Weekend Open Discussion

This is the time and place to post observations about your local areas, comments on news stories or the New Jersey housing market, open house reports, etc. If you have any questions you wanted to ask earlier in the week but never posted them up, let’s have them. Also a good place to post suggestions, requests for information, criticism, and praise.

For readers that have never commented, there is a link at the top of each message that is typically labelled “[#] Comments“. Go ahead and give that a click, you might be missing out on a world of information you didn’t know about. While you are there, introduce yourselves to everyone.

For new readers that have only read the messages displayed on the main page, take a look through the archives, a substantial amount of information has been put online in the past year. The archives can be accessed by using the links found in the menus on the right hand side of the page.

Posted in General | 332 Comments

“Housing is bust, and wishful thinking cannot unbust it anytime soon”

From Bloomberg:

Franco Is Still Dead, and Housing Is Still Bust

The latest round of housing statistics — sales, starts, homebuilders’ outlook surveys and earnings reports — offered little hope that residential real estate would be back on its feet anytime soon.

“Housing is bust, and wishful thinking cannot unbust it anytime soon,” says Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, New York.

Just to recap what we learned this week: New home sales plunged 6.6 percent in June to 834,000, just above the seven- year low set in March. Sales are down 22 percent from a year earlier, even with builders throwing in the kitchen sink to sweeten incentives and lighten the load (inventories).

Home resales fell 3.9 percent last month to 5.75 million, a five-year low. They’re down 11 percent in the last 12 months.

The only surprise is that prices haven’t fallen more. The median price of an existing home was unchanged from a year earlier while new home prices fell 2.2 percent, removing the refinancing/cash-out option for strapped homeowners but not much of a real loss given soaring home prices from about 2001 through 2005.

Shepherdson warns against taking any comfort in the stabilization in home prices for two reasons: one, the deterioration in the supply picture; and two, the lack of adjustment in median prices for either seasonal variations or the mix of properties sold from one month to the next.

Because most of the problems have been in the subprime and Alt-A sectors, and because non-prime borrowers probably buy lower-priced homes, “their absence from the market will limit the speed of the decline in the median home price,” he says.

Haven’t we seen this movie before? Every bubble has a credit kicker when the price of whatever asset folks were chasing stops rising. Banks find religion when it comes to making new loans. Regulators step in to make sure there will be no repeat of the last bubble. Consumers save more; businesses invest less.

Housing has been the economy’s weakest link for some time, subtracting about 1 percentage point from growth in every quarter from the second quarter of 2006 through the first quarter of 2007.

Residential investment, as it’s referred to in the gross domestic product accounts, may not be the real threat to the U.S. economy. The danger lies in the fact that “there’s a lot more household debt associated with housing” than there was with the stock-market bubble, Carson says.

Maybe you can take housing out of the economy for analytical purposes (see “GDP ex-housing”). But when it comes to the real world, the two are inextricably linked.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 133 Comments

“It’s a double whammy for banks and brokers”

From the Wall Street Journal:

Wall Street’s Double Trouble
Faulty Mortgages, Debt-Risk Jitters Weigh on Banks
By APARAJITA SAHA-BUBNA
July 27, 2007; Page C5

Wall Street is dealing with the twin problems of faulty home loans and decreased demand for risky corporate debt.

In the credit-derivatives markets, the rising cost of credit protection for Bear Stearns Cos., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co., among others, coupled with declines in their respective stocks, reflect investors’ concerns that banks and brokers are at risk of potential big losses.

That’s because Wall Street could be left holding the bag on billions of dollars of debt-laden corporate deals at a time when bad bets on risky home loans are already putting a crimp on earnings and business in the banks’ mortgage units.

Investors in the credit-derivatives market currently see Bear — which has already told clients in two of its hedge funds that their investments are virtually worthless — and Lehman as banks worthy of a speculative, or junk, rating. Both banks are rated investment grade by major rating agencies.

“It’s a double whammy for banks and brokers,” said Sid Bakst, a senior portfolio manager at New York-based Robeco, Weiss, Peck & Greer Investments with $9 billion in fixed-income assets.

“The increasing risk of those two issues is resulting in a repricing across the whole capital structures of securities, with banks and brokers taking the brunt of it,” said Mr. Bakst. “The same concerns are being reflected in equity and debt prices.”

The cost of protecting a notional amount of $10 million of Bear bonds against a possible default for five years jumped to $105,000 a year yesterday, according to one market participant, citing credit default swaps levels. A day earlier, it was $83,500, according to CMA DataVision, a London-based credit-information specialist.

Lehman’s cost of credit protection for $10 million of bonds rose to $100,000 a year for five years from $81,500 Wednesday, while Goldman’s increased by $12,000 to $80,000. The cost of protection for Merrill bonds jumped to $80,000 a year from $69,000 a day earlier.

Sentiment was further damped by weak sales data on new and existing homes, and, dismal earnings from home builders who set off new alarm bells on the distressed U.S. housing market, with D.R. Horton Inc. and Beazer Homes USA Inc. posting losses while WCI Communities Inc. said it couldn’t find a buyer.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | Comments Off on “It’s a double whammy for banks and brokers”

Resetting loans offer no reprieve

From Reuters:

Mortgage delinquencies seen peaking in 2008

The credit quality of U.S. mortgages is set to weaken substantially through the remainder of 2007 and well into next year, with delinquencies peaking in mid-2008, Moody’s Economy.com said on Thursday.

Delinquencies will peak at 3.6 percent of all mortgage debt outstanding in the summer of 2008, up from 2.9 percent in this year’s first quarter, according to the study by the consulting firm based in West Chester, Pennsylvania.

“This will result in substantial financial damage,” Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Economy.com, said during a teleconference after the release of the study.

Subprime, “Alt-A”, jumbo interest-only and option adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMs, account for about 25 percent of all mortgage debt outstanding, or around $2.5 trillion. Of that amount, approximately $1.4 trillion is at serious risk of default, he said.

Of those mortgages, about $460 billion should actually end up defaulting some time this year or in 2008 and of that, $113 billion will be a loss to investors after recovery efforts are made, said Zandi.

That’s more pessimistic than Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who last week estimated losses between $50 and $100 billion.

The deterioration of mortgage credit quality can partly be blamed on falling U.S. house price prices, with all parts of the housing market experiencing declines. The high-end of the market, however, is holding up a bit better than the middle- and low-end, said Zandi.

The erosion of mortgage credit quality will also be due to the fact that many borrowers will soon be facing measurably higher mortgage payments. October will be the peak reset month when about $50 billion worth of mortgages will be adjusted to reflect higher interest rates, he said.

“As the resetting mounts, that will put significant financial pressure on many of the subprime borrowers and this pressure is already very intense,” he said.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 2 Comments

Housing recovery “won’t start before 2008 at the earliest”

From the Wall Street Journal:

The State of the Slump
Tighter Credit Helps Keep Housing Inventories Rising,
Though Some Hard-Hit Cities See Signs of a Turnaround
By JAMES R. HAGERTY and RUTH SIMON
July 26, 2007; Page D1

Tighter credit is prolonging a deep slump in home sales, but a quarterly Wall Street Journal survey of 28 major metro areas shows that the surge in inventories of unsold homes is slowing. In two of those markets — Boston and Denver — the number listed for sale has actually declined from a year ago.

The latest trends offer some hope for an eventual recovery in a U.S. housing market that generally has been cooling since mid-2005. Even so, many economists and industry executives say that recovery will be very gradual and won’t start before 2008 at the earliest. That’s partly because more-stringent lending policies are keeping many potential buyers on the sidelines, while others are holding off in hopes of prices heading even lower. Meanwhile, there is still a glut of homes on the market in much of the country, especially in Florida and parts of Arizona, Nevada and California.

Home sales and prices generally should bottom out around mid-2008, says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com, a research firm in West Chester, Pa. “The market will not revive quickly, however,” he says. “It won’t be until the turn of the decade before housing activity returns to more normal conditions.”

Median prices can be skewed by shifts in the market, however. Lenders are turning down more and more people with weak credit records or high debt in relation to income, and that is hurting sales of lower-end homes. Jeffrey Mezger, chief executive of KB Home, one of the nation’s largest mass-market builders, says its average home price has fallen about 12% from a year ago. In some markets, such as Southern California, he says, “there are two markets emerging.” While the high-end housing market has remained strong, prices are down in the entry-level and first-time move-up market.

As measured by the S&P/Case-Shiller national index, house prices in this year’s fourth quarter are likely to be down about 7% from a year earlier, says Thomas Lawler, a housing economist in Vienna, Va. He expects a further fall of about 3.5% in 2008.

But tight credit is squeezing lots of people still trying to buy a first home. William and Kimberly Glass were preapproved for a mortgage in May and found a $540,000, four-bedroom, three-bathroom home in Santa Clarita, Calif., near Los Angeles. But by the time they made the offer, lending standards had tightened to the point where they could no longer buy the home with no money down. “It’s a little frustrating that a month and a half ago we were in a better position than we are now,” says Mr. Glass, an actor. Putting “3% to 5% down would have basically drained our savings and put us in a precarious position with the renovations [the house] needed.”

“The noose is definitely tightening” around interest-only loans and option adjustable-rate mortgages, two products that were often used by cash-strapped borrowers to make their loan payments more affordable, says Brian Chappelle, a mortgage banking consultant in Washington. About one-third of borrowers who have used these loans in recent years wouldn’t qualify under the tighter standards, he says.

House prices are likely to remain weak in many areas until inventories of unsold homes fall. That process has begun in a few places, including the Boston metro area, where the number of homes listed for sale at the end of June was down 16% from a year earlier. Boston’s market cooled in early 2005, before most other areas, and so has had more time to adjust. Some frustrated sellers who don’t need to move have taken their homes off the market.

In the New Jersey suburbs near New York, listings surged in 2005 and 2006. At the end of June, though, listings in 12 northern New Jersey counties were up just 3% from a year ago, according to Otteau Valuation Group, an East Brunswick, N.J., appraisal firm. In Manhattan, inventories are down 17%, according to Corcoran Group, a real-estate brokerage. A torrent of Wall Street bonuses and foreign buyers lured by the weaker dollar have helped keep the market firm there, says Jonathan Miller, chief executive of Miller Samuel Inc., an appraisal firm in New York. The median sale price for co-ops and condos in Manhattan was $895,000 in the second quarter, up 1.7% from a year earlier, according to Miller Samuel.

Jeffrey G. Otteau, president of Otteau Valuation Group, says the parts of New Jersey popular with commuters into New York are doing best. In those areas, he says, sales are no longer slumping and the number of homes on the market has leveled off. “Proximity to Manhattan is once again becoming the primary force in the market,” he says.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 526 Comments

Buyers looking for stability

From the Record:

Housing news bleak

Demand for new housing is still declining and won’t start to rebound until 2008, the chief economist of the National Association of Home Builders said Wednesday.

“The big question is: Is this ball still rolling downhill? I think it is,” said the economist, David Seiders, in his midyear forecast for the home-construction industry. “We’re dealing with some major problems out there.”

Seiders, speaking from Washington, said the housing market began sliding in 2005, in reaction to the boom that dramatically inflated prices in the first half of this decade.

“That destroyed affordability,” he said.

And “unanticipated and sudden turmoil” in the sub-prime mortgage market this year has further weakened the outlook for the rest of this year and 2008, Seiders said. With overextended borrowers struggling to repay their mortgages, lenders have tightened their lending standards. As a result, fewer borrowers are able to get mortgages, dampening demand for houses.

Moreover, many would-be home buyers are reluctant to buy now because they believe prices have further to drop. Seiders predicted prices for existing single-family houses, as measured by the Standard & Poor’s Case-Shiller Index, will bottom out in the last quarter of this year, down about 8 percent to 10 percent from 2005’s peak.

In the Northeast, sales of existing homes were down 7.3 percent from a year ago. The NAR will release second-quarter sales figures for existing homes in New Jersey in mid-August.

“It appears that some buyers are looking for more signs of stability before they have enough confidence to make an offer,” said Lawrence Yun, senior economist for the Realtors.

Yun forecasts that sales of existing homes will fall by 5.6 percent this year, to 6.11 million, with prices dropping by 1.4 percent, to a median $218,800. That would be the first annual price decline on record.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | Comments Off on Buyers looking for stability

“They’re too big”

From the Herald News:

Clifton planners want to restrict huge homes

Some residents say large homes on small lots are eyesores that can ruin the character of a neighborhood.

In an effort to prevent more outsized homes from being built, the Planning Board is recommending that the City Council restrict home size by changing zoning laws. The board wants to reduce the maximum height and area of single-family homes and restrict the number of condominiums per acre.

It is beginning with the city’s master plan, a document that each of the state’s 566 municipalities must create and bring up-to-date every six years. The board plans to have a new one finalized next month.

The move comes as several North Jersey municipalities try to crack down on huge homes.

Currently in Clifton, single-family homes can cover between 25 and 30 percent of their lots — depending on the zoning category — while their height can reach 30 feet, and a developer can build up to 15 units per acre.

Under proposed revisions to the master plan, maximum lot coverage of single-family homes would be 22 to 27 percent, said Dennis Kirwan, the city planner. The highest point of a house would be used to calculate the height — which would remain at 30 feet — instead of using the midpoint between the bottom and top of the roof, as is now done. Developers would only be allowed to build eight units per acre, Kirwan said.

“I think that’s a great idea,” said resident Jeff Stephens, who lives in a cul-de-sac of what he describes as modest Cape Cod homes in the Athenia section.

But Patrick O’Keefe, spokesman for the New Jersey Builders Association, cautioned that limiting home size would force property values down.

“It would just cause the parcel to be less valuable,” he said.

Across North Jersey, municipalities have ramped up efforts over the past five years to restrict the size of residential homes, said Jill Hartmann, the city’s Mahwah-based planning consultant, who is helping to revise the city’s master plan.

The goal is to prevent the eyesore of huge homes built next to smaller ones, she said.

“You have a small house next to a large house – it puts everything out of proportion,” she said. With the rising cost of new homes, people are adding to existing homes rather than buying new ones, she added.

“It really coincides with the absolute blowout of the cost of housing in North Jersey,” Hartmann said.

During the meeting, officials cited the area west of Grove Street between Van Houten Avenue and Route 3, home to some of the city’s largest residential parcels, as particularly vulnerable, he said.

“A lot of potential large-scale growth is still able to take place within the city,” Kirwan said.

An alarm bell went off recently for Kirwan when a resident planning to sell a home said he’d based the property value on the potential for eight homes to be built on the lot, he said.

Posted in New Development, New Jersey Real Estate | 1 Comment

“[T]he housing market will not turn around any time soon”

From the Home News Tribune:

Home sales plunge in July

Sales of existing homes fell in July for a fourth consecutive month, further evidence that housing troubles are far from over.

The National Association of Realtors reported Wednesday that sales of existing homes dropped by 3.8 percent in June to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.75 million units. That is the slowest sales pace since November 2002 and the decline was about twice what had been expected.

The median price of an existing home edged up to $230,100, 0.3 percent more than a year ago. The median is the point where half the homes sold for more and half for less.

It was the first price gain in 11 months. Analysts, however, said they were looking for prices to fall further because of the high level of unsold homes.

For June, the median price of a single-family home rose by 0.1 percent, and the price of a condominium increased by 2.6 percent when compared with a year ago.

“With inventories still way out of line, unless prices fall a lot more, the housing market will not turn around any time soon,” said Joel Naroff, chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors.

The declines in existing home sales in June covered all parts of the country. Sales fell by 7.3 percent in the Northeast, 6.8 percent in the West, 2.8 percent in the Midwest and 1.7 percent in the South.

The supply of unsold homes did drop by 4.2 percent in June, to 4.2 million units. That level, however, still was seen as a drag on the market Some analysts said part of the decline occurred because disappointed owners pulled their homes off the market or decided to rent rather than sell.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | Comments Off on “[T]he housing market will not turn around any time soon”

Housing recovery postponed until 2009

From the New York Times:

Top Lender Sees Mortgage Woes for ‘Good’ Risks

Countrywide Financial, the nation’s largest mortgage lender, said yesterday that more borrowers with good credit were falling behind on their loans and that the housing market might not begin recovering until 2009 because of a decline in house prices that goes beyond anything experienced in decades.

The news from Countrywide, widely seen as a bellwether for the mortgage market, initiated a sell-off in the stock market, which is at its most volatile in more than a year. The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index fell 30.53 points, or 2 percent, to 1,511.04, its biggest one-day drop in nearly five months. The dollar dropped to a new low against the euro, edging closer to $1.40 to 1 euro. Stocks opened sharply lower in Japan this morning.

The slumping housing market has become the biggest worry for the stock market, which just four days ago set records, because of its potential impact on the broader economy and financial system.

Countrywide’s stark assessment signaled a critical change in the substance and tenor of how housing executives are publicly describing the market. Just a couple of months ago, some executives were predicting a relatively quick recovery and saying that most home loans would be fine with the exception of those made to borrowers with weak credit who stretched too far financially.

Executives at Countrywide had for some time been more skeptical than others but the bluntness of their comments yesterday surprised many on Wall Street. In a conference call with analysts that lasted three hours, Countrywide’s chairman and chief executive, Angelo R. Mozilo, said home prices were falling “almost like never before, with the exception of the Great Depression.”

Nationally, home prices have not fallen in the 35 years or so that the government and private services have tracked them. Some researchers like Robert J. Shiller of Yale have compiled data that goes as far back as 1890 and shows that home prices fell for several years during the 1930s.

Mr. Mozilo said that because of a large number of homes on the market, the housing sector would continue to suffer until sometime in 2008 and not begin recovering until 2009.

“Where you will see prime borrowers have trouble is where they took the riskiest of adjustable-rate mortgages and put nothing down with a first and second combined,” Thomas Lawler, a housing economist, said.

Many of Countrywide’s home equity loans were second mortgages made to people who were financing the full or nearly full cost of their homes. These loans are particularly risky because when house prices are falling and a home is foreclosed and resold, the holder of the first lien is paid off and often there is little left to apply to the second mortgage.

“Countrywide is highlighting what is an industrywide problem,” said Christopher C. Brendler, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus, an investment firm in St. Louis. A second mortgage “is really an unsecured loan like a credit card.”

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 264 Comments

NJ retiree obligations skyrocket to $58b

From the NY Times:

$58 Billion Shortfall for New Jersey Retiree Care

In 1994, New Jersey decided to stop setting aside money in a fund to pay for health care for its retired public workers. The savings paved the way for a big tax cut.

Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of public workers were being told that as long as they worked 25 years, the system would provide virtually free health care for them when they retired, often when they were as young as 55.

No one added up the cost — until now.

It turns out that New Jersey will need about $58 billion, in today’s dollars, to provide all the care it has promised its current and future retirees. That’s nearly twice the state budget and nearly twice the amount of its outstanding debt. And because of the step it took in 1994, the state has virtually no money in reserve to cover those costs.

In addition, New Jersey’s towns and other local governments owe about $10 billion for health care for their own retirees.

Many other states have been promising retiree health care without keeping track of the cost. They, too, are tallying what they owe, to comply with a new accounting rule that applies to all state and local governments. The numbers tend to be big, but so far, New Jersey’s obligation, which the state planned to announce tomorrow, appears to be the biggest.

“This is a very pressing situation that can’t go on much longer without being repaired,” said Clifford A. Goldman, New Jersey’s treasurer from 1976 to 1982.

New Jersey officials say the state simply cannot afford to create a reserve at this time, given its debt. Instead, they plan to pay each year’s retiree benefits out of revenues and work to control future costs.

The portion of the $58 billion that they need to come up with each year will rise sharply because of soaring health costs and a burgeoning population of retirees, according to the New Jersey Treasury. The state will spend about $1.1 billion on this year’s care, and the figure is expected to double in five years.

Meanwhile, the state’s revenues are largely static. That means that unless something changes, New Jersey will have less money each year to pay for vital services like colleges, hospitals and mass transit. Its popular program to preserve green space just fell victim to the need to devote huge amounts to the retirement plans and debt servicing.

Word of the amount owed for retiree health care over the long term comes on the heels of revelations that the state’s pension fund is woefully short and needs contributions of about $2.2 billion a year to bring it back into balance.

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Property Taxes | 5 Comments

Overwhelming support, but only in the face of higher taxes

From the Courier Post:

N.J. would rather sell roads than hike taxes

New Jersey residents overwhelmingly oppose the leasing of state assets, such as the lottery or the New Jersey Turnpike, to fix the state’s fiscal problems.

That is, unless the alternative is a tax hike. Then they overwhelmingly support the leasing of assets, a Monmouth University/Gannett New Jersey poll shows.

Nonetheless, residents are skeptical the money will be put to good use and fearful that if highways are leased, tolls will increase, said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.

“As a general concept, asset monetization, to use the governor’s parlance, just doesn’t sit well with New Jerseyans,” Murray said.

“While most New Jersey residents would choose leasing state assets over raising taxes, the residents don’t believe it’s a choice between the two,” he added. “Residents see this as just a one-shot that won’t change the way New Jersey does business. They see it as a pot of money that will disappear.”

“It shows the public believes it cannot tax itself out of long-festering problems and is receptive to alternatives,” spokesman Tom Vincz said. “We look forward to engaging the public on a plan that conforms with the governor’s principles and that directly answers the public’s concerns as expressed in the poll.”

The Monmouth University/Gannett poll showed that 55 percent of residents opposed the idea Corzine has dubbed “asset monetization” without explaining the details. Nearly 60 percent opposed the leasing of the turnpike or Garden State Parkway, and about the same number opposed allowing private developers to build on top of train stations. Leasing the state lottery or selling naming rights to state parks were also opposed by more than half those polled.

Respondents to the poll were asked to choose between leasing assets or raising taxes: 62 percent would rather lease the assets. Yet when asked whether the state should lease assets or make significant budget cuts, residents were split — about 4 in 10 favored both.

If the leasing is completed, 53 percent said they wanted the money sent to them as property tax relief, even though the state’s pension funding and budget crises have forced the asset monetization proposal.

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Property Taxes | 4 Comments

“The crisis”

From Reuters:

Enough subprime, let’s talk housing debacle:James Saft

Troubles are surfacing with loans made to better-off U.S. homebuyers in a worrying trend that indicates what’s been termed “The subprime crisis” may need to be rebadged “The housing crisis” and eventually maybe just “The crisis.”

While signs are tentative so far, credit rating downgrades and payment delinquencies are happening more frequently in what is called the “Alt-A” mortgage loan market, the slice just above subprime in creditworthiness.

The upshot is more pain for investors in mortgages, less appetite for other risky credits, such as leveraged buyouts, falling U.S. house prices, and the big one, a threat to consumption in the United States.

In the past week, both Moody’s and S&P have announced downgrades and reviews for downgrades for securities backed by Alternative-A loans, which are typically made to borrowers with less proof of their finances than prime borrowers or who have small credit problems in their past.

Delinquencies on Alt-A have been rising faster than for subprime, though at much lower levels. Between January and March, delinquencies for Alt-A rose by 17 percent, to 3.05 percent of loans, while subprime deliquencies rose by about 3.5 percent, to 14.83 percent, according to First American LoanPerformance data.

Fitch Ratings, too, has said it is “very concerned” about Alt-A loans, especially those with low early repayments which aren’t even sufficient to pay all of the interest.

The idea that problems in subprime were contained and would not spread to the general economy has been maintained by U.S. central bankers and policy makers. It has also been the market’s central assumption and underpinned the dizzying rise of stocks to new highs.

If Alt-A follows the path of subprime, there will be more forced sellers of U.S. houses, less available finance to buy that increased supply and an ever-growing number of homeowners who will realise, even if they are “prime” borrowers, that their largest single asset is worth less than they thought.

The U.S. economy has been the beneficiary of a self-reinforcing cycle in recent years, as easy credit and rising house prices combined to fuel economic and consumer confidence, making lenders and borrowers alike think the tide would continue to rise and float everyone over the risks they had taken on.

But signs of weakness in U.S. housing are weakening that trust, according to Robert Shiller, an economics professor at Yale, whose S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price index is showing a yearly loss of 2.1 percent.

“This is likely to eventually have a greater impact on the economy than we now see in subprime and Alt-A, for it can have an effect on general economic confidence,” said Shiller.

Subprime may have been the first area to roll over, but pain has, is and will continue to spread to the Alt-A and Prime sectors of the U.S. housing market,” RBS credit strategist Bob Janjuah said in a research note on Monday.

And while Alt-A losses are still modest in percentage terms, the overall numbers are huge, with estimates of Alt-A lending at $386 billion in 2006, as against $640 billion in subprime.

If, or perhaps when, this all translates into a retrenchment by the U.S. consumer, the damage could be very large.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 375 Comments

NJ DOBI issues statement on Subprime

From the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance:

BULLETIN NO. 07-15 – STATEMENT ON SUBPRIME MORTGAGE LENDING

On July 17, 2007 the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS), the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators (AARMR), and the National Association of Consumer Credit Administrators (NACCA) issued their Statement on Subprime Lending. In substance, this statement parallels the Statement issued on June 29, 2007 by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) but it applies to entities not under the supervisory authority of the Federal agencies.

The New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance endorses the July 17, 2007 Statement on Subprime Lending and now issues its own Statement, which is attached hereto and is also posted on the Department’s website at www.njdobi.org. All New Jersey licensed mortgage bankers, correspondent mortgage bankers, mortgage brokers, secondary lenders, their officers, directors and employees, and their registered mortgage solicitors are strongly
encouraged to review this Statement.

The Statement expresses concerns about adjustable rate mortgages with low initial payments followed by a rate reset that can result in payment shock, particularly when the borrower originally qualified for the loan based only on the low introductory payment rate. The Statement addresses additional concerns relating to prepayment penalties, the absence of escrow accounts that provide for insurance and tax payments, and the need to improve borrowers’ understanding of these products through enhanced disclosures.

The full statement can be found here:

STATEMENT ON SUBPRIME MORTGAGE LENDING

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Risky Lending | 10 Comments

“Why does it cost $6,000 more per year to educate my child?”

From the Record:

Hearing on River Dell breakup draws 500

An overflow crowd of 500 residents attended a public hearing Monday night on a proposal to dissolve the River Dell Regional School District, a sign that the issue has struck a nerve with residents of both Oradell and River Edge.

River Edge residents — who appeared to represent the majority of the group — wore yellow ribbons and buttons in a show of solidarity and argued that the plan proposed by Oradell would adversely affect the education of students in both boroughs.

But Oradell residents, tired of paying what they see as an unfair tax burden, responded that the only change would be to divide the taxes more equitably.

“The system is broken, and it needs fixing,” said Oradell Mayor Frederick LaMonica. “But there is no fix on the horizon. That is why we are taking this action, which is the only one available to us.”

The hearing was held by a special state review board, which is charged with deciding whether to allow the proposal to go to a referendum.

At issue is the current tax system, which allocates school taxes based on each borough’s total property value, rather than the number of students each sends to the regional district.

Oradell pays more than $2 million more in taxes each year despite sending many fewer students. The result is that each student from Oradell costs taxpayers approximately $6,000 more in school taxes to educate.

“Why does it cost $6,000 more per year to educate my child?” said Oradell resident Michael Chakansky.

Oradell’s plan would extend each borough’s district from kindergarten to 12th grade, rather than sixth grade. River Edge would control the middle school, while Oradell would operate the high school.

Each borough would pay the taxes to the other based on the number of students it sent to the other’s school, potentially saving Oradell millions of dollars while significantly increasing River Edge’s taxes.

Posted in Politics, Property Taxes | 3 Comments

“Trenton Makes, the World Takes”

From the APP:

Corzine’s global warming initiatives just smoke and mirrors

With Al Gore watching, Gov. Corzine signed the Global Warming Response Act into law earlier this month. That makes New Jersey the third state, following California and Hawaii, to enact such a law. Eight more are considering similar measures, but none is as aggressive as New Jersey’s.

The legislation requires the state to reduce so-called greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, and to 80 percent below 2006 levels by 2050. No other state has set goals so far into the future, and no other state has required energy imports to adhere to these standards as well.

The bill drew broad bipartisan support. Republican state Sen. Tom Kean Jr., for instance, said enthusiastically, “having seen the direction that the Congressional Democrats intend to take on this crucial issue, I could not agree more strongly with those sentiments.”

There are clearly feel-good political points to be gained on the global warming issue, but what effect can the New Jersey state government actually have on global climate change? Consider the ambitious Kyoto Protocol, which seeks significant worldwide cuts in emissions. The National Center for Atmospheric Research estimates of lower global temperatures with full implementation of Kyoto are so negligible it would never justify the economic costs.

If the United States cannot make a material impact on climate change, it’s the height of folly to think a single state, New Jersey, can. Even if all industry ceased to exist in New Jersey, and the state never emitted another molecule of carbon dioxide, the effect on global climate would be meaningless.

This is all about symbolism, of course, and Corzine and Gore hope to set an example for other states and countries, they say. Unfortunately, that symbolism will cost many New Jersey workers and entrepreneurs their livelihood. New Jersey has lost 8,000 private sector jobs in seven years, and this “politically correct” feel-good nonsense will accelerate that sorry trend.

New Jersey is a major petroleum refining state and is one of the primary suppliers of petroleum products to the Northeast. It’s also one reason why gasoline prices are low in our state. This law will cripple that industry, costing the state one of its few remaining engines of growth, and it will serve as a hidden gasoline tax on every motorist in New Jersey.

The law broadly provides for state supervision and regulation of emissions, but it contains no specific proposals to lower emissions. That makes it difficult to determine exactly how much implementation will cost, which means the Legislature and governor enacted the law without even the possibility of a cost-benefit analysis. Assemblyman Joseph Pennacchio, R-Morris, noted the discussion of the ends but not the means was reminiscent of the Highlands Act, which took away local zoning powers and gave them to the state.

With one of the highest state and local tax burdens in the country and the third worst business climate, according to the Tax Foundation, New Jersey’s future looks more bleak every day. New Jersey was once an engine of prosperity and the envy of the nation.

The state capital’s famous motto: “Trenton Makes, the World Takes,” is a painful reminder our once powerful industrial economy is being strangled out of existence by taxes and regulation. Businesses don’t have to locate in New Jersey — they can easily move to Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Florida or China.

It’s a huge mistake to impose enormous economic costs on the state for feel-good symbolism that will have a negligible impact on global climate. The New Jersey economy is already in a hole. It’s time to stop digging and focus on cutting taxes and bringing jobs back to our state, not posing for photos with celebrities. Unfortunately, Corzine and his legislative allies are more in tune with their Hollywood idols than with New Jersey’s overtaxed working families.

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 7 Comments