Why would anyone buy a home today?

From MarketWatch:

Home buyers advised to look before they leap

Fox-Pitt Kelton home-builder analyst Robert Stevenson said Wednesday he thinks this year will turn out to be “a bad time to buy a home” as the U.S. economy loses more jobs, especially if buyers don’t plan on staying in the house for at least several years.

“While some suggest that now is great time to buy a home given low mortgage rates and falling home prices, we believe that for most homebuyers, the opposite is true,” Stevenson said in a report to clients.

“Buyers who lose their jobs or who stay in their homes for less than seven years stand to incur substantial losses as home prices decline further in 2009 and the U.S. experiences more moderate home-price appreciation going forward,” Fox-Pitt said. “We believe too few buyers do the simple break-even math before sinking their life savings into a house.”

With average rates on 30-year mortgages falling to around 5% and the government pumping liquidity into the mortgage market, many homeowners are rushing to refinance. But while the lower rates make homes more affordable, the days of buying homes with little or no down payment and shaky credit scores are long gone.

For buyers, the big fear is purchasing a house that will be worth less a year later, or even longer. Homeowners who bought at the peak of the housing bubble are underwater on their mortgages, meaning they owe more on the loan than the house is worth — and some are simply walking away.

National home prices were down 23% from their July 2006 peak through October, and Stevenson at Fox-Pitt predicted an incremental 20% drop in prices before bottoming, a peak-to-trough decline of roughly 40%.

“While a drop of 40% seems absurdly high … it would only put home prices back to where they were at the beginning of 2002,” Stevenson said.

The analyst’s bearish outlook is based largely on escalating unemployment, and jobs are the lifeblood of the housing market.

“As if 2008 weren’t bad enough for housing — given the mounting foreclosures, falling home prices, and a tightening credit market — millions more Americans are now in danger of losing their jobs,” said Stevenson at Fox-Pitt. “As unemployment heads towards 8%, we expect foreclosures to spike, taking home prices down materially.”

“If unemployment can be held under 8%, we believe the housing market will start a slow recovery beginning in 2010,” Stevenson said. “However, if the bears are correct and the U.S. experiences 9% [or higher] unemployment in [the second half of 2009] or 2010, we believe the housing market could experience a meltdown even more severe than the one we’ve experienced in the past few years.”

On the supply side of housing, there remains a sizable overhang of unsold homes on the market. The supply of both new and existing homes is massive by historical standards, and a surge in foreclosures would only add to the glut if the government can’t find a solution to the foreclosure problem.

Buyers who do jump into the housing market should consider the possibility that they may need to stay in the home for many years in order to come out ahead, assuming home prices fall substantially further.

“Given the likelihood of a meaningful decline in home values in 2009, we continue to wonder why anyone would buy a home today,” said Stevenson, the home-builder analyst, in a loud and clear warning to buyers.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 137 Comments

Tough decisions… Painful cuts…

From the Daily Journal:

New Jersey cuts will hurt homeowners

Gov. Jon S. Corzine wants to cut school aid by $75 million and aid to cities by $15 million to help close a $2.1 billion budget gap.

There’s no question some tough decisions on painful cuts will have to be made to make up the difference in lost state revenues because of the recession. Everyone is aware of the seriousness of the financial crisis affecting governments, private employers and employees, homeowners and taxpayers.

The cuts will affect everything from school breakfast programs to mosquito control to equipment for the state police. The governor even is proposing a wage freeze for state workers, which union leaders are rejecting, and reducing state payments to the pension fund. More cuts may be needed considering the state’s falling revenues and the deepening recession.

Unfortunately, it’s property owners who will pay the price for these cuts, not only because of a reduction in services provided by the state this year, but also in increased property taxes next year when the state will have a projected $5 billion budget deficit. Depending on the state of the economy and state revenues, the budget gap could be even more. It’s a simple mathematical equation: If the state cuts funds to schools and aid to cities, local property taxpayers have to make up the shortfall or schools and municipalities have to cut programs and services — a double whammy on local communities.

The country, state and local municipalities are facing some difficult financial times. Families are tightening their belts to weather this financial storm. Governments will have to do the same by cutting spending. They will have to reduce the size of government, share more services and consolidate to save money. They will have to seriously consider wage and hiring freezes for workers.

If these things aren’t done, the financial hole taxpayers and the state are in will only grow deeper.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 206 Comments

Cheap Thrift is the new black

From the Wall Street Journal:

Hard-Hit Families Finally Start Saving, Aggravating Nation’s Economic Woes

Rick and Noreen Capp recently reduced their credit-card debt, opened a savings account and stopped taking their two children to restaurants. Jessica and Alan Muir have started buying children’s clothes at steep markdowns, splitting bulk-food purchases with other families and gathering their firewood instead of buying it for $200 a cord.

As layoffs and store closures grip Boise, these two local families hope their newfound frugality will see them through the economic downturn. But this same thriftiness, embraced by families across the U.S., is also a major reason the downturn may not soon end. Americans, fresh off a decadeslong buying spree, are finally saving more and spending less — just as the economy needs their dollars the most.

Usually, frugality is good for individuals and for the economy. Savings serve as a reservoir of capital that can be used to finance investment, which helps raise a nation’s standard of living. But in a recession, increased saving — or its flip side, decreased spending — can exacerbate the economy’s woes. It’s what economists call the “paradox of thrift.”

U.S. household debt, which has been growing steadily since the Federal Reserve began tracking it in 1952, declined for the first time in the third quarter of 2008. In the same quarter, U.S. consumer spending growth declined for the first time in 17 years.

That has resulted in a rise in the personal saving rate, which the government calculates as the difference between earnings and expenditures. In recent years, as Americans spent more than they earned, the personal saving rate dipped below zero. Economists now expect the rate to rebound to 3% to 5%, or even higher, in 2009, among the sharpest reversals since World War II. Goldman Sachs last week predicted the 2009 saving rate could be as high as 6% to 10%.

As savings increase, economists say, spending is likely to contract further. They expect gross domestic product to decline at an annualized rate of at least 5% in the fourth quarter, the biggest drop in a quarter-century.

“The idea that the American family will quickly spend us out of this recession is a fantasy. It won’t happen,” said Elizabeth Warren, a professor of law at Harvard University who last month was named chair of the Congressional oversight panel tasked with overseeing the distribution of the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program funds.

Posted in Economics, National Real Estate | 361 Comments

“It’s a very sad time for everybody.”

From the Asbury Park Press:

The Shore’s economy is expected to slump in 2009

The Shore’s economy is expected to tumble again in 2009 as consumers, worried about falling home prices, reeling from investment losses and bracing for possible layoffs, rein in their spending.

It’s the consequence of the asset bubble created earlier this decade by consumers who, with easy access to credit, lived beyond their means. Now the bill is due. Consumers need to scale back, and the economy is suffering.

“The paradox facing the country is, how can a country that got itself into deep peril by borrowing and spending without limits now borrow and spend its way back to prosperity?” said James W. Hughes, a Rutgers University economist.

New Jersey’s economy, virtually stagnant earlier in the decade, was pulled under water by the national economy, a victim of the housing market whose mortgages were pooled together into securities and sold to investors.

Homeowners’ incomes didn’t keep pace with their home payments, and they began to default. Investment banks faced bankruptcy just two years after recording record profits. Stock market indexes lost upwards of 40 percent. Banks turned cautious, reducing lending and bringing economic activity to a near halt.

The result so far: New Jersey lost 34,400 jobs during the first 11 months of 2008 and the state’s private sector was on course to end the decade without any net growth, Hughes said.

The forecast for 2009 is for more trouble ahead. Why?

— The housing sector has yet to stabilize. Home prices statewide on average have fallen about 20 percent from their peak in 2005, and they are expected to fall another 8 percentage points to bring them in line with workers’ incomes, said Jeffrey G. Otteau, president of the Otteau Valuation Group, an East Brunswick real-estate consulting firm.

The industry is expected to see another wave of homeowners whose mortgage rates spike, thus pushing their payments beyond what they can afford. Additionally, there is the problem of people who would like to buy a home, but put such dreams on hold because they worry they will be laid off.

— Consumer spending has deteriorated. Shoppers in Eatontown said they were taking steps on their own to live more frugally. But many of them couldn’t spend with abandon, even if they wanted.

The reason: Homeowners earlier in the decade used the ever-rising values of their homes to go on a spending binge. They could refinance and take cash. They could get a home-equity loan to renovate their home, pay for college or even pay off their credit cards.

With home values on the decline, they can’t borrow as much, if at all. Home buyers, for example, who put 20 percent down to buy a home in 2005, would have little equity since home values have declined just as much.

The ripple effect is widespread. Consumers spend less. Corporate revenue declines. Companies lay off workers to remain profitable.

“An economy that’s 70 percent dependent on household consumption would like to see people spending more, but given the lack of savings, it’s a good thing that people are starting to save,” said Patrick J. O’Keefe, a director at J.H. Cohn, a
Roseland-based accounting firm.

— Stores are closing and vacancies rising. The impact can already be seen in towns such as Red Bank, where some store owners have written farewell messages on their windows.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, Shore Real Estate | 297 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion

This is the time and place to post observations about your local areas, comments on news stories or the New Jersey housing market, open house reports, etc. If you have any questions you wanted to ask earlier in the week but never posted them up, let’s have them. Also a good place to post suggestions, requests for information, criticism, and praise.

For readers that have never commented, there is a link at the top of each message that is typically labelled “[#] Comments“. Go ahead and give that a click, you might be missing out on a world of information you didn’t know about. While you are there, introduce yourselves to everyone.

For new readers that have only read the messages displayed on the main page, take a look through the archives, a substantial amount of information has been put online in the past year. The archives can be accessed by using the links found in the menus on the right hand side of the page.

Posted in General | 315 Comments

As goes Wall Street…

From Reuters:

As Wall Street suffers, so does nearby New Jersey

The Wall Street upheaval that has depressed New York City’s high-flying real estate market is also slowing property sales and lowering prices right across the river in the state of New Jersey.

Long known as the city’s “sixth borough” due to its proximity to New York, Hudson County, New Jersey, basked in Wall Street’s boom as financial firms relocated back office operations there to avoid skyscraping Manhattan rents, said Derrick Gross of the house-hunting website StreetEasy.com.

Now Hudson, home to two of New Jersey’s highest-profile cities, Jersey City and Hoboken, is feeling the pain of the bust. Sales have slowed to a crawl and homes for sale are piling up.

“New York is one of the epicenters of the accelerated recession — or the potential depression — because of how important the financial industry is,” said Bill Staniford, chief executive of real estate research website PropertyShark.com. “There is going to be a softening affecting anyone in the vicinity.”

At the current pace of sales, which in November was down 47 percent from last year, it would take 24.1 months for all the properties on the market in Hudson County to sell, said Jeffrey Otteau, president of Otteau Valuation Group, a real estate consultancy and appraisal service.

“The weakness that’s been gripping everyone else has just come home to roost in Manhattan, and that’s affecting Hudson County,” Otteau said.

Job losses in the financial sector are reducing housing demand in Manhattan and related markets such as Jersey City and Hoboken, he said.

The situation is exacerbated by Manhattan’s falling prices, which are drawing demand away from its secondary markets as more buyers find they can afford the city again.

The slowdown has forced sellers in Hudson to drop their prices.

In the past two months, sellers of 16 percent of Hudson County’s listings have cut their prices by an average of 8.7 percent, according to StreetEasy.com’s data.

In Hoboken, prices have dropped on 43 percent of the listings during the time the properties have been on the market; in Jersey City, that is true for 34 percent of the listings, Gross said.

The homes that are selling tend to be in the lower price ranges, around $350,000, said Hoboken broker Norma De Ruggiero.

“Three years ago you couldn’t buy anything for $350,000,” she said. “It just wasn’t there.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 118 Comments

“You can sort of feel the local economy on the edge of a cliff.”

From the Wall Street Journal:

New York, Boston Prices Expected to Fall Further
By JUSTIN LAHART and CONOR DOUGHERTY
DECEMBER 31, 2008

Although New York has been at the epicenter of the financial crisis, housing prices in the city haven’t dropped nearly as fast as cities elsewhere. The same is true of the financial hubs of Boston and Charlotte, N.C.

But that doesn’t mean these cities are skirting the worst of the housing bust. Rather, markets where price declines have been slightest may be in worse shape, because prices still have further to fall before enough buyers step in to bring housing activity to normal. Meanwhile, heavy foreclosure activity in hard-hit areas like Phoenix, Las Vegas and San Diego are bringing prices into equilibrium. Those cities may be closer to a turnaround.

In October, single-family-home prices in the New York metropolitan area were down 12% from the all-time high they reached in 2006, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home-price indexes. That is roughly half the decline registered by the 20-city index and well short of Phoenix’s 41% drop. A separate index of New York-area condo prices was down just 4% from its peak.

Part of the reason New York housing prices have held up is that lot of New Yorkers are holding on to their homes rather than selling for less than the Joneses got last year. Esty Lobovits, a 31-year-old lawyer in Manhattan, has been looking to buy an apartment since the summer but says she isn’t willing to pay what she considers to be inflated prices. Many apartments she has viewed are empty or filled only with staged furniture, and brokers are more aggressive, sometimes following up with her broker even if Ms. Lobovits hasn’t placed a bid.

In the language of Wall Street, with asking prices not dropping to levels where bidders like Ms. Lobovits will pick them, the market isn’t “clearing.” The Federal Reserve Bank of New York noted in its “beige book” survey of regional conditions this month that many would-be buyers have opted to rent out their apartments rather than sell, driving rental prices lower — particularly in higher-end buildings.

While New York is probably an extreme example, its inertia is being repeated in many of the other housing markets that have yet to see sharp declines. Some owners with hefty mortgages can’t face selling their house for less than they owe, but also, many don’t want to sell at a steep discount to what a house down the street might have fetched two years ago.

New York’s slower adjustment is a more typical housing-market decline, with a deteriorating economy grinding down values over time. The last time prices in the area fell, starting in 1988, it took three years before they hit their trough, at 15% lower.

This time, the price decline may be far more severe. While subprime mortgages didn’t play as big a direct role in the New York real-estate market as elsewhere, there were plenty of Wall Streeters who made their living off of packaging those loans into the complex securities and trading them. Even last year, with the housing market fraying, Wall Street pulled in record bonuses.

“Right now, people are still living on last year’s bonus,” says Barclays Capital economist Ethan Harris, who is based in New York. “You can sort of feel the local economy on the edge of a cliff.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 212 Comments

New Jersey Home Price Tracker

NJ Home Price Tracker has been updated with S&P Case Shiller October HPI Data:


(click to enlarge)

Or in spreadsheet format for those who prefer:

NJ Home Price Tracker (XLS)

For those looking for volume measurements, the most recent version of the “Sales vs. Inventory” and overall sales graphs for Northern NJ (GSMLS):


(click to enlarge)


(click to enlarge)

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 114 Comments

S&P Case Shiller October Home Price Index

From the AP:

Home prices post 18 percent annual drop in October

A closely watched index shows home prices dropped by the sharpest annual rate on record in October.

The Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller 20-city housing index released Tuesday fell by a record 18 percent from October last year, the largest drop since its inception in 2000. The 10-city index tumbled 19.1 percent, its biggest decline in its 21-year history.

Both indices have recorded year-over-year declines for 22 straight months. Prices are at levels not seen since March 2004.

Prices in the 20-city index have plummeted more than 23.4 percent from their peak in July 2006. The 10-city index has fallen 25 percent since its peak in June 2006.

None of the 20 cities saw annual price gains in October — for the seventh consecutive month.

From Bloomberg:

October Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Fall 18% From Year Ago

Home prices in 20 U.S. cities declined at the fastest rate on record, depressed by mounting foreclosures and slumping sales.

The S&P/Case-Shiller index declined 18 percent in the 12 months to October, more than forecast, after dropping 17.4 percent in September. The gauge has fallen every month since January 2007, and year-over-year records began in 2001.

The financial market meltdown that’s reverberated around the globe has prompted banks to curb lending, signaling the housing slump will persist for a fourth year in 2009. Falling property values have eroded household wealth, causing consumers to pare spending and deepening what is projected to be the longest recession in the postwar period.

“As 2008 comes to an end, the housing market is left in a weaker state than at the beginning of the year,” Michelle Meyer, an economist at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York, said before the report. “Uncertainty remains high given the unprecedented nature of the recession.”

Economists forecast the 20-city index would fall 17.9 percent from a year earlier, according to the median of 21 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey. Projections ranged from declines of 17 percent to 18.4 percent.

Compared with a year earlier, all areas in the 20-city survey showed a decrease in prices in October, led by a 33 percent drop in Phoenix and a 32 percent decline in Las Vegas.

“The bear market continues,” David Blitzer, chairman of the index committee at S&P, said in a statement. The declines in Atlanta, Seattle and Portland surpassed 10 percent for the first time, he said.

From MarketWatch:

Home prices off record 18% in past year, Case-Shiller says

Home prices in 20 major U.S. cities dropped 2.2% in October from the prior month and had fallen a record 18% from the previous year, according to the Case-Shiller price index published Tuesday by Standard & Poor’s.

Prices have fallen in all 20 cities compared with both the prior month and October 2007, and 14 of the 20 metro areas showed record rates of annual declines. Also, 14 of 20 areas sustianed declines of more than 10% on a year-over-year basis.

For Case-Shiller’s original 10-city index, prices fell a record 19.1% in the previous 12 months.

“The bear market continues; home prices are back to their March 2004 levels,” said David Blitzer, chairman of the index committee at Standard & Poor’s.

The largest price drop for October was seen in Detroit, with a fall of 4.5% amid growing troubles for the Big Three automakers.
For the year, Phoenix chalked up the biggest drop — 32.7%.

From the Wall Street Journal:

Case-Shiller Index Shows Sharpest Home-Price Declines in Sun Belt

Home prices continued to drop as the economic downturn deepened further in October, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home-price indexes, a closely watched gauge of U.S. home prices, with home prices in the Sun Belt continuing to be hit hardest.

“The bear market continues; home prices are back to their March 2004 levels,” said David M. Blitzer, chairman of S&P’s index committee. He added that both composite indexes and 14 of the 20 metropolitan areas are reporting new record declines. As of October, the 10-city index is down 25% from its mid-2006 peak and the 20-city is down 23%, Mr. Blitzer said.

The indexes showed prices in 10 major metropolitan areas fell 19% in October from a year earlier and 3.6% from September. The drop marks the 10-city index’s 13th straight monthly report of a record decline.

In 20 major metropolitan areas, home prices dropped 18% from the prior year, also a record, and 2.2% from September.

Once again, none of the regions was able to stave off a decline from September to October.

Overview:

S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices Overview

Data:

S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices Data

Posted in Economics, National Real Estate, New Development, Risky Lending | 275 Comments

“It’s about as bad as we’ve seen in several decades”

From the Daily Record:

Economic woes loom large as N.J. closes ’08

It’s a bad sign when mild-mannered nonpartisan legislative analysts start measuring the depth of the state’s budget problems by how many decades back you have to look to find similar distress.

The answer, by the way, is three or four.

Then again, Gov. Jon S. Corzine says the economy is in “without doubt, the most serious recession” since the 1930s. That has created a big deficit in the current state budget and a massive one in the plan that must be adopted by the end of June.

Not to mention a throbbing political headache for Corzine and his Democratic colleagues in the Assembly in an election year that could test whether the voters’ recent interest in change goes in both political directions or applies to cuts in popular programs such as rebates.

“We have an economic emergency. … There is a real problem out among the people of this state and across the country with regard to economic conditions. And they’re not getting better,” Corzine said.

“Everyone has to adjust their thinking to the circumstances of the moment,” he said.

The unemployment fund is nearly broke. The transportation fund lacks long-term funding, as does the open-space fund. New Jersey’s income tax relies heavily on the year-end bonuses Wall Street has slashed. Car sales are down more than 40 percent, a direct hit on a big sales-tax driver. Businesses are losing money. New Jersey is down 34,400 jobs in 2008.

“It’s about as bad as we’ve seen in several decades,” said Sen. Barbara Buono, D-Middlesex, the budget committee chairwoman. “Unemployment, foreclosure, bankruptcy — government is not immune to the fallout. Tax revenues support our budget.”

Corzine might look to save money by freezing employee wages or forcing workers to take unpaid furloughs — if unions agree to such moves. Layoffs are also possible, although the governor said he wants to avoid that.

“I’d prefer to save jobs, but that means I need cooperation, because under the contract the only one of those you can execute independently are layoffs,” Corzine said. “I’d rather see people on payrolls with health insurance rather than accentuating a problem, but that may not be possible.”

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 309 Comments

History Rhymes: Gold Coast Loses Its Glitter

I came across “Housing Inventories on the Rise” this morning and thought it sounded a bit familiar. Sure enough, the same story was published in the New York Times nearly 18 years ago, when the last real estate bubble burst. The scenarios are a little different, but while history doesn’t always repeat, it sure does rhyme. Real estate bubbles aren’t fairy tales, and home prices can fall, even in Hoboken. There is a reason these things take 20 years to repeat, because that is about the time it takes for the collective wisdom to forget about the last bubble. You know, doomed to repeat it and all.

From the New York Times:
Jersey’s ‘Gold Coast’ Losing Its Glitter
By THOMAS J. LUECK
Published: March 24, 1991 <--- Look at the date

THE New Jersey shore of the Hudson River, which emerged in the mid-80’s as a powerful new magnet for high-rise office development, is struggling with high vacancy rates, canceled projects and nagging doubts about the capacity of its roads, parking and public transportation.

No area better symbolized the 80’s real estate boom in the New York region. An 18-mile corridor of gritty piers, derelict warehouses and abandoned railroad yards, the New Jersey riverfront became a patchwork of huge development sites.

It also became the focus of a feisty battle for New York City tenants and the centerpiece of an urban renaissance so sweeping that some began calling the area the “Gold Coast” of New Jersey.

For now, the renaissance has slowed. With 15 million square feet of space — more than half of it built in the last five years — developers on the New Jersey shore are beset by the highest vacancy rates in the New York area.

“When the Manhattan market became soft, it really hurt the New Jersey waterfront,” said Peter Eppie, managing director of Edward S. Gordon Company of New Jersey, a commercial brokerage, based in Jersey City. In an analysis this month, it found office vacancies in New Jersey’s Hudson River cities running at more than 30 percent, nearly double those in Manhattan.

For home builders and office developers alike, the immediate problem is something far from unique to the Hudson riverfront — the economics of a deep real estate recession. Since most of the office developers in the area have designed their buildings to appeal to banks, securities firms and other financial-services companies in Manhattan, they are now trying to sell to companies that are eliminating workers and shedding office space.

Some proposed developments are being stalled by public opposition. In Hoboken, an on-again, off-again plan to develop idle riverfront land and piers that are owned by the city and leased to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey was sent back to the drawing boards in October. The plan, involving a huge development of 1.3 million square feet of offices, hundreds of condominiums, a hotel and a marina, was defeated by only four votes in a municipal referendum. Now, Hoboken and Port Authority officials say they are preparing a plan for a smaller development.

From the New York Times:
Housing Inventories on the Rise
By ANTOINETTE MARTIN
Published: December 26, 2008

ON the eve of a new year, it is becoming clear that the real estate market in Hudson County, the “Gold Coast” zone just across the river from Manhattan, will have to wait at least two years to celebrate a more prosperous era.

Once New Jersey’s hottest market for high-end condominiums — drawing streams of Manhattanites — Hudson now finds itself with 24.1 months’ worth of unsold inventory.

This is a much bigger backlog than exists in Brooklyn, which has a 13.8-month supply, and it exceeds unsold inventory levels in Queens; in Orange, Rockland and Westchester counties in New York; and in Fairfield County in Connecticut.

On Long Island, the unsold inventory is also swollen. It would take 20.9 months for all the houses and condos currently on the market there to find buyers, given the current pace of sales.

A new assessment of the region prepared by the Otteau Valuation Group presents a generally unlovely picture of residential sales markets:

Manhattan now has an 11.8-month supply of unsold inventory, said Jeffrey G. Otteau, whose Old Bridge, N.J., company analyzes contract sales figures and advises real estate brokers. “This is not terribly big,” he said, “but it is significantly bigger than a year ago — and much bigger than the days when multiple bidders were circling around every available unit on the market.”

In Hudson County, home to Hoboken and Jersey City — an area known as “Wall Street West” — sales were 26 percent fewer in November than the month before, and 47 percent fewer than in November 2007.

Looking further ahead, Mr. Otteau has recently raised the issue of potential overbuilding in Hudson County — in addition to his contention that outer-ring suburbs already have a surfeit of single-family housing on large lots that will not appeal to buyers of the next decade.

One large developer in Hoboken, the Applied Development Company, stopped building anything other than rentals as of nearly two years ago, said its president, David Barry. “We saw the condo market getting ahead of itself, and becoming temporarily overbuilt, for sure,” he said.

Posted in Housing Bubble, New Development, New Jersey Real Estate | 213 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion

This is the time and place to post observations about your local areas, comments on news stories or the New Jersey housing market, open house reports, etc. If you have any questions you wanted to ask earlier in the week but never posted them up, let’s have them. Also a good place to post suggestions, requests for information, criticism, and praise.

For readers that have never commented, there is a link at the top of each message that is typically labelled “[#] Comments“. Go ahead and give that a click, you might be missing out on a world of information you didn’t know about. While you are there, introduce yourselves to everyone.

For new readers that have only read the messages displayed on the main page, take a look through the archives, a substantial amount of information has been put online in the past year. The archives can be accessed by using the links found in the menus on the right hand side of the page.

Posted in General | 288 Comments

BusinessWeek: 2009 Real Estate Forecast

From BusinessWeek:

2009 Real Estate Forecast: Troubles Spread
Wealthier neighborhoods that avoided subprime borrowing will be hurt in the new year as the downturn weakens even healthy markets

2008 was the year that subprime borrowers and speculators got hurt by the real estate crisis. 2009 could be when everyone else gets hit.

Until now, the nation’s most serious home price declines have been in low-cost markets that were dominated by subprime mortgages, and in overbuilt markets such as Florida, California, and Las Vegas, where residential values are sliding fast toward pre-housing boom levels.

That’s because the big story in 2009 could be that, with the deepening recession and mounting job losses, serious housing troubles could infect wealthier communities and markets that were just beginning to stabilize this summer before the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on Sept. 15 sparked the most serious financial turmoil in decades. In fact, according to online real estate research firm HousingPredictor.com, based in Destin, Fla., housing prices nationwide will fall 12.5% next year, compared with an estimated 11.1% this year.

Housing and mortgage problems pushed the nation into a recession that could now amplify, draw out, and expand the reach of the housing declines.

Take Manhattan, for example, where condo and co-op prices soared years after housing bubbles in most other major cities popped. New York City’s real estate market was bolstered by residents who were still earning sky-high Wall Street bonuses and by a weak dollar that attracted overseas bargain hunters.

Now that the dollar has strengthened, the economic woes have spread to potential New York home buyers across the globe, and thousands of New York financial professionals are collecting severance. Manhattan apartment prices, as a result, have dropped as much as 20% since the summer, said Jonathan Miller, president and chief executive officer of real estate appraisal firm Miller Samuel. Miller’s analysis is based on contracts signed in recent months, rather than actual closings.

“Mid-september was a milestone,” Miller said. “That’s where you saw a pronounced slowdown in transaction volume.”

HousingPredictor.com is projecting a 19.4% decline in Manhattan home prices in 2009. And Moody’s Economy.com is predicting that condo prices in New York City, Northern New Jersey, and Westchester County will fall 29% by the fourth quarter of next year.

“Nationally, we think this recession is going to be worse than anything we’ve seen in 40 years,” said Marisa DiNatale, senior economist for Moody’s Economy.com. “If the economy gets that bad, then you will start to see foreclosures in Manhattan as well.”

Few areas across the country will likely escape the recession and the corresponding impact on the real estate market, housing experts say. Another wave of foreclosures could be triggered next year as a flood of Alt-A and option adjustable-rate mortgages, which were given to people with decent credit, begin to recast.

“We’re in the middle of the game here,” said Joseph Seneca, professor of economics at Rutgers University in New Jersey. “There’s significant further unwinding to come…. We’re in a downward spiral with job losses that is reinforcing the weakness in the consumer markets, particularly in the largest investment the consumer makes, in his home.”

Posted in Economics, National Real Estate | 211 Comments

November New and Existing Home Sales

From the AP:

Existing home sales sink by 8.6 percent in November, as prices plunge a record 13.2 percent

A real estate group says sales of existing homes plummeted far more than expected last month as buyers reeled from October’s big plunge on Wall Street. The median sales price fell by the largest amount on record.

The National Association of Realtors said Tuesday that sales of existing homes fell 8.6 percent to an annual rate of 4.49 million in November, from a downwardly revised pace of 4.91 million in October.

Sales had been expected to fall to a pace of 4.9 million units. according to Thomson Reuters.

The median sales price plunged 13.2 percent in November to $181,300, from $208,000 a year ago. That was the lowest price since February 2004 and the biggest year-over-year drop on records going back to 1968.

From Bloomberg:

U.S. Existing Home Sales Fall 8.6% in November to 4.49 Mln Rate

Sales of previously owned homes in the U.S. fell more than forecast in November and prices dropped by the most on record, indicating the real estate slump will extend into a fourth year and worsen the recession.

Purchases declined 8.6 percent to an annual rate of 4.49 million, from a 4.91 million rate in October that was less than previously estimated, the National Association of Realtors said today in Washington. The median price dropped 13.2 percent from a year earlier, the biggest decline since records started in 1968. Separately, the Commerce Department reported today that new-home sales fell 2.9 percent last month.

Prices will plunge further as job losses sap demand, foreclosures add to the property glut and prospective buyers get turned away by mortgage lenders. The Federal Reserve this month cut its benchmark interest rate target to as low as zero and said it would take more steps to ease borrowing as the longest postwar recession looms.

“Foreclosures are prolonging the declines in home prices,” Jonathan Basile, an economist at Credit Suisse Holdings in New York, said before the report. “Increasing unemployment is a continued impediment to housing.”

Resales were forecast to fall to a 4.93 million annual rate from an originally reported 4.98 million in October, according to the median estimate of 63 economists in a Bloomberg News survey. Projections ranged from 3.98 million to 5.2 million.

Sales dropped 10.6 percent compared with a year earlier. Resales averaged 5.67 million in 2007 and before today’s report, fluctuated around a 4.96 million rate this year.

The number of previously-owned unsold homes on the market at the end of November represented 11.2 months’ worth at the current sales pace, up from 10.3 months’ at the end of the prior month.

The median price of an existing home fell to $181,300, and the percentage drop from a year ago was “probably the largest price decline since the Great Depression,” although records don’t go back that far, said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun.

Foreclosures and short sales accounted for 45 percent of last month’s home purchases, Yun said.

From MarketWatch:

U.S. Nov. existing home sales fall 8.6% to 4.49 mln units

With plummeting prices, resales of U.S. single-family homes and condos dropped 8.6% in November to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.49 million, the National Association of Realtors reported Tuesday. Resales are down 10.6% in the past year. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch had expected sales to fall to an annual rate of 4.9 million. In the past year the median sales price fell 13.2% — the largest decline since data collection began in 1968 and likely since the Great Depression — to $181,300. The inventory of unsold homes on the market rose 0.1% to 4.2 million, an 11.2 month supply at the current sales pace. NAR attributed November’s poor results to the weak stock market, job losses and low consumer confidence.

From MarketWatch:

U.S Nov. new home sales down 2.9% to 407,000

U.S. new home sales fell to their lowest level in over 17 years in November, the Commerce Department estimated Tuesday. New home sales fell 2.9% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 407,000. This is the lowest level since 401,000 in January 1991. New home sales are 35.3% below their level in November 2007. The drop was slightly above the 400,000 pace expected by economists surveyed by MarketWatch. New-home sales in October were revised to a 419,000 level compared with the previous estimate of 433,000. The months’ supply of homes on the market fell slightly to 11.5 months in November from 11.8 months in October. Median sales prices have fallen 11.5% in the past year to $220,400.

From Reuters:

November home sales fall 2.9 percent

ales of newly built single-family homes slowed in November to the weakest levels since 1991, according to Commerce Department data on Tuesday that offered fresh evidence of housing market distress.

The seasonally adjusted annual sales pace of 407,000 was down 2.9 percent from October and was the lowest rate since January, 1991.

Economists polled by Reuters had forecast sales would notch a 420,000 rate compared with a downwardly revised 419,000 in October, previously reported as 433,000.

The median sales price rose to $220,400 from $214,600 in October. The median marks the half-way point, with half of all houses sold above that level and half below.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate, New Development, New Jersey Real Estate, Risky Lending | 343 Comments

Predictions 2009!

OK pompous prognosticators, dust off those crystal balls and lets hear ’em!

Ground Rules
Predictions provided should either be for June 30th, 2009 or December 31th, 2009, please specify.

Provide justification for your forecast, where applicable (unless you are just making it up, if so, state that).

You may provide any caveats and/or assumptions that your forecast is based on.

You need not provide a forecast for all categories below.

Where applicable, forecasts are judged against the surveys/reports listed.

Real Estate
National Existing Home Sales – NAR
Median Existing Home Price – NAR
Median Existing Home Price – S&P Case Shiller HPI
Median Existing Home Price – OFHEO HPI

New Jersey Existing Home Sales – NAR/NJAR
Median Existing Home Price – NAR/NJAR
Median Existing Home Price – S&P Case Shiller HPI
Median Existing Home Price – OFHEO HPI

National New Home Sales – NAHB
Median New Home Price – NAHB

Commodities
Oil
Gold

Equities
United States
International Developed Markets
Emerging Markets

Mortgage Financing
30-Year Fixed – Freddie Mac PMMS
15-Year Fixed – Freddie Mac PMMS
5/1-Year ARM – Freddie Mac PMMS

Macroeconomic
10y Treasury
Fed Funds Rate
National Unemployment Rate
New Jersey Unemployment Rate

Oddball
Anything else you’d like to make a prediction about.

Posted in Economics | 315 Comments