3,404 Luxury Condos Proposed for Rutherford

More on the Highland Cross project in Rutherford, NJ.

From NorthJersey.com/Record:

Builders try to sell town on proposal for condos

Developers are projecting that new students would overflow the school district’s facilities with or without their controversial proposal to build what some regard as an “entire new city” on a vacant industrial site along Route 17.

But during a public meeting Monday, residents questioned the projected increases in student populations and continued to rally against the development of high-end condominiums, retail stores and hotels.

More than 200 people packed Borough Hall to attend the third public presentation by developers Lincoln Equities Group LLC and Tarragon Corp., which seek to build 3,404 luxury condos on a 52-acre parcel known as the Highland Cross Redevelopment Area.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to 3,404 Luxury Condos Proposed for Rutherford

  1. Anonymous says:

    Oh yeah, another condo offer with a free Plasma TV

    http://philadelphia.craigslist.org/rfs/150726495.html

  2. Anonymous says:

    Oh wait, even the victory condos in downtown philly are offering the same. Thats the first sign that things are not going as planned

    http://philadelphia.craigslist.org/rfs/150560957.html

  3. bairen says:

    Instead of a plasma TV they should give you something more practical. How about your choice of two of the following; a psychiatrist, marriage counsellor, divorce or bankrupcy attorney as you go upside down for the next 10 years of your life.

  4. pesche22 says:

    grim,,,

    its offical.. the banks are running
    Mills Corp.

    wait till we see what happens with
    the meadowlands project.

    this will not be good for the nj
    taxpayer. this is another blunder
    by our pols.

    this is going to be a diaster

  5. bairen says:

    Just think of the extra traffic. Will a light rail be built to connect this “new city” to NJ Transit at tax payers cost?

    Any increase to Rutherford’s property tax rolls will be more then eaten up by the infrastructure and service increases this McCity will need. Maybe Rutherford could spin this development off to be its own municpality. We all know Jersey doesn’t have enough municipalites.

  6. Is this proposed development at the old Curtiss-Wright factory?

    (Somehow I think the C/W factory was further west, maybe in Wood-Ridge Has-Heights)

    Just out of curiosity, who certifies that these former industrial sites are safe for residential development?

    I’d hate to buy a place only to discover down the line that it’s unsafe.

    Thanks very much for the great blog!

  7. pesche22 said…
    its offical.. the banks are running
    Mills Corp.

    Mr. Fishes: what does this comment mean?

  8. Came across this study done on Housing by Harward in 2004. I thought, I never say this but even though I make over 100K, I feel I am in Low income bracket in NJ.

    Read complete study at
    http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/publications/markets/son2004.pdf

    From the summary

    Unfortunately, affordability pressures are unlikely to ease.
    Many of the low-wage jobs created by the economy do not
    pay enough for a household to afford (at 30 percent of
    income) even a modest one-bedroom rental anywhere in the
    country. Similarly, retirement incomes are so meager that
    many seniors face heavy housing cost burdens on top of escalating
    healthcare costs.

    Adding to the pressures on low-income households is the cost
    of supplying new affordable housing. Restrictive regulations
    and public resistance to high-density development make it
    difficult to replace or add lower-cost units. Prospects for additional
    income supports or housing subsidies are equally bleak.
    As the federal deficit balloons, the calls to cut spending on
    social and housing programs are growing even as the demand
    for and costs of these programs continue to escalate.

  9. pesche22 says:

    chic,,

    just what i said jpmorgan
    is running mills,,, read the
    wsj ,, article on mills corp.

  10. Roadtripboy says:

    The very idea that they would try to do to Rutherford what was done to Jersey City really appalls me. Rutherford is a charming, old, established town. I can’t stand the way developers are allowed to overdevelop an area, taxing the infrastructure beyond what it is capable of handling. This decreases overall quality of life for everyone and can have a negative effect on property values. But I guess as long as a few developers/investors make a financial killing, all is right with the world.

  11. Anonymous says:

    The builder must think we are all idiots. They claim that it won’t increase school taxes or traffic. Mixed use = taxpayer abuse. These idiots bought the land zoned commercial and that’s how it should remain. Too bad if they lose money. That’s the risk. 3400 concos means 7000 kids and 7000 more cars in an already miserable congested area. The latest scam these builders are using is mixed use. Mixed use means a dinky little laddy da strip mall with a coffee shop and as many units as they can possibly cram on there. Route 17, 3 and downtown traffic is already horrible. And for all the people that will take the train, where will they park their cars? Train parking is already non existent!!

    FIGHT BACK!! Write your legislator and your assemblymen!!

  12. Anonymous says:

    BTW…. I have a very bad feeling about club xanadu. I drive by there and all I see are some piles of dirt and some trailers. Loks like a scene right out of the Soprano’s. I have a feeling that we the people will be paying for this when it fails.

Comments are closed.