Can the subprime shakeup bring down the market?

From Bloomberg:

Housing Threatened by Defaults in Sub-Prime Mortgage Market

“As the Fed tries to tighten credit standards, some borrowers who planned to roll over a mortgage into a better product are going to get caught in the corridor and may end up in default,” said Joseph Stiglitz, the 2001 Nobel laureate in economics who teaches at Columbia University in New York.

Sub-prime mortgages, home loans with rates at least 2 or 3 percentage points above the safest, so-called prime loans, are given to people with poor or limited credit histories, or high debt burdens relative to their incomes. Such loans made up about a fifth of all new mortgages last year, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association in Washington.

The pool of money available to borrowers like Jones who don’t have the highest, or prime, credit ratings is shrinking as investors in mortgage-backed securities shy away from riskier sub-prime loans. More restrictive lending standards makes it more difficult for people to purchase houses, said Angelo Mozilo, chairman and chief executive officer of Calabasas, California- based Countrywide Financial Corp., the U.S.’s largest mortgage lender.

“If you get too restrictive on that, it could have a material effect not only on people’s lives, but it’s a chain reaction,” Mozilo said in a Dec. 5 interview. “If people can’t buy the used home, then the people who are in that home can’t buy a new one.”

U.S. foreclosures begun on sub-prime adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMs, rose to a four-year high of 2.19 percent in the third quarter as borrowers struggled to pay mortgage bills while interest rates increased, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported. During the five-year boom in housing prices, homeowners who fell behind on mortgage payments could sell their homes and pay off their loans or get better refinancing terms based on the higher value of their property.

The U.S. housing slump that began in 2006 probably will reach bottom in the third quarter of this year as sales of previously owned homes fall to an annualized rate of 5.9 million before rising to 6 million in the fourth quarter, according to a Jan. 17 forecast by David Berson, chief economist of Fannie Mae, the world’s largest mortgage buyer.

More regulation may eliminate the ability of homeowners with adjustable-rate mortgages, like Jones, to refinance with new loans, leaving them vulnerable to higher payments. Some mortgage bond investors say that may hurt both current loans and the overall housing market, according to Dale Westhoff, a senior managing director at New York-based Bear Stearns Cos., the largest underwriter of mortgage bonds.

Lenders such as General Electric Co.’s WMC Mortgage, Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co., New Century Financial Corp., and Fremont General Corp. have raised their criteria for sub- prime loans.

Underwriting standards for sub-prime loans have been too low for at least a year, resulting in loans being issued to borrowers who have little chance of paying them back, Shaughnessy said. That will hurt the insurance companies, pension funds and asset- management firms that are holding some of the U.S.’s $6 trillion of mortgage-backed securities in their portfolios, he said.

“There’s a monster beneath the surface of the financial markets,” Shaughnessy said. “No one knows when or where the credit crisis is going to rear its ugly head.”

Typical sub-prime loans have rates that are below the levels they will adjust to even if the Fed doesn’t raise rates. The ability of the so-called teaser rate to rise quickly causes some consumer protection groups to call the loans “exploding ARMs.”

“Some borrowers aren’t aware that with an exploding ARM, their rate can double in a two-year period,” said Sharon Reuss, a spokeswoman for the Center for Responsible Lending in Durham, North Carolina. “There’s too much smoke and mirrors.”

Investors are demanding an average 1.6 percentage points more than benchmark rates to buy BBB-rated bonds backed by sub- prime mortgages, up from about 1 percentage point in August, data compiled by Barclays Capital show. Investors seek “significantly” higher yields to own the securities whose underlying borrowers struggled to meet their obligations within a year of taking the loan, according to the securities unit of London-based Barclays Plc, the third-biggest U.K. bank.

“A lot of people cut corners in a bid to keep monthly payments low by taking out riskier adjustable loans at a time when fixed rates were near historic lows,” said Greg McBride, a senior financial analyst at Bankrate Inc., a research firm in North Palm Beach, Florida. “With the increase in short-term interest, that risk has come home to roost.”

This entry was posted in Economics, Housing Bubble. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Can the subprime shakeup bring down the market?

  1. James Bednar says:

    From the Daily Herald:

    Chicago Fed warns of ‘time bomb’ mortgages

    Officials of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago called on state agencies to clamp down on lenders that make high-risk mortgage loans to people who can’t afford them.

    In a conference at the bank on Wednesday, Federal Reserve examiner John Taylor said states need to put more resources into examining the lending and marketing practices of mortgage brokers before a rash of delinquencies and foreclosures do severe damage to housing markets. Mortgage brokers are regulated by states, not federal agencies.

    “I’m very concerned that there’s a ticking time bomb in (loan) portfolios,” Taylor said.

    Nontraditional mortgages, the kind that pop up when you sign into your e-mail, offer the chance to make small monthly payments for a set period of time, but eventually those loans reset, in some cases increasing monthly payments substantially.

    Analysts estimate that between $1 trillion and $2 trillion will be owed on these mortgage loans due to resetting in 2007 with an average 25 percent increase in monthly payments, meaning “payment shock,” said Allen Fishbein, Consumer Federation of America director of housing and credit policy.

  2. Freddie says:

    Subprime mortgages may have gotten buyers into the market but with many of those loans resetting over the next year or so the fear is an increase in foreclosures if these homeowners have not been able to convert to traditional mortgages. That the standard for lending was different for subprime was good for some people but if they did not use the grace period to qualify for a more traditional loan, or found a way to inject major cash into their monthly income, it does not look good for them keeping their home.
    Worse if they overpaid for the home in the first place, they may not even be able to sell the home for their purchase price. What a mess! Sold home and still carrying a mortgage balance.

  3. ithink_ithink says:

    JB,

    “Analysts estimate that between $1 trillion and $2 trillion will be owed on these mortgage loans due to resetting in 2007”

    Any indication regarding the reset value for ’08, ’09, & 10?

    The tides raises all ships or it’s tsunami?

    & how ‘global’ are the waters… any indicators regarding high liquidity ponzi schemes in emerging markets? I know their pay is rising in india & so how many are risking future earnings, because paychecks like real estate never shrinks?

  4. Chip says:

    I’m baffled that there is almost no mention anywhere of the prospect that declining prices will result in downward-adjusted comps so severe that many, many re-fi hopefuls will be locked out of any new loan, period. The days of the collusive appraiser should be close to done, and the hopeful borrow-mores are toast.

Comments are closed.