Ridgewood Comp Killer

Today’s Comp Killer* comes to us from Ridgewood, NJ.

This Bergen County home was purchased in November of 2004 for $650,000. It sold relatively quickly, at only 34 days on market.

MLS# 2023707 – 62# Spring Ave, Ridgewood NJ
List Date: 9/7/2004
Original List Price: $689,000
Sale Date: 11/08/2004
Sale Price $650,000
DOM: 34

It returned to market approximately 3 years after it was purchased. I don’t have any details on why it did, I don’t believe it is a pre-foreclosure or short-sale. It came to market priced aggressively, at $669k the sellers would already be facing a loss after the commission was paid. Unfortunately, the sellers didn’t get asking, and accepted an offer significantly under asking, but even more surprising, significantly under their original purchase price. After 3 years of ownership, these sellers are taking a loss of well over $50,000.

MLS# 2423749 – 62# Spring Ave, Ridgewood NJ
List Date: 7/7/2007
Original List Price $669,000
Sale Date: 10/19/2008
Sale Price: $625,000
DOM: 32

In Summary:

Purchased: 11/8/2004
Purchase Price: $650,000

Sold: 10/19/2007
Sale Price: $625,000

Commission: 5%
Post Commission: $594,000

Est. Dollar Loss: ~$56,000
Est. Nominal Loss: ~8.6%
Est. Real Loss: ~16%

* Note: Not all properties featured in Comp Killer would be used as comps in the case of a formal appraisal. Short-sales and foreclosures, because of their pressured nature, are not typically used as comp sales for an appraisal. In typical mark-to-make believe fashion, appraisers don’t consider ‘forced’ sales to be representative of the market.

Posted in Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 16 Comments

Welcome back 2003!

I came across this listing on the GSMLS hotsheet late yesterday evening. It comes to us from Washington Twp, Morris County NJ. It is a relatively young home, the prior owners purchased it new in September of 2003. Since this was a new home sale, the prior sales data wasn’t found in the MLS, however, the last sale price was easily found by using tax records. The prior owners purchased the house for $779,988 in 2003.

The home was listed for sale again, approximately 3 1/2 years after purchase, with an asking price of $939,000. That was recued to $879,900 over the next six months. The home was relisted, but this time with an asking price of $839,900, $100,000 less than the original asking price. Again, the price was too high, and the property saw price reductions down to $799,900. The home finally sold, with 46 days on the new listing, at $780,000, $12 more than what it sold for 4 years prior.

MLS# 2375357/2430903 – Northridge Court, Washington Twp
Original List Price: $939,900
Reduced to: $799,900
List Date: 2/14/2007
Days on Market: 213
Sold: 10/17/2007

Purchase Price: $779,988 (2003)
Sales Price: $780,000 (2007)
Commission: 5%
Post Commission: $741,000
Loss over 4 years of ownership: $40,000
Nominal loss over 4 years: ~5%
Real loss over 4 years: ~16%

Posted in Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 5 Comments

Beige Book – Second District

From the Federal Reserve:

The Beige Book – New York

The Second District’s economy has expanded at a moderate pace since the last report, while price pressures have remained steady. The labor market has generally been stable and tight. Manufacturers report ongoing expansion in activity in early October. Retailers indicate that sales were on or below plan in September, except in New York City, where sales have been relatively strong and tourism activity has held steady at high levels. Housing markets continue to be mixed: Manhattan’s sales and rental markets remained relatively firm in the third quarter, while housing markets in New Jersey and other areas continue to be soft. Office markets in the New York City area have been steady to stronger, with continued steep increases reported in Manhattan asking rents. Bankers report weakening loan demand, particularly for consumer loans and home mortgages; they also report tightened credit standards in all categories except consumer loans, and rising delinquency rates on commercial loans and mortgages.

Housing markets continue to be mixed, as in the last report. New Jersey homebuilders report that they have reduced new construction activity and have all but ceased seeking approvals for new development. Both builders and sellers of existing homes are reported to have become more negotiable on selling prices, and this has boosted sales activity somewhat. Selling prices for new homes in northern New Jersey are estimated to be down roughly 10 to 15 percent from a year earlier, on average. Based on monthly reports from New York State Realtors, sales of existing single-family homes were down 7 percent from a year earlier in August, while selling prices were down roughly 2 percent, on average–not much different than in prior months.

Manhattan’s apartment sales and rental markets were steady and relatively strong in the third quarter. Sales activity for co-ops and condos rebounded more than 60 percent from the depressed levels recorded a year earlier, and the number of listings (inventory) was down by roughly a third, to levels that are characterized as more normal. Overall, selling prices of Manhattan apartments were up slightly from a year earlier, on average, though the high end of the market registered double-digit price appreciation. Similarly, rents on high-end (large) apartments are reported to have risen by more than 15 percent from a year ago, reflecting a severe dearth of available units; rents on studio and one-bedroom units are estimated to be up roughly 7 percent, on average, over the past 12 months.

Based on our latest survey, conducted during the first few days of October, bankers report weakening demand for loans in all categories–particularly consumer loans and residential mortgages–as well as continued widespread decreases in refinancing activity. Respondents indicate tightening credit standards in all loan categories, except consumer loans.

(Emphasis added)

Posted in Economics | 1 Comment

NJ job market “encouraging”

From the Record:

State added 4,900 jobs last month

New Jersey added 4,900 jobs in September, prompting economists to express optimism about the health of the job market.

The state unemployment rate for September was 4.3 percent, the same as in August, according to monthly job figures released by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development. That was below the national rate of 4.7 percent.

The state has added 19,500 jobs since January. If that rate continues, the state will add 26,000 jobs this year — short of the 33,900 jobs added in 2006, and well short of the historical addition of 40,000 jobs a year.

Joseph Seneca, a Rutgers University economist, said the recent strength in the job market can be seen from the fact that the state added almost as many jobs in the third quarter — 9,500 — as in the first two quarters, when it added 10,000 jobs.

“This is encouraging,” he said.

Most of New Jersey’s growth, 4,600 jobs, came in the private sector, with the public sector adding 300 jobs.

The professional and business-services sector added the most jobs, 2,700, followed by 1,900 additional jobs in the education and health services sector, and 1,800 in the leisure and hospitality sector.

The largest decline came in the financial sector, which lost 1,500 jobs. Seneca said the loss “suggests the mortgage lending problems and the credit market problems are showing up now in job losses.”

The state also revised the August employment figures downward, reporting that the state lost 400 jobs instead of adding 500 as previously stated.

Jason Framm, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York, cautioned that the state has added jobs more slowly than the nation over the past year.

But he said the slight increase in New Jersey’s labor force participation rate is good news because it showed that more people are working and looking for work.

Posted in Economics | 3 Comments

How redevelopment shouldn’t be done.

From Bloomberg:

Meadowlands Garbage-to-Golf Plan May Hit New Jersey Trash Heap

New Jersey’s plan to transform polluted landfills into an upscale golf community may be headed for the trash heap.

When the developer, EnCap Golf Holdings LLC, broke ground in 2004, it called the project the “Miracle in the Meadowlands,” a region known for its sports arena and garbage dumps. The state’s plan was to have EnCap pay to clean up nearly 800 acres (320 hectares) and convert them into a recreation and residential area with a view of the Manhattan skyline.

EnCap got $358 million in state loans for the $1.2 billion project, and tax breaks, and still ran low on funding, according to state officials. It owes subcontractors millions of dollars, has been fined for environmental violations, and ceased cleanup work in February, the officials say. They’ve given EnCap until Nov. 20 to restart work, make an additional security deposit and win back withdrawn private financing commitments.

“The situation EnCap has created provides overwhelming evidence that EnCap does not possess the financial resources, administrative skills or technical expertise to complete the project,” Robert Ceberio, executive director of the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission, said in a Sept. 19 letter to EnCap. The commission oversees development in the region.

The Meadowlands plan called for EnCap to seal four landfills in Lyndhurst and Rutherford and build two golf courses, a hotel, offices, 2,000 housing units, shops and restaurants.

EnCap said it is determined to finish the project, though it wouldn’t rule out selling it to another developer.

EnCap is the second developer to have financing problems for a project in the 32-square-mile (83-square-kilometer) Meadowlands. Last year, Chevy Chase, Maryland-based Mills Corp. ran out of money to build Meadowlands Xanadu, a shopping and entertainment center with an indoor ski slope. Mills sold its stake to Los Angeles-based Colony Capital LLC, which plans to open the complex next year.

The EnCap project began in 2004 under then-Governor James McGreevey, who proclaimed it was “how redevelopment should be done.”

Posted in New Development, New Jersey Real Estate | Comments Off on How redevelopment shouldn’t be done.

Waldwick Comp Killer

Today’s Comp Killer* comes to us from prestigious Bergen County, courtesy of yesterday’s GSMLS hot-sheet. The property, located in Waldwick, was purchased in September of 2005 for $500,000. It came back to market in under two years, and was aggressively priced at $525,000. Over the next few months, it was reduced down to $490,000, $10,000 less than the purchase price. The property was sold, and closed, with a sale price of $480,000.

Factoring in the 5% commission as well as additional transaction costs on both the purchase and the sale, the seller has lost approximately $50,000 over the course of ownership.

MLS# 2105544 – 2# Waldwick Ave, Waldwick NJ
List Date: 9/6/2005
List Price: $535,000
Purchased: 12/21/2005
Purchase Price: $500,000

MLS# 2402778 – 2# Waldwick Ave, Waldwick NJ
List Date: 5/3/2007
List Price: $525,000
Reduced to $490,000
Sold: 10/16/2007
Sold Price: $480,000

Commission: 5%
Post Commission: $456,000

* Note: Not all properties featured in Comp Killer would be used as comps in the case of a formal appraisal. Short-sales and foreclosures, because of their pressured nature, are not typically used as comp sales for an appraisal. In typical mark-to-make believe fashion, appraisers don’t consider ‘forced’ sales to be representative of the market.

Posted in Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 224 Comments

“You can’t just try for a higher price because you really want it”

From the Record:

Sellers urged to set lower prices

Realtors often warn sellers about the danger of overpricing a house. Now they have evidence to show skeptical clients: research by Jeffrey Otteau, an East Brunswick appraiser.

He found that in a market where prices are declining, sellers who “test the market” with a high price usually end up with a lower price than those who price realistically.

“Houses that are priced right are selling,” said Otteau, who shared his results with real estate professionals this week at an East Hanover seminar. “Overpricing extends days on the market and guarantees that you will sell your home for less in a declining market.”

Otteau also said that by his measure, house prices in New Jersey will fall about 7 percent this year, after dropping 8 percent last year. He predicted prices will decline about 4 percent next year, and will not begin to rise again until 2011 — and in that year, will rise only 3 percent.

Otteau, of Otteau Valuation Group Inc., studied about 4,500 home sales that took place in the first half of 2007, largely in northern and central New Jersey. Most of the houses were priced between $500,000 and $750,000.

He looked at houses that sold in less than a month, and found that they had a median asking price of $599,900 and sold for almost full price — a median of $599,000. When he looked at houses that lingered on the market for more than a month, however, he found that they were priced higher — at a median of $634,900 — but actually sold for less, a median of $585,000. The median is the point at which half the sale prices are above and half below.

“Everything’s a function of price,” Otteau said.

With a high price, the house stays on the market as buyers ignore it in favor of lower-priced competitors. And in an environment of falling prices, a house that sells three months from now is going to command a lower price than one that sells today.

Otteau said that pricing a house a little below the competition not only catches buyers’ interest — it also reassures them that they won’t kick themselves later for overpaying if, as expected, home prices drift lower in 2008.

“You can’t just try for a higher price because you really want it,” he said. “The way to get a higher price is to create a sense of urgency by setting a lower price.”

Posted in Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 4 Comments

“We have not yet seen fully the impact of the credit shock…”

From Reuters:

2008 mortgage originations to hit 8-year low: MBA

Mortgage originations will fall next year to the lowest levels since 2000, forcing job losses for at least 30,000 more home finance professionals, according to a forecast released on Wednesday by the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Inventories of homes for sale will remain high as tighter lending standards across the industry reduce available credit for prospective home-buyers, said Doug Duncan, the MBA’s chief economist. Foreclosures as a result of increasing payments on adjustable-rate loans or poor underwriting will exacerbate the problem, he said.

“We have not yet seen fully the impact of the credit shock to the U.S. and world economies, and the severity of that impact will depend on how long it takes for the markets to return to normal functioning,” Duncan said at the annual meeting of the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Total mortgage originations will likely decline 18 percent to $1.89 trillion, the lowest volume of purchase and refinance loans since $1.14 trillion in 2000, according to the forecast. Loan volume will slide another 6 percent in 2009, it said.

Reduced volume means less business for mortgage bankers, who have already seen their ranks thinned by 60,000 to 70,000 people in the housing downturn, Duncan said.

It’s “tough times,” he said. “Continued consolidation is to be expected in the industry.”

Housing will be a drag on U.S. gross domestic product through the second quarter of 2008, Duncan said.

From the AP:

Mortgage Originations Expected to Plunge

The nation’s more than $2 trillion home mortgage business won’t halt its current slide anytime soon, with mortgage originations expected to fall 18 percent next year and decline another 6 percent in 2009, the Mortgage Bankers Association predicts.

And although a forecast to be released Wednesday at the organization’s annual convention offers no hope that a housing turnaround is near, the industry still foresees a future for the subprime market that helped trigger the broader downturn, the MBA’s chief economist said.

“It will come back,” Doug Duncan said in an interview in which he described a shift to far stricter lending standards for people with spotty credit.

The gloomy mortgage outlook is driven by the shrinking flow of cash to lenders from increasingly risk-averse investors, as well as slower overall economic growth.

“We have not yet seen fully the impact of the credit shock to the U.S. and world economies, and the severity of that impact will depend on how long it takes for the markets to return to normal functioning and where credit spreads ultimately settle,” Duncan told reporters in a preview of his Wednesday convention speech.

The MBA forecasts a 2 percent home price decline both this year and next year, with prices flattening out in 2009.

With the current glut of homes for sale, “any significant increase in homebuilding is probably years off,” Duncan said.

Duncan said the subprime niche won’t dry up entirely. But he said subprime borrowers will have to make sizable down payments before securing a mortgage loan and must offer documentation of their incomes, employment histories and credit standing.

“The day of the 100 percent loan-to-home value loan in the subprime world are gone,” he said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 1 Comment

“Every year you stay here, it gets a little tougher.”

From the APP:

State of mind: Half want out: Poll: Many New Jerseyans want to leave state, citing cost of living

Frederick J. Huffenus wants to leave his heart in New Jersey and move to South Carolina.

Huffenus, 63, a New Jersey native, is awaiting a heart transplant. When he gets it, the retired Toms River police officer and his wife plan to move south to save money in retirement.

“I love New Jersey,” Huffenus said. “New Jersey has everything I want. . . . But I want that (financial) peace of mind. You’re penalized for living here all your life, you work hard and save all your life, and then you’re taxed.”

Huffenus is among the half of state residents who would like to move out of state, a new Monmouth University/Gannett New Jersey newspapers poll shows.

The poll comes on the heels of a Rutgers University report last week that confirmed a sharp increase in the number of people leaving the state. That report said the state lost $680 million in tax revenue last year as a result.

Huffenus said his son Daniel moved to North Carolina in 1998. He has two other grown children living in New Jersey, and he hopes they move south eventually.

“Our concerns are more for our grandchildren, as they try to grow up in this state,” Huffenus said. “What kind of jobs would they have to have to afford a house?”

Huffenus said he and his wife believe they can get a larger three- or four-bedroom house with $800 in taxes. That compares with their small two-bedroom house in Toms River with $2,200 in taxes.

“I can go down there and live comfortably, have my grandchildren visit, and not have to worry about the money,” Huffenus said. “Every year you stay here, it gets a little tougher.”

In the Monmouth/Gannett poll, nearly 60 percent of those who said they wanted to leave New Jersey cited financial issues: property taxes, high cost-of-living, state taxes or housing costs.

More than half of adults under the age of 50 and nearly 60 percent of residents earning between $50,000 and $100,000 expressed a desire to leave New Jersey.

Of those who want to leave, a little more than half said they were “very likely” to make good on the wish, and more than half said they planned to go before retirement.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 12 Comments

“The state will be short more than $3 billion next year. Go cut your budgets.”

From the Philly Inquirer:

Corzine’s early shot may mean fiscal war

With Halloween just around the corner, the governor of New Jersey is sending a shiver through the state.
He may not have been dressed the part, but Gov. Corzine paid a grim-reaper-like visit to members of his cabinet two weeks ago with a foreboding message that went something like this:

The state will be short more than $3 billion next year. Go cut your budgets.

Corzine’s forecast – nearly $1 billion steeper than his treasury officials anticipated earlier this year – appears to be part of an emerging trend: New Jersey is one of at least seven states whose bean counters have begun to sense deficits for the coming year.

Rhode Island’s Republican governor yesterday announced more than 1,000 layoffs to close a projected $200 million gap.

But the ominous order from the usually tight-lipped Corzine is widely viewed as a political move as much as one potentially caused by a sluggish national economy.

Observers say Corzine’s message appears intended to prepare taxpayers and lawmakers for a fierce budget battle that will determine whether the onetime Wall Street heavyweight can, as promised, turn around his chronically troubled state.

“I think if the governor is serious – and I believe he is – this is his chance to make his mark,” said Philip Kirschner, president of the New Jersey Business and Industry Association and a longtime Trenton lobbyist.

“This is it,” Kirschner said. “This is his last shot.”

It is a battle that, by most accounts, will likely end with higher taxes, massive spending cuts, or a combination.

And, observers say, Corzine will use talk of deficits to try to win public acceptance of his controversial but still conceptual plan to lease toll roads. That idea could generate revenue – and higher tolls – as part of an asset-refinancing deal with investment banks like the one Corzine used to lead in New York.

Lawmakers from both parties say privately that Corzine appears to have floated the budget-shortfall news to pave the way for selling the toll-road plan, known in financial quarters as asset monetization.

“I don’t think the timing of the governor’s announcement of this is so much political as I think it is public awareness – for the public at large to be prepared for difficult political decisions,” said Assemblyman Louis Greenwald (D., Camden), who chairs the powerful Budget Committee.

He said Corzine’s message might also have been directed at new legislators who will be elected next month – “that once you’re elected, there are difficult decisions you have to make.”

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Property Taxes | 1 Comment

Rahway Comp Killer

Today’s Comp-killer comes to us from Rahway, NJ. It is a 2 bedroom, 2 full/2half bath end-unit townhome in a newer development (Riverwalk). It was purchased in July of 2006 for $450,000. The unit returned to market on 8/8/2007, at a list price of $439,000. While the fact that it returned to market at a price significantly below purchase price is interesting, the story gets more interesting when you look at the competition. A week prior, another unit in the same development was listed for sale. The unit, an interior unit, 2br, 2f/2h townhome was listed for sale on 8/1/2007 at a list price of $499,000. I’m sure when the owner of the interior-unit saw the end-unit listed at $60,000 less, they might have been upset, but there isn’t any way they could have prepared for what happened just yesterday.

MLS# 2433414 – 138# Essex Street, Rahway NJ
2 Bedrooms, 2.1 Baths
End-Unit Townhome
List Date: 8/8/2007
Original List Price: $439,000
Current Price: $379,000
DOM: 69
Purchased: 6/20/2006
Purchase Price: $450,000
Short Sale

The end-unit owner must be facing financial distress, as they’ve gotten the bank to agree to a short sale and have dropped the asking price to an incredible $379,000. The new asking price is more than $100,000 less than the competing property, just a few units away.

MLS# 2431727- 139# Essex Street, Rahway NJ
2 Bedrooms, 2.2 Baths
Interior-Unit Townhome
List Date: 8/1/2007
Original List Price: $499,000
Current Price: $499,000
DOM: 76
Purchased: 7/5/2006
Purchase Price: $434,900

A good example of the risk associated with purchasing a home in a condo or townhome development. When there are few differences between properties, they become very easy to compare, similar to commodities. Unfortunately, as a seller, it means that competition usually boils down to price, and price alone.

Posted in Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 213 Comments

“I would like to know what those damn things are worth”

From Bloomberg:

Bernanke Says Housing to Remain `Drag’ on U.S. Growth

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the housing slump will be a “significant drag” on U.S. growth into next year, though evidence of a broader impact on spending is limited.

“The Federal Reserve will continue to watch the situation closely and will act as needed to support efficient market functioning and to foster sustainable economic growth and price stability,” Bernanke said in a speech to the Economic Club of New York today.

Credit markets have improved, he added, while a full recovery will take time “and we may well see some setbacks.”

Bernanke’s speech, his first on the economy since August, comes as investors pared expectations for an interest-rate cut this month. Retail sales increased in September and jobs and wages picked up, suggesting consumers are weathering the worst housing slump since 1991 and reduced access to credit.

The Fed chief, as Vice Chairman Donald Kohn did two weeks ago, pointed out risks to both growth and inflation, declining to steer investors on whether he favors lower borrowing costs.

“He was not giving away anything about what the Fed was going to do at the next meeting,” said Robert Hormats, vice chairman of Goldman Sachs International, who attended the dinner.

“Risk management considerations also played a role in the decision, given the possibility that the housing correction and tighter credit could presage broader weakening in economic conditions that would be difficult to arrest,” he said.

In response to a question by Henry Kaufman, the former Salomon Brothers Inc. economist who now runs a New York firm bearing his name, Bernanke said investment firms “need to be as transparent as possible” about how they value their assets.

“This current financial stress is not likely to disappear overnight; partly it is an information problem,” Bernanke said. “It is going to take a while for investors to appropriately value these assets.”

“I would like to know what those damn things are worth,” Bernanke joked, referring to the products that investors have shunned in the credit rout. “This episode has revealed a weakness in structured credit products,” namely the difficulty in coming up with valuations in periods of stress.

Posted in Economics, National Real Estate | 1 Comment

Otteau Fall Workshop – Real Time Blogging

I’ll be blogging from the Otteau Valuation Group Fall Workshop this morning. We’ll try something new today, Real-Time Blogging. I’ve got broadband, and I’ve got a power plug, so I’ll be blogging throughout the presentation, which runs from 9:30 until noon.

8:50 – I arrived a few minutes ago and was one of the first participants through the doors. Brokers and agents are starting to stream through the door. No doubt the continental breakfast has enticed some to come early.

8:53 – Just got a cup of coffee, I only recognize one person so far.

9:00 – Few more agents coming through, surprisingly, I recognize a number of faces. Trying hard to remember where I know these folks from, but more importantly, if I’ve scoped out one of their open houses acting as a ‘buyer’.

9:03 – That first cup of coffee didn’t last nearly long enough. I’m heading back to the continental breakfast to mingle and ‘network’.

9:10 – About 40-50 people here at this point, we’re filling up quick. I took a quick look at the registration sheet and it looks like we’ll have at least 100 here today.

9:13 – Jeffrey Otteau just walked in to set up, I’m going to head over to chat.

9:21 – Heading back for more coffee. I promise this will get more interesting as the seminar starts.

9:26 – Up to about 80-90 at this point, we should be starting momentarily.

9:31 – And we’re off!

9:36 – I’ll be sharing what I can today. This material is, of course, copyright and all of the participants paid real money for the information. It wouldn’t be fair to Otteau and the others who paid for the information to reproduce it.

9:37 – Agenda is as follows: the “Field of Dreams”, the housing slump, right pricing, and of course, the market forecast.

9:38 – “While there are some bright spots, overall it’s a bit gloomy.” Jeff is promising to give an accurate and honest assessment of the market. He just told the group that the market will remain challenging long after the slump is over.

9:41 – For those who have been to an Otteau Workshop, you are familiar with Jeff’s “Right Pricing” concept. Just an anecdote, right priced homes sell in 16-30 days. The problem in the current market is that sellers are “trying to recapture yesterday’s price.”

9:43 – Jeff isn’t holding back, he’s turning these agents into ruthless price cutters.

9:44 – And I’m not kidding, he’s talking about 18 months of price declines.

9:46 – Jeff is taking the position that the housing boom will *not* repeat. Bringing in many of the topics that we’ve discussed on the blog before. Affordability, cost of doing business, business friendliness, decline in manufacturing, etc.

9:48 – The main driver behind the 1980-2005 boom, the “economic miracle”, was due the 80s shift from manufacturing to higher paying office jobs. Population of boomers moving into the home buying phase caused the frenzied market.

9:51 – Jeff is providing a very interesting commentary on the 80’s new-construction market. From sleeping bags to the Hovnanian lottery at the Meadowlands that drew 20,000 potential buyers.

9:52 – The 1990s were defined by technology, telecommunications and pharmaceuticals. As boomers transitioned from SFH to Condos, builders followed.

9:55 – For the agents that read this blog, if you haven’t attended the Fall Workshop yet, it’s worth every penny.

9:57 – Jeff is giving a very sobering talk. No pep talk, no cheerleading, and certainly no cherry on top. Very few smiles in the crowd.

10:03 – Excellent play-by-play of the drivers behind the bubble and the events that defined it.

10:11 – First time buyers were priced out around the third quarter of 2005. For every first time buyer that buys, four other sales take place simultaneously. Those who have been here before already know the 1:5 ‘rule of thumb’.

10:18 – Spring rally fizzles, inventory saturated.

10:21 – Big changes are due to “market localization” and a return to “primary vs secondary markets”, something not seen for more than 20 years. “Manhattan is king.” Great analysis of submarkets and the drivers behind the current hot markets. If you want more information you’ll need to pay Jeff for his work.

10:28 – Another interesting anecdote, urban markets, redevelopment, revitalization takes approximately 25 years before buyers will choose them as a housing option.

10:30 – Jeff just mentioned that we’re getting into the “dark and gloomy” part now. I thought we were there already. Handing out plenty of reasons why next year will be worse. Lots of grumbles in the audience. I think I might have ever heard a gasp.

10:35 – There is just way too much information for me to report on. Just to give you folks an idea, I’d guess that I’m posting less than a 1/10th of what is being discussed here. Jeff is running through this material like a freight train.

10:38 – Jeff is really hammering on the data. Population, jobs, migration, he hasn’t missed a beat.

10:41 – Moving on to subprime, mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures. Jeff isn’t happy about foreclosure reporting. We’ve touched on Jeff’s criticisms of the Realtytrac numbers before.

10:48 – Jeff is estimating approximately 10,000 REOs over the next 1.5-2 years. County by county projections were provided as well.

10:53 – Break, more coffee. I’m off to mingle.

11:03 – Restarting, heading into the second half. Focus is going to be on “Right Pricing” and CMA/Pricing techniques.

11:07 – Another interesting anecdote, 4 out of 10 condo/townhome purchases last year were single women, single paycheck households.

11:09 – Since most agents simply parrot Otteau, expect agents to downplay the foreclosure problem over the next year.

11:10 – “Overpricing virtually guarantees that the home will sell for less.”

11:13 – Working through some CMAs demonstrating that overpricing leads to lower overall prices.

11:15 – Jeff keeps on repeating the mantra, prices going down, prices going lower.

11:17 – “Sellers have unrealistic expectations.”

11:19 – More CMAs, covering the high-end markets.

11:22 – Summary of the CMAs, If it doesn’t sell in a few weeks, it’s overpriced. Period.

11:27 – MLS based CMAs are no longer accurate.

11:35 – Walking through some great examples of why median/average pricing isn’t accurate.

11:39 – My own comment, no way agents will talk sellers into “Right Pricing” their properties.

11:47 – Oof! Got a listing that doesn’t want to price properly? It’s worthless.

11:53 – Working through commercial, not of interest to most here so I’ll skip it.

11:57 – Housing slump to extend into 2008 or 2009.

11:58 – Bottom in pricing has not yet been reached.

12:00 – Won’t see price gains until 2011. Year by year forecast was provided.

12:04 – Surprisingly, the forecast mirrors many of the discussions we’ve had on the blog.

12:07 – Some very interesting information on “Green” homes and “Green lending”.

12:09 – We’re done, heading back to the real world.

Posted in National Real Estate, New Jersey Real Estate | 126 Comments

Killing the Realty Transfer Fee

From the Press of Atlantic City:

Realtors group beats drums against tax

This may be a difficult time to sell a house, but it’s a good time to try to kill a proposed local-purpose tax on house sales.
With prices and home equity falling, homeowners are more likely to notice and be concerned about some of their homes’ values going to government.

The New Jersey Association of Realtors is taking advantage of the cyclical nature of housing to mount a half-million-dollar campaign this fall against property sales taxes, formally known as realty transfer fees.

The state has charged such a fee since 1968, raising it in 2003 to become a significant source of revenue. A $250,000 house sale, for example, requires a $1,325 payment to the state.

The Realtors would like to pre-empt further increases in the tax, but what worries them more is a proposal in the Legislature to allow municipalities to collect such a tax, as well.

Jarrod Grasso, vice president of government affairs for the Realtors, said the lame-duck session following next month’s election is when such a tax measure might be considered.
Bills in the Assembly and state Senate would give municipalities the authority to institute by ordinance a realty transfer fee of as much as 50 cents per $500 of property value sold – a tax of 0.1 percent.

Grasso said this is a good time to call attention to the proposal.

“What we can use to our advantage is that home prices aren’t increasing at the rate they were in 2003, when (then) Gov. McGreevey proposed the realty transfer fee increase,” Grasso said last week. “His argument was, the philosophy was, home prices are increasing by leaps and bounds, so they’re going to make money on it when they sell.”

So much money that homeowners wouldn’t mind and maybe not even notice the increased state fee. Now, things are different.

“Somebody who bought a house last year might not have the equity built up to pay this transfer tax when they go to sell their home,” Grasso said.

For the Realtors, Grasso said a property-transfer tax isn’t a suitable source of municipal revenue because the amount collected would vary widely with the boom-and-bust cycle of the real estate industry.

“There would never be a guarantee that the money would be coming in,” he said. “The Legislature really needs to find other ways to help municipalities balance their budgets.”

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate | 16 Comments

Rescuing SIVs

From the Wall Street Journal

Rescue Readied By Banks Is Bet To Spur Market
By CARRICK MOLLENKAMP, DEBORAH SOLOMON and ROBIN SIDEL
October 15, 2007; Page A1

The high-stakes plan to rescue banks from losses on mortgage securities amounts to a big bet that a consortium of financial giants — at the prodding of the U.S. government — can persuade investors to pour more money into the troubled credit market.

Over the weekend, the Treasury hosted talks to help a group of banks set up a $100 billion fund to buy troubled assets in exchange for new short-term debt. The banks hope to have the fund up and running within 90 days.

According to people familiar with the matter, the Treasury hopes the plan, which could be announced as early as this morning, will jump-start demand for commercial paper, which froze up this summer amid the credit crunch that roiled global financial markets.

Companies depend on commercial paper to finance day-to-day expenses like payroll and rent. Some financial commercial paper — known as asset-backed paper — has been able to find buyers in recent weeks. But investors have remained skeptical of other types, including paper issued by certain bank-affiliated investment funds

The lack of buying signaled that the markets weren’t working properly, despite the efforts of central banks, and that investor confidence was low, since commercial paper typically is considered a safe investment.

Some influential investors think the Treasury-backed strategy might work. Other object to the Treasury’s role in seeking to help banks avoid a big financial hit for making bad bets.

The coordinated effort is a good way to help restart stalled debt markets, said Mohamed El-Erian, who runs Harvard University’s $35 billion endowment and is set to become co-chief executive and co-chief investment officer of money-management firm Pacific Investment Management Co. in January. “No bank would do this on its own.”

“The proposal has the potential to restore liquidity to a market,” he added.

Four weeks ago, in an unusual move, Treasury officials convened a meeting of some 10 banks, including Citigroup Inc., to discuss a private-sector solution to the problems and sounded out other market participants about their views on a rescue package. The problems stem from affiliated funds called structured investment vehicles, or SIVs, which Citigroup and others set up as a way to make money without taking the risk involved onto their balance sheets. Such vehicles are formally independent of the banks that create them. They issue their own short-term debt, usually at relatively low rates that reflects their high credit rating. Then, they use the proceeds to buy higher-yielding assets such as securities tied to mortgages or receivables from midsize businesses seeking to raise cash.

The government isn’t putting money into the plan but its role could be crucial in luring investors to buy debt issued by the rescue fund as part of the plan.

Behind Treasury’s concern were banks like Citigroup, whose affiliates owned $80 billion in assets backed by mortgages and other securities. The world’s biggest bank, by market value, held the assets off its balance sheet and was facing the prospect of either having to unload them in a disorderly fire-sale fashion or moving them onto its books.

Either scenario would have hurt financial markets and could have damped the economy by curtailing banks’ ability to make new loans to consumers and corporations. Treasury envisioned a potentially “disorderly” unwinding of assets that could worsen the credit crunch, said a person familiar with the matter.

Under the proposed rescue package Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. will set up a fund, or “superconduit,” to act as a buyer of last resort. It will pay market prices for SIV assets in an effort to prevent dumping.

J.P. Morgan and Bank of America don’t have SIVs, but they plan to participate because they would earn fees for helping arrange the superconduit, whose lifespan, according to people briefed on the plan, is expected to be about a year. The superconduit can buy assets from any bank or fund around the world.

Posted in National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 1 Comment