLS# 1681774
Purchased: 6/12/2004
Purchase Price: $810,000

Currently for sale:
MLS# 2401593
List Date: 5/1/2007
Original List Price $849,900
DOM: 173
Active

Assuming sale at asking, post commission: $807,000
Est. Loss: $3,000

1 Rock Oak, Hardyston NJ

(Tax Records)
Purchased: 6/28/2004
Purchase Price: $625,000

MLS# 2219541
List Date: 11/21/2005
Original List Price: $824,900
Reduced: $765,000
DOM: 181
Expired

MLS# 2281227
List Date: 5/22/2006
Original List Price $749,900
Reduced: $699,900
DOM: 123
Expired

MLS# 2323293
List Date: 9/23/2006
Original List Price: $679,900
Reduced: $549,000
DOM: 338
Under Contract

Assuming sale at asking, post commission: $521,000
Est. Loss: $104,000

20 Bracken Hill, Hardyston NJ

(Tax Records)
Purchased:4/8/2004
Purchase Price: $675,026

MLS# 2384179
List Date: 3/12/2007
Original List Price: $774,500
Reduced: $725,000
DOM: 184
Expired

MLS# 2445805
List Date: 9/19/2007
Original List Price: $599,900
DOM: 32
Active

Assuming sale at asking, post commission: $570,000
Est. Loss: $105,000

11 Havenhill, Hardyston NJ

(Tax Records)
Purchased:5/6/2005
Purchase Price: $440,000

MLS# 2318934
Original List Price: $494,900
Reduced $399,000
DOM: 404
Active

Assuming sale at asking, post commission: $375,000
Est. Loss: $65,000

Posted in Housing Bubble | 8 Comments