The new problem in the housing market … inventory

From the WSJ:

With Low Supply, Asking Prices Rise for Fifth Straight Month.

Home sellers are staying on the sidelines this summer, which is helping to firm up prices in more U.S. housing markets.

The number of homes listed for sale rose by just 0.5% in June from May and was down 19.4% from one year ago, according to Realtor.com. Slightly less than 1.89 million homes were listed for sale in June, which is lower than at any time in 2011 or 2010.

Listings are down in part because banks have been slower to move foreclosed properties onto the market and investors are buying up more of them at courthouse auction sales and renting them out. Meanwhile, traditional sellers are frequently unwilling to list their homes amid signs that prices are turning around in more markets. And in some of the markets with the biggest inventory drops, many owe more than their homes are worth and may be unable to sell without taking a big loss.

Compared with one year ago, listings were down in all but two of the 146 markets tracked by Realtor.com. Inventory has fallen by nearly 58% in Oakland, Calif.; by 49% in Fresno, Calif.; by 47% in Bakersfield, Calif.; and by 43% in Seattle.

Big inventory drops are pushing up prices. Median asking prices rose for the fifth straight month and were 2.7% higher than one year ago, though they were up by just 0.05% for the month. By contrast, last year’s disappointing spring sales season prompted sellers to cut prices by 1% in June from May.

Another sign of the improvement this spring: The median age of inventory listed for sale fell by nearly 10% from one year ago. That means sellers are finding buyers more quickly for their homes.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 182 Comments

Housing math more painful than trig.

From the WSJ:

Yea! Home Prices Hitting Bottom. Now, the Bad News.

This is a great time to buy a home in many parts of the country. There are signs that the downward price spiral is bottoming out. Mortgage rates are at historic lows.

The next few years could well be remembered as the best opportunity for Americans to buy homes since the postwar baby boom.

But one group’s opportunity is another group’s problem. Tens of millions of baby boomers and other home owners have seen their equity shrunken or wiped out completely. Many were counting on their homes to help finance their retirements. Often they have been waiting for years for the market to turn. Now they find themselves on the short end of the deal, sellers into the buyer’s market of the century.

“It’s a really challenging environment to be a seller,” says Lawrence Glazer, wealth adviser at Mayflower Advisors in Boston. “Unfortunately, many people planning to retire may have no choice.”

The last crash took more than a decade to work through—and this market could take an especially long time because the huge accumulation of empty, foreclosed houses will hold down prices for all properties.

When adjusted for inflation, the Case-Shiller index didn’t return to its 1989 peak until 2000. Some markets, such as New York and Los Angeles, didn’t hit new highs until 2002. This time may be even worse because the bubble was much, much bigger. Some locations may not recover their inflation-adjusted peak in our lifetimes.

The bottom line? The national housing market may take many years to recover. It’s a buyer’s market, but home owners hoping to sell need to do their math first.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 92 Comments

Homes go big again

From Bloomberg:

Long-shrinking homes begin to grow again

Even as the U.S. economy struggles to rebound from the worst recession since the Great Depression, Americans are living larger.

Larger, as in larger homes: two-story foyers, twin front staircases, children’s wings, dedicated man caves, coffee bars, four-car garages and bedroom closets large enough for a fifth vehicle.

The percentage of new single-family homes greater than 3,000 square feet has grown by one-third in the last decade, according to data released last month by the U.S. Census Bureau. Slightly more than 1 in 4 new homes built last year were larger than 3,000 square feet, the highest percentage since 2007.

Census Bureau reports that the average size of a U.S. house rose in 2011 to 2,480 square feet, up from 2,392 square feet in 2010. The 2011 figure is 62.6 percent larger than the 1,525-square-foot average size in 1973.

Demand for large, luxury homes began dropping in September 2005, said Christopher Gaffney, a group president for Toll Brothers home builder, right after Hurricane Katrina ravaged the Gulf Coast. Since then, it’s been an up-and-down cycle. “It was just a matter of when things would turn around, not if,” Gaffney said. “People got tired of putting their lives on hold.”

Danny Jong, a New York commercial and residential real estate investor, needed a place for his mother and the children that he and his wife would like to have.

“I grew up in a big house,” said Jong, 41, who was raised in New Jersey. “Why not go bigger if you can afford it?”

He said he’s not sure what he’ll do with all the space in the Toll Brothers house he bought in Randolph, N.J. A live-in housekeeper will take up some room. He said Toll Brothers’ reputation for quality, low interest rates, price per square foot and proximity to his New York office influenced his family’s decision.

Posted in Economics, National Real Estate, New Development | 38 Comments

Foreclosure Friday

From the Star Ledger:

Foreclosures drop in New Jersey

The number of New Jersey homes in foreclosure dropped in the first six months of the year, according to a report from RealtyTrac, from 18,417 last June to 10,733 this year, easing fears of a flood of filings.

Nationwide, foreclosure filings were up 2 percent from the previous six months, but down 11 percent from the same time period last year, according to the report.
In February, the New Jersey Supreme Court unfroze foreclosure procedures and clarified what information must be included in paperwork that initiates the process, known as the notice of intent to foreclose. At the time, it was estimated there were 50,000 to 100,000 unprocessed foreclosures in limbo.

Yesterday’s data also followed a national financial settlement in February with five major lenders on foreclosure-processing abuses known as “robo-signing.”

“We had been concerned after the settlement that we’d see a real rise in foreclosures,” said Stan Humphries, chief economist at Zillow, a real estate firm. “We are seeing an increase in some states, but that rate is well below what it was previously,” he said, noting that foreclosure filings peaked in the summer of 2009. Since then, banks, mortgage brokers and even some states have moved aggressively to stem the tide.

From NJBIZ:

N.J. foreclosure activity jumps, but expert says timing is perfect

Foreclosure activity in New Jersey in the second quarter of 2012 significantly increased compared to the same period in the previous year, according to a report from Irvine, Calif.-based RealtyTrac.

But a real estate expert said the timing couldn’t be better for an increase in foreclosures, with the state’s housing market improving and banks becoming more proactive in the foreclosure process, following a lift of the state’s moratorium and a multibillion-dollar national foreclosure settlement.

“The moratorium had the effect of delaying an increase in foreclosure inventory from worse times to better times,” said Jeffrey Otteau, president of Otteau Valuation Group. “What we’re seeing now is the problem is not getting worse but better, because banks are now moving forward.”

According to the report, foreclosure actions in New Jersey declined 10.44 percent from May and 1.32 percent from the first quarter of 2012, but increased by 65.91 percent from the second quarter of 2011. In the United States, foreclosures declined 3.96 percent from May, 2.55 percent from the first quarter of the year and 8.21 percent from the second quarter of 2011.

But Otteau said regardless of the increase in foreclosure filings, New Jersey is beginning to close the gap between the number of homes entering foreclosure and the amount of completed transactions, which he said is a greater indicator of a state’s health in the real estate market.

“The housing market this year is in its strongest position of the last five years and better able to absorb the distressed inventory that is being introduced into the market,” Otteau said, noting that, year to date, home sales are up 24 percent and inventory is down 14. “Between the properties going into foreclosure and the ones we’re selling, we’re down to a net gap of only about 400 houses a month. By next year at this time, we should be seeing a sales surplus, and some states have already reached that point. Our foreclosure problem should begin to shrink.”

Posted in Economics, Foreclosures, Housing Recovery | 180 Comments

44 Economists Agree: Housing is Bottoming

From the WSJ:

Housing Passes a Milestone

The housing market has turned—at last.

The U.S. finally has moved beyond attention-grabbing predictions from housing “experts” that housing is bottoming. The numbers are now convincing.

Nearly seven years after the housing bubble burst, most indexes of house prices are bending up. “We finally saw some rising home prices,” S&P’s David Blitzer said a few weeks ago as he reported the first monthly increase in the slow-moving S&P/Case-Shiller house-price data after seven months of declines.

Nearly 10% more existing homes were sold in May than in the same month a year earlier, many purchased by investors who plan to rent them for now and sell them later, an important sign of an inflection point. In something of a surprise, the inventory of existing homes for sale has fallen close to the normal level of six months’ worth despite all the foreclosed homes that lenders own. The fraction of homes that are vacant is at its lowest level since 2006.

The reduced inventory of unsold homes is key, says Mark Fleming, chief economist at CoreLogic, a housing data-analysis firm. For the past couple of years, house prices have risen in the spring and then slumped; the declining supply of houses for sale is reason to believe that won’t happen again this year, he says.

Builders began work on 26% more single-family homes in May 2012 than the depressed levels of May 2011. The stock of unsold newly built homes is back to 2005 levels. In each of the past four quarters, housing construction has added to economic growth. In the first quarter, it accounted for 0.4 percentage points of the meager 1.9% growth rate.

“Even with the overall economy slowing,” Wells Fargo Securities economists said, cautiously, in a note to clients, “the budding recovery in the housing market appears to be gradually gaining momentum.”

Economists aren’t always right, but on this at least they agree: A new Wall Street Journal survey of forecasters found 44 believe the housing market has reached its bottom; only three don’t.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 161 Comments

Just pull the damn band-aid off already

From CNBC:

As Foreclosures Ramp Up, New Roadblocks Ahead

Fraudulent foreclosure practices, a.k.a. “robo-signing,” uncovered now nearly two years ago, opened a new wound in the foreclosure crisis that was in the process of healing.

At big bank mortgage servicers and in courts in many states, the foreclosure process ground to a halt, and the pipeline of delinquent loans swelled to historic levels. Lawsuits abounded and lengthy settlement negotiations on all levels of government began.

Nearly two years later, the foreclosure mechanism is just starting to move again.

Foreclosure starts, the first phase of the process, rose nearly 12 percent in May month-to-month, according to a new report from Lender Processing Services. Foreclosures sales, when the property goes back to the bank or to a bidder at the courthouse steps, rose 10 percent.

The ramp-up, while still way off the volumes of 2010 (pre-robo-signing), is largely due to the $25 billion settlement reached early this year between 49 state attorneys general and the nation’s largest mortgage servicers.

It all comes down to consumer protections versus a speedy recovery to housing. Whether it’s lenders trying to save borrowers from foreclosure through modifications and principal reduction, or laws trying to protect borrowers from faulty foreclosure processing, or inventive ways to change what is owed on a mortgage, the plain fact is that many borrowers simply cannot afford the homes they are in.

The majority of the 5.5 million properties whose mortgages are either delinquent or already in the foreclosure process will end up on the auction block.

There is a strong argument that the housing market needs to heal itself before it can grow again, no matter how painful that healing process may be. Clearly American consumers were not well-protected during the historic housing boom, nor during the ensuing bust. Laws needed to be changed, and banks needed to be held accountable and punished for fraudulent practices.

The question now is: When do we step back and let the wounds of this crisis heal?

Posted in Foreclosures, Housing Recovery | 203 Comments

North Jersey Contracts – June 2012

(Source GSMLS, except Bergen which is NJMLS)

Pending Home Sales (Contracts)
——————————-

Bergen County
June 2011 – 747
June 2012 – 871 (Up 16.6% YOY)

Essex County
June 2011 – 340
June 2012 – 438 (Up 28.8% YOY)

Hunterdon County
June 2011 – 106
June 2012 – 147 (Up 38.7% YOY)

Morris County
June 2011 – 418
June 2012 – 519 (Up 24.2% YOY)

Passaic County
June 2011 – 195
June 2012 – 259 (Up 32.8% YOY)

Somerset County
June 2011 – 299
June 2012 – 338 (Up 13.0% YOY)

Sussex County
June 2011 – 130
June 2012 – 137 (Up 5.4% YOY)

Union County
June 2011 – 311
June 2012 – 402 (Up 29.3% YOY)

Warren County
June 2011 – 87
June 2012 – 91 (Up 4.6% YOY)

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, North Jersey Real Estate | 245 Comments

Something to do while you sit around in the AC Open Discussion

From the Movoto Blog:

Real World Monopoly: Marvin Gardens is the New Boardwalk

We were both renters and landlords, we fought over who could be the ‘car’ and we hid stashes of $100s under the board. Monopoly took hold on generations as one of the most famous board games in the world. Perhaps it was because we made huge investing mistakes, had terrible luck, went belly up, but could start over the next day. And unlike in real life, you could get out of jail for free.

Movoto Real Estate thought it would be fun to put on a top hat or thimble and take a spin around the board to revisit the properties that made up Monopoly. Since we’re a real estate company, it makes sense that we try and make comparisons between the properties that Monopoly was originally based on and those same properties as they exist today. Movoto found some interesting tidbits and some surprises, too.

Posted in Humor | 48 Comments

Jobs Day Open Discussion

From the NYT:

Jobs Report Preview

The Labor Department releases its report on June job growth on Friday, and economists are crossing their fingers for some good news.

“Good news” is a relative term, of course.

In May, the nation’s employers added a measly 69,000 jobs, whereas a gain of 125,000 to 150,000 jobs is needed just to keep up with the growth in the working-age population before even touching the backlog of nearly 13 million unemployed Americans. The median forecast for June is that job growth ticked up slightly to 90,000 jobs, and that the unemployment rate stayed flat at 8.2 percent.

That 90,000 number is a relatively small fraction of the growth rate many economists had been expecting just a few months ago.
During the winter, the economy seemed to be picking up steam, as private companies took on more and more workers and the unemployment rate dropped precipitously. In January, for example, nonfarm payrolls grew by 275,000 jobs.

But job growth slowed suddenly in March, April and May. That led some economists to wonder if the unseasonably warm winter, rather than a fundamentally healthier economy, had been the source of the temporary employment surge.

“The weather distortion should be finished now, so we should have a somewhat cleaner reading of what’s actually happening with payrolls,” said Andrew Tilton, a senior United States economist at Goldman Sachs.

The question is whether that cleaner reading is a sustainably higher one as well.

Posted in Economics, Employment | 138 Comments

How much further can rents rise?

From Reuters:

US apartment rents rise at highest rate since ’07 -Reis

Renting an apartment in the U.S. became even more expensive during the second quarter, as vacancies set a new 10-year low and rents rose at a pace not seen since before the financial crisis, according to real estate research firm Reis Inc.

The average U.S. vacancy rate of 4.7 percent was the lowest since the fourth quarter of 2001, down 0.2 percentage points from the prior quarter, according to preliminary data Reis released on Thursday.

Asking rents jumped to $1,091 per month, 1 percent higher than the first quarter and the biggest increase since the third quarter of 2007. Excluding special perks designed to lure tenants, like months of free rent, the average effective rent rose 1.3 percent to $1,041.

“The improvement in rents is pretty pervasive,” said Ryan Severino, Senior Economist at Reis. “Even in places like Providence and Knoxville, which you don’t think of as hotbeds for apartment activity, landlords felt the market was strong enough to raise rents on their tenants.”

Severino characterized the broad increase in rental prices last quarter as “pretty amazing.”

Apartment dwellers have been facing higher rents since late 2009 but the pace of increase has been picking up steam over the past three quarters.

The surge in rental prices stems from a growing number of people who are looking for places to live, but are not willing or able to buy a home because of the ongoing slump in the housing market and tight lending conditions.

A dearth of new construction has also led more and more people to squeeze into tight urban areas at higher prices.

Generation Y has also been a driving force for higher rental prices in urban areas, particularly in cities like New York and San Francisco, where job markets are relatively strong. Even though home ownership costs less than renting, young professionals prefer to rent apartments in tightly packed cities than move out to the spacious suburbs, Severino said.

“This generation doesn’t hold home ownership on a pedestal the way prior generations did,” he said.

The particularly dense and expensive rental market of New York City loosened up slightly in the second quarter, with vacancies inching up 0.2 percentage points. Yet with a vacancy rate of 2.2 percent, New York remains the tightest market in the country and is by far the most expensive.

New York’s effective rents rose at a rapid 1.7 percent clip from the previous quarter and 3.9 percent from a year earlier. The average renter’s effective monthly tab of $2,935 beats the second-most expensive city, San Francisco, by over $1,000.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 76 Comments

Trulia: Rents rising faster than prices

From CNN/Money:

Rents keep rising, while home prices inch higher

As if record low mortgage rates and beaten down home prices weren’t enough to get prospective home buyers off the fence, there’s another factor that has made the case for buying even stronger: rising rents.

U.S. rents rose an average of 5.4% over the 12 months ended June 30, according to real estate website Trulia. Demand from former homeowners displaced by foreclosure and potential homebuyers who failed to qualify for mortgages have helped to send rents skyward.

“With rents rising faster than prices in most markets, buying is getting even more affordable relative to renting,” said Jed Kolko, Trulia’s chief economist.

Meanwhile, asking prices on homes listed for sale inched up a mere 0.3% over the same period, according to Trulia’s data. And while that’s the fourth increase in home prices in five months — an indication that prices may be starting to recover — the gains are modest compared to the increases in rental rates over the past 12 months.

From Forbes:

Rising Home Prices Can’t Keep Up with Rent Increases

The Trulia Price Monitor and Trulia Rent Monitor are the earliest leading indicators of how asking prices and rents are trending nationally and locally. They adjust for the changing mix of listed homes and therefore show what’s really happening to asking prices and rents. Because asking prices lead sales prices by approximately two or more months, the Monitors reveal trends before other price indexes do. With that, here’s the scoop on where prices and rents are headed.

Asking prices were up once again month over month in June, by 0.3%. Aside from May, when asking prices increased by so little that they were essentially unchanged, asking prices have moved up every month since February. Now, even the year-over-year price change is positive. Foreclosures hold back price gains; when we exclude foreclosed homes, prices are up 1.7% year-over-year. At the local level, prices have risen quarter-over-quarter in 84 of the 100 largest metros, seasonally adjusted – these widespread gains are in addition to the typical springtime boost. Now that’s real progress.

Although prices have increased, rents have risen faster, at 5.4% year over year. In 22 of the 25 largest rental markets, rents are outpacing prices. This means that buying a home is becoming an even better deal relative to renting – that is, for those who can qualify for a mortgage and put up the down payment.

Are there any signs of rents slowing down? Not really. In most markets, the year-over-year increase in June was higher than in March. In San Francisco, for instance, rents were up 14.7% year over year in June compared with 10.9% in March. Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia and Houston have also seen rent increases accelerate since March.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 32 Comments

CoreLogic HPI shows broad price gains in May

From CoreLogic:

CoreLogic® Home Price Index Shows 1.8% Monthly Increase in May from April

The CoreLogic Home Price Index (HPI) showed that home prices nationwide, including distressed sales, increased on a year-over-year basis by 2.0 percent in May 2012 compared to May 2011. On a month-over-month basis, home prices, including distressed sales, also increased by 1.8 percent in May 2012 compared to April 2012*. The May 2012 figures mark the third consecutive increase in home prices nationwide on both a year-over-year and month-over-month basis.

Excluding distressed sales, home prices nationwide increased on a year-over-year basis by 2.7 percent in May 2012 compared to May 2011. On a month-over-month basis excluding distressed sales, the CoreLogic HPI indicates home prices increased 2.3 percent in May 2012 compared to April 2012, the fourth month-over-month increase in a row. Distressed sales include short sales and real estate owned (REO) transactions.

“Home price appreciation in the lower-priced segment of the market is rebounding more quickly than in the upper end,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic. “Home prices below 75 percent of the national median increased 5.7 percent from a year ago, compared to only a 1.8 percent increase for prices 125 percent or more of the median.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery | 156 Comments

Housing Affordability back to year 2000 levels in Bergen (including taxes)

From the Record:

Home prices coming down to earth in Bergen County, could signal market turnaround

With typical prices below $400,000, and mortgage rates south of 4 percent, homes in Bergen County in 2011 reached their most affordable levels in years — just about at the point where a majority of households can afford the typically priced home, an analysis by The Record has found.

That has opened the door to more middle-income buyers and raised the possibility that home values may begin to stabilize.

“There was a point a few years ago where you had to be pretty rich to afford a house in this area. Now, you don’t have to be so rich,” said David Blitzer, a housing economist at Standard & Poor’s.

The move toward affordability is evidence that the real-estate market, at least in Bergen County, may be reaching a turning point. Even amid a high rate of foreclosures, tight credit standards and high unemployment, the fact that more buyers can afford homes eases some of the downward price pressure in the region, and gives hope to discouraged sellers that there may be buyers out there.

“I don’t think [sellers] will have to keep dropping and dropping and dropping the price,” Blitzer said.

“If interest rates were any higher, there’s no way we would have been able to buy our house,” said Joshua Baris, a Coldwell Banker real-estate agent who bought a three-bedroom Dutch colonial in Tenafly last year. He and his wife, Hilary, locked in a rate just below 4 percent and a price — $660,000 — that was down dramatically from the earlier asking price above $800,000.

Similarly, Jaclyn and Nick Casasnovas didn’t think they’d be able to buy in northern Bergen County when they decided to move from their North Arlington apartment. But lower prices and interest rates allowed them to afford a three-bedroom house in Waldwick.

“I didn’t even think it was feasible that we could move to an area like this,” said Jaclyn Casasnovas, 30, a proposal writer for a telecommunications company and mother of a 1-year-old son.

The numbers clearly show how the market has changed. For example, a $392,000 house in a middle-tier community like Midland Park now costs about $2,347 a month in mortgage payments, property taxes and homeowners’ insurance, which consumes about 32 percent of the typical household income in the county.

That’s down from 2007, when a Midland Park house priced at $465,000, the county median, cost $3,056 in mortgage, property tax and insurance payments and consumed 41 percent of typical household incomes.

For its analysis, The Record adopted the federal government’s benchmark for affordability, assuming that housing payments (including mortgage, property taxes and insurance) total no more than 31 percent of a household’s gross income. It assumed a mortgage interest rate of 4 percent and 2011 median home prices: $392,000 in Bergen County and $288,000 in Passaic County, as well as incomes averaging $87,400 in Bergen County and $59,600 in Passaic.

The analysis also assumed a 20 percent down payment, a longtime benchmark — though, admittedly, one that is difficult for many households to achieve.

At those numbers, Bergen County households with a typical income would spend 31.9 percent of their monthly income to buy the typical home, down from 42 percent at the height of the housing bubble in 2006 and just below the 32 percent level of 2000. Median-income households in Passaic, by contrast, would have to spend 37.8 percent of their income on housing.

“Monthly mortgage payments, relative to family income, are back to 2000 levels,” said David Stiff, Fiserv’s chief economist. “All the deterioration in affordability that occurred during the housing bubble has been erased.

“But New York is still an extremely expensive market,” he continued. “If you’re a low-income household, affordability is a real problem.”

Otteau said the increased affordability is a signal to buyers that “if you’re considering buying a house, it’s now a safe time to cross the road.”

“Prices are not likely to go lower except in outlying, rural parts of the state or in the largest urban centers,” he said.

But that doesn’t mean sellers can pump up their asking prices. Buyers can’t overpay because their incomes aren’t rising much and banks are no longer willing to write unrealistically large mortgages.

“The likelihood of recouping a price from three or four years ago is very low,” Otteau said. “If you’re a seller, it’s a better time to sell now, but the property needs to be priced competitively.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery | 123 Comments

Friday Open Discussion and Legal Review

From Bloomberg:

Eminent Domain Is Bad Ploy for Underwater Mortgages

Officials in San Bernardino County, California, believe they have figured out a clever way to solve the county’s, and possibly the nation’s, housing problems.

Detailed by a Cornell University professor, and pitched by influential San Francisco investors who stand to make a fortune from it, this new idea is based on one of the oldest concepts: the taking of other people’s property.

County officials, joined by the cities of Ontario and Fontana, are considering using an expansive interpretation of eminent domain — typically used to acquire real property to build public works — to seize the mortgages, not the real property, of those homeowners who owe more than their homes are worth.

The funds would be provided by private investors, who would pay the holders of the mortgages “fair market value” and then write new ones for the homeowners based on much lower principal amounts, reflecting the new depressed values of the homes. The firm behind this complex plan, Mortgage Resolution Partners, may be in the running to acquire vast numbers of mortgages at discounted rates. Local officials would have, theoretically, solved their local housing problems. Homeowners would stay in their homes and have much lower mortgages.

Advocates tout it as a win-win solution, but the holders of the mortgages must give up their assets and accept whatever value the governmental authority assigns to their notes.

The “fair market value” probably wouldn’t be based on an expected sales price of the home, but on a wholesale value that would be at least 20 percent lower than that, said Mark Dowling, the chief executive officer of the Inland Valleys Association of Realtors. (The value would probably be based on the fair market value of the mortgage — the home price minus many transaction costs — and thus far lower than the fair market value of the home itself.)

There would surely be unintended consequences. Grabbing private mortgages could lead to a widespread reluctance by private firms to lend money in the county — or at least an increase in the cost of lending in that area. That would be a particular problem given that an obstacle to a revived housing market, especially in low-income, high-unemployment areas, is the inability of homebuyers to qualify for mortgages.

As Gideon Kanner, professor emeritus at Loyola Law School, argues, “If you make a reduction in loan balance available, whether by eminent domain or otherwise, these people will be provided with a powerful incentive to stop making payments on their mortgages, hoping to get bailed out by the government.”

However it shakes out, the plan would create perverse incentives. Mainly, it seems like a way for big players to muscle out the smaller investors who now are competing for short sales and foreclosures.

Posted in Economics, Foreclosures, Housing Recovery, Mortgages, Politics | 204 Comments

Spring strength continues into May

From MarketWatch:

Pending home sales surge 5.9% in May to 2-yr high

Pending home sales climbed 5.9% in May to match a two-year high, a trade group said Wednesday. The National Association of Realtors said its pending-home-sales index rose to 101.1 in May from 95.5 in April. The index is 13.3% above May 2011 levels. May marked the highest level since the scheduled expiration of the home buyer tax credit in April 2010. A sale is listed as pending when the contract has been signed but the transaction has not closed. An index of 100 is equal to the average level of contract activity during 2001.

From the WSJ:

Housing’s Boost: Time to Stop Blaming Weather?

Maybe it wasn’t the weather.

For months, economists have mused over whether the surprisingly strong start to the spring housing market has come from an unseasonably warm winter that simply led buyers back into the market earlier than usual.

But Wednesday’s report on pending home sales shows that housing demand hasn’t eased heading into the traditional peak buying season, despite an early start to the spring, the economic storm clouds in Europe and a slower rate of job growth at home.

An index that measures the number of contracts signed to purchase previously owned homes rose in May to match its March level, the highest in nearly two years. Pending sales were up by 13.3% from last year, and up by 5.9% from April, according to the National Association of Realtors.

Contract activity hasn’t been a perfect indicator of future sales activity. Many buyers are unable to secure deals due to difficulties with loan approvals or low home appraisals. Also, many contracts are subject to bank approval because the home seller owes more than the home is worth.

As a result, someone who went under contract in March, only to see the deal fall apart, might have gone under contract on a separate home in May.

Still, May’s reading shows broad strength, helped by mortgage rates that continue to plumb record lows. Pending sales were up in every part of the country, up by 19.8% in the Northeast and 22.1% in the Midwest, compared with one year ago. Activity was up by 11.9% in the South and 4.8% in the West.

Right now, all the signs point to a housing market that “has hit bottom and started an upswing,” wrote Dean Baker, the housing economist who has long maintained a bearish outlook for housing, on Tuesday.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery | 236 Comments