Housing debacle sets the stage for recession

From the Wall Street Journal:

U.S. Warning Signs Point Toward a Deep Recession
Housing Crunch,
Squeeze on Consumers
Exceed Earlier Slumps
By JUSTIN LAHART
January 21, 2008

The U.S. has suffered recessions only twice in the past quarter century and both were short and mild. There are good reasons to fear that the looming recession, if it arrives, could be worse.

Housing is in the midst of its worst downturn since at least the 1970s. That has led to a meltdown in the mortgage market; with financial firms struggling to make sense of their losses, they are making it harder for even credit-worthy borrowers to get loans. The combination of heavy debt loads, still-high energy and food prices and a weakening job market has households tightening their belts. Consumer spending, long a bulwark of the economy, is faltering.

That sets the stage for something more severe than the 2001 recession, which spanned just eight months, says Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg. During that slump, in which gross domestic product declined a slight 0.4%, quarterly consumer spending slowed but never contracted — the first time that happened during a recession since the 1940s.

The eight-month recession that ended in early 1991, when a housing downturn and credit problems sapped the economy, is a better guide. From its peak to its trough, GDP shrank 1.3%, and consumer spending slipped.

Today’s housing debacle is even worse, says Mr. Rosenberg, and the financial crisis it has precipitated is far more severe.

University of Maryland economist Carmen Reinhart and Harvard University economist Kenneth Rogoff agree. They say the current crisis appears on track to be at least as bad as the five most catastrophic financial crises to hit industrialized countries since World War II.

If those past experiences are any guide, the economy is in trouble, they argue in a recent paper. Indeed, “if the United States does not experience a significant and protracted growth slowdown, it should either be considered very lucky or even more ‘special’ than most optimistic theories suggest,” they write.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 386 Comments

Prices falling, but not falling.

From Newsday:

Seller incentives attractive in buyer’s market

Homeowners eager to sell in a buyer’s market have found a new angle, offering to sellers incentives such as cash to help defray the cost of the closing or even to pay for a new roof or driveway.

The givebacks, which are legal if disclosed to lenders, have become so common that the multiple listing service where real estate agents list and track home sales data now includes an entry line for seller concessions. In the last four months of 2007, for example, 35 of 191 homes that sold in West Hartford had seller concessions.

“It’s very common, especially among first-time home buyers and any buyer who doesn’t have a lot of cash in hand,” said Tom Abbate, an agent at William Raveis Real Estate. “Buyers like to walk away from a closing and still have cash in their pocket.”

A Middletown agent, for example, estimated that half of all his home sales have some sort of seller incentive that does not show up in the final sales price.

The benefits are obvious for buyers who are struggling to come up with enough money for a down payment, closing costs and home renovations. Buyers can take out a slightly larger mortgage, based on the recorded sale price, and move into their new house with more money.

However, the inducements make it harder to calculate the real selling price of homes and determine if prices are declining in a soft market, and by how much.

For example, a three-bedroom ranch-style house in Bristol sold for 193,000 and the sellers gave the buyer $5,000 at closing. The purchase price was recorded as $193,000, but the true sales price after the cash transaction was $188,000.

The result is that home sale prices are propped up artificially, running counter to what typically happens in a housing slowdown.

“It’s a big deal because prices are, in fact, falling,” said Ron Van Winkle, a West Hartford economist and town official. “We know they are falling, but that is not reflected in the numbers we see.”

Posted in National Real Estate | 3 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion – Part III

Now Open, Part III!

Prior weekend thread closed due to comment overflow.

Posted in General | 136 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion – Part II

Now Open, Part II!

Prior weekend thread closed due to comment overflow.

Posted in General | 396 Comments

Weekend Open Discussion

————————————————————–
Save the Date!
We’ll be meeting up on Saturday, February 9th in Morristown NJ.
————————————————————–

This is the time and place to post observations about your local areas, comments on news stories or the New Jersey housing market, open house reports, etc. If you have any questions you wanted to ask earlier in the week but never posted them up, let’s have them. Also a good place to post suggestions, requests for information, criticism, and praise.

For readers that have never commented, there is a link at the top of each message that is typically labelled “[#] Comments“. Go ahead and give that a click, you might be missing out on a world of information you didn’t know about. While you are there, introduce yourselves to everyone.

For new readers that have only read the messages displayed on the main page, take a look through the archives, a substantial amount of information has been put online in the past year. The archives can be accessed by using the links found in the menus on the right hand side of the page.

Posted in General | 389 Comments

Comp Killer

114 Boulevard, Pequannock NJ

Purchased: 10/25/2005
Purchase Price: $615,000

MLS# 2426227
Sold: 1/16/2008
Sale Price: $550,000 (11% Loss)

26 Schmidt Circle, Watchung NJ

Purchased: 1/8/2007
Purchase Price: $659,900

MLS# 2417672
Sold: 1/17/2008
Sale Price: $450,000 (32% Loss)

163 County Road, Demarest NJ

Purchased: 6/18/2005
Purchase Price: $685,000

MLS# 2731929
Sold: 1/16/2008
Sale Price: $633,000 (8% Loss)

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate | 24 Comments

Foreclosure crisis hits home

Jayne and I were both home from work earlier than usual yesterday. We decided to take advantage of the little light left in the day and take the dog to the park. We packed up as usual and off we went, a normal day. We walked up the block, and rounded the corner towards the park, and were about half way through the 2 minute walk to get there. We walked passed a two family house with a large pile of cardboard boxes out front. I noticed these the other day too, odd since we were nowhere near “recycling day”. The neighbors were obviously upset about this, since there was a nastygram from someone on the pile of boxes, and a sticker from the trash pickup about when recycling came around.

I muttered something to my wife about the “neighborhood going to hell”, and got a dirty look in return. About this time I noticed a yellow form taped up on the door, at first I thought it might have been a notice from the police about the trash. I couldn’t help myself, I had to go see. So I walked over, and couldn’t believe what I saw.

I’m not sure why it came as such a shock to me, I look at these things all day long. I’ve sat through Sheriff Sales on a number of occasions, and while they aren’t particularly uplifting, they usually aren’t ever shocking

Jayne, wanting nothing to do with my nosiness, was down the block already. I called for her to come back and take a look, she did. She managed to get out an “Oh my god”, and looked pretty shocked herself.

Was it just that I didn’t expect it? I did. Maybe I just didn’t expect it to hit someone so close to home?

Posted in Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 394 Comments

“But the market died.”

From BusinessWeek:

The Home Equity Crisis Ahead

Subprime mortgages have taken a lot of blame for banks’ big losses. But there’s another problem lurking behind the mess: home-equity lending.

Buoyed by rising prices, borrowers increasingly tapped into the equity on their properties to finance a new car, renovations, or even a down payment, making equity a key source of consumers’ strength. But with the housing market in disarray and prices plunging, the business of home-equity lending is souring. At least $14.7 billion in loans and lines of credit were already delinquent through the end of September—the highest level in a decade. “After subprime, home-equity lending is the biggest problem the industry has right now,” says analyst Frederick Cannon of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods.

What’s more, there’s little that can be done to prevent the pain from the deterioration of this $850 billion market. A lender on a mortgage has the first claim on the underlying property. In the case of foreclosure, it can sell the property and recoup some money. The bank with the home-equity piece has no such collateral and is usually out the money. “The home-equity lender is going to get hosed,” says Amy Crews Cutts, deputy chief economist at mortgage giant Freddie Mac (FRE).

JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Washington Mutual (WM), IndyMac (IMB), Countrywide Financial, and others are getting hit. On Jan. 16, JPMorgan announced it set aside an additional $395 million for troubled home-equity products in the last quarter, compared with just $125 million for subprime mortgages. Washington Mutual reported in the latest period that its bad home-equity loans and lines of credit surged by 130% from the end of 2006, forcing the bank to up losses by $967 million. Even lenders of a conservative bent, those that managed to sidestep much of the subprime mess, are getting hammered: Wells Fargo (WFC) took a recent $1.4 billion writedown, largely from home-equity lending.

The boom brought about some especially toxic home-equity loans. Homeowners gamed the system, steadily cashing out every bit of equity from their houses—a situation that arose in part because banks didn’t track whether borrowers took out subsequent loans from competitors. Another bad practice: a home-equity loan on top of a payment-option adjustable-rate mortgage. Those ARMs allow borrowers to make monthly payments that amount to less than the interest. The principal keeps growing, eroding the equity, which makes it a risky home-equity loan on top of an already risky mortgage.

In a rapidly rising housing market, such practices didn’t seem particularly reckless. After all, homeowners could quickly refinance, using newly accumulated equity to pay off a second loan, or even a third. So lenders were confident they would get their money back. “The proposition was that borrowers would refinance and pay this sucker off in six months or a year,” says Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance. “But the market died.”

Posted in National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 2 Comments

Underwriting “back in vogue”

From the Wall Street Journal:

Prime Time: The New Boom In Refinancing
By JEFF D. OPDYKE
January 17, 2008; Page D1

Another mortgage-refinancing boom is under way. But this time around, many homeowners will be watching from the sidelines.

For the first time since 2005, mortgage rates have slipped well below 6%, ending last week at about 5.87%, according to mortgage tracker HSH Associates. Some lenders are offering even lower deals. At these levels, about 37% of homeowners could refinance their mortgages and save money on their monthly payment, estimates investment bank Bear Stearns Cos. As rates drop further — and some expect that to happen if the economy continues to weaken — increasing numbers of consumers will find refinancing their existing mortgage worthwhile.

But here’s the catch, and it’s a big one: Many homeowners won’t benefit, either because their mortgage is too big or their credit score is too low. In other cases, falling home prices will make it tough for them to refinance.

As the subprime-lending crisis continues to roil the housing and financial markets, rates for so-called jumbo mortgages — those above $417,000 — are now uncharacteristically priced so far above conventional mortgages that refinancing generally makes no sense for homeowners who hold them. At the same time, conventional borrowers who have lower credit scores — or relatively little equity in their houses — are finding that they generally don’t qualify for the best rates, often negating any expected benefits to the pocketbook.

The result: The big winners will be conventional borrowers with so-called conforming loans — those eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-sponsored entities that rule the mortgage market. In particular, borrowers with high credit scores or a large amount of equity already in their home, or some combination of both, stand to benefit, says Dale Westhoff, who heads Bear Stearns’s mortgage research. In the past, when rates have dived below 6%, “you’d normally see subprime and Alt-A and jumbo borrowers” in the market, Mr. Westhoff says. “But they’re really not going to be participants in this refi wave.”

Ron Hermance is more blunt. The chairman and CEO of New Jersey’s Hudson City Bancorp Inc. says many consumers “will be left out in the cold this time because underwriting is back in vogue,” and many homeowners will find that during the previous housing boom “they originally got credit they weren’t entitled to.” In the first two weeks of this year, refinancings accounted for 56% of Hudson City’s mortgage volume, compared with 42% for all of last year.

For jumbo borrowers, though, higher standards aren’t the biggest problem: Rates on those loans averaged 6.8% at the end of last week, according to HSH, meaning the spread between conventional and jumbo rates is nearly a full percentage point — four times the typical gap.

Jumbo rates, lenders say, aren’t coming down alongside conventional rates because buyers of those mortgages in the secondary market remain skittish. As such, today’s jumbo rates are well above the existing rates many homeowners currently have on their mortgage, meaning “there’s no reason to refinance,” says Jay Steren, CEO at Mortgage Capital Associates, a Los Angeles mortgage banker.

In the conventional-mortgage market, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are moving to risk-based pricing, which has the effect of tightening lending standards across the country. The upshot: Homeowners with weak credit scores or little equity in their home will pay for the risk associated with underwriting their mortgage through higher interest rates and added fees — which has the effect of dimming, if not eliminating, the benefits of refinancing.

To get the best rates under the new risk-based guidelines, homeowners “need a credit score over 679, or equity of greater than 30%,” says Sanborn Mortgages’ Mr. Menatian. But as home prices fall in many markets, homeowners’ equity sinks alongside it — making it tough to get more-attractive rates.

The risk-based guidelines impose so-called delivery fees that range between 0.75% and 2% of the mortgage value for consumers with credit scores below 680. The highest fees are charged to those with credit scores below 620.

Mr. Menatian says buyers with credit scores in the 620 to 639 range, and who have less than 30% equity, are getting mortgage rates these days of about 6.375%, while the best borrowers are getting 5.75%.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 18 Comments

“There is a section of the population here that over-extended themselves to buy”

From Reuters:

Wealthy may be next in line in U.S. home crisis

A house in this wealthy Chicago suburb is far beyond the reach of most Americans.

Unfortunately, Hinsdale may also now be too expensive for some of the people who already live here.

“There is a section of the population here that over-extended themselves to buy here and then keep up the facade of wealth,” said Sharon Sodikoff, a broker associate at local real estate agency Prudential Homelife Realty. “In the next year or so they’ll be forced out in dribs and drabs.”

“The next wave of problems will come from prime borrowers who bought too much house or borrowed too much against it,” said Michael van Zalingen, director of home ownership services at Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago. A “prime” borrower is one with good credit.

Real estate agents warn that some high-income borrowers have already been forced to sell or leave their homes and more will follow. Especially those who used their homes as ATMs, withdrawing cash via home equity loans.

“For those who utilized home equity loans for five to ten years to finance their lifestyle, the chickens are coming home to roost,” said Chicago-based real estate agent Marki Lemons.

“The concern is people who have borrowed a large percentage of the equity (in their homes),” Kelly said. “Now the value of their homes is falling and they can’t refinance.”

“Some just stop paying and walk away,” he added.

“I’ve seen people who bought less than a year ago and have no equity in their homes simply walking away with no regard for the consequences,” said Genie Birch, a real estate agent at Chicago-based Koenig & Strey GMAC who covers the city’s wealthier districts.

Real estate agents say speculative investors who bought to make a profit are also walking away as the rents they charge fall behind the mortgage payments as their adjustable-rate mortgages readjust.

The home owners who find it harder to walk away are those who took out large home equity loans before prices started falling and now owe far more than their home is worth.

“It’s difficult for home owners in that situation to sell as they’ll still be left owing money,” said Dave Hanna, managing partner of Prudential Preferred CRE, which owns Prudential Homelife Realty in Hindsale.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 26 Comments

Sound familiar?

From Bloomberg:

Recession Theorists Confront Recession Reality: Caroline Baum

The calendar flipped from 2007 to 2008, and just like that, the talk turned from if to when, how long and how deep.

Recession, that is. Will it be short and severe, long and shallow, or some combination of the two (short and shallow, long and severe)? Will the slump have a V- or a U-shaped bottom? Will the end of the expansion turn out to be December, January or some future month, once the committee entrusted with determining such things assigns a date?

While all business cycles share certain characteristics, they have features unique unto themselves. For example, every postwar recession experienced an outright decline in real consumer spending in at least one quarter — except 2001’s, where the increase in consumer spending never fell below 1 percent.

Then there’s residential real estate, which, along with manufacturing, is the most interest-rate sensitive sector of the economy. Housing usually rolls over well before the economy; it leads us into the Promised Land of recovery as well.

Real residential investment barely missed a beat in the 2001 recession as low interest rates and lax lending standards conspired to provide a home of one’s own for anyone who set foot in a mortgage lender’s office. Small declines in the second and third quarters of 2000 and fourth quarter of 2001 show up as a blip on a graph compared with the more typical swan dive seen in previous cycles and at present.

Most recessions are consumer driven, which makes sense since the consumer accounts for more than 70 percent of total spending. The 2001 slump, on the other hand, was driven by a sharp cutback in investment in equipment and software following a technology bubble, with too much money allocated to too much fiber-optic cable for which there was no possible use.

So what will the 2008 recession look like? Driven by home- loan defaults, falling home prices and cascading credit problems at financial institutions that have the potential to curtail lending to the rest of the economy, the recession may look something like the one in 1990-1991, which came on the heels of the savings and loan crisis.

It was commercial, not residential, real estate that was the villain back then, with banks and thrifts overextending themselves into areas they knew little about.

“Excess real estate lending, powered by rapidly rising rents and prices, rapidly occurred worldwide,” said William Seidman, former chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Resolution Trust Corp., the agency created to clean up the mess, at a 1997 symposium on the history of the ’80s. “But more that anything else, real estate lending became the fashion, the new banking idea of the times.”

Sound familiar? The new banking idea of the current times — investing in structured financial vehicles collateralized with pools of subprime loans — is sending the biggest financial institutions overseas in search of additional capital. Yesterday, Citigroup Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. reported getting a combined $21 billion from investors, including the governments of Singapore and Kuwait.

The good news is, the 1990-1991 recession was short (eight months) and shallow, featuring a peak-to-trough decline in real GDP of 1.3 percent.

The bad news is, it took a long time for real estate, both commercial and residential, to recover, damping job growth through 1992. Some regions of the country remained depressed for years. In New England, for example, home prices didn’t start rising until 1995, according to the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight’s Home Price Index for New England.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 251 Comments

Protecting bad actors?

From the NY Sun:

High Court Decision Could Protect Subprime Players

A decision by the U.S. Supreme Court could make it more difficult for investors to sue over the collapse of the subprime mortgage market.

Yesterday’s ruling puts strict limitations on when lawyers, accountants, and other professionals can be sued in securities fraud cases. The 5-3 decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta Inc. means that in many lawsuits over stock prices, only the “primary violators” of the alleged fraud can be sued. The court said private plaintiffs couldn’t bring such suits against defendants for “aiding and abetting” fraudulent bookkeeping.

While the decision’s most immediate effect is expected to be felt in lawsuits by Enron’s investors against investment banks, the decision could also put limits on suits by investors in mortgage-backed securities over the ongoing subprime mortgage crisis.

“There are a lot of people, credit rating agencies, mortgage consultants, and others who are immunized by this decision,” an expert on corporate governance at Columbia Law School, John Coffee, said.

“The importance of this decision to the subprime mortgage crisis is that professionals, whom we call ‘secondary actors,’ are less likely to be dragged into expensive litigation,” a co-chairwoman of the securities litigation practice at Foley Hoag LLP, Lisa Woods, said. Other legal experts questioned whether the decision would hinder investors holding mortgage-backed securities. Yesterday’s decision deals only with suits brought under federal securities laws.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | Comments Off on Protecting bad actors?

“It’s still not too late”

From the NY Daily News:

Queens-born John Paulson makes fortune on home foreclosures

John Paulson made billions betting that you could lose your home.

The Queens-born hedge fund titan scored big by making complex investments that would reap huge profits if housing prices drop and mortgage foreclosures rise.

As the housing market tanked, Paulson made $2.7 billion in the first nine months of 2007 to lead all hedge fund bosses.

Things are looking even better for him in ’08 as real estate prices crumble and millions of Americans struggle to stay in their homes.

“I’ve never been involved in a trade with such unlimited upside,” Paulson, 52, boasted to The Wall Street Journal.

Despite his regular New Yorker roots, Paulson made his biggest splash as a prophet of doom for American homeowners.

“Mortgage experts were too caught up” in their own happy talk, Paulson told The Journal.

Perhaps feeling twangs of compassion, Paulson donated $15 million to a nonprofit group that helps troubled homeowners keep their homes.

His funds jumped by up to 600% last year. And the sultan of subprime predicts there’s plenty of cash to be made by betting house prices will plunge further.

“It’s still not too late,” he crowed.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | Comments Off on “It’s still not too late”

“U.S. home price declines will be larger than previously forecast”

From Reuters:

S&P hikes mortgage loss expectations, ratings eyed

Standard & Poor’s on Tuesday raised its expectations of losses on subprime loans originated in 2006 by more than a third after signs that delinquencies and the U.S. housing market are worsening.

The expected losses for subprime loans made in 2006 — which other analysts have called the worst ever for the U.S. market — will probably rise to 19 percent, up from the previous estimate of 14 percent, S&P said in a statement.

The rating company is also assuming senior investors will receive less protection from cash flows as more loans are modified to stave off foreclosure, it said. Loan modifications may reduce projected cash flow as mortgage service companies freeze interest rates, the main feature of the nationwide plan supported by President George W. Bush.

The revisions may adversely affect ratings on outstanding mortgage-backed securities in an upcoming review, S&P said. Downgrades have already wreaked havoc on mortgage and banking companies by forcing billions of dollars in write-downs.

“These revisions reflect the growing economic consensus that U.S. home price declines will be larger than previously forecast and that the slump in the U.S. housing market is expected to last far longer,” S&P analysts wrote.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 87 Comments

Greenspan: Probability of recession “more likely higher than lower”

From the WSJ:

Greenspan Sees U.S. as Likely
In Recession, or Soon to Be
By GREG IP
January 15, 2008

The U.S. is probably in or about to enter a recession, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said.

The odds are “not overwhelming but they are marginally in that direction” of recession, Mr. Greenspan said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal.

“The symptoms are clearly there. Recessions don’t happen smoothly. They are usually signaled by a discontinuity in the market place, and the data of recent weeks could very well be characterized in that manner,” he said.

Specifically, he cited a drop in the Institute for Supply Management’s purchasing managers index to 47.7 in December after several months just above 50, the dividing line between expanding and contracting manufacturing activity. While “by no means conclusive, … [that] is the type of thing, if we were going into recession, we’d observe.”

Another sign, he said, was the jump in the unemployment rate to 5% in December from 4.7% in November.

Mr. Greenspan first publicly raised the possibility of recession in February of last year, and put the odds at about 33%. He said in mid-December the odds had risen to about 50%.

Yesterday, he said the odds were still close to 50% but “more likely higher than lower.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 317 Comments