From the Boston Globe:
THERE IS little doubt that the unraveling of the housing market will cause significant hardship to many homeowners who believed that the American dream would never turn on them or their biggest financial investment. Similarly, the pain inflicted upon unsuspecting and often minority borrowers by predatory lenders will also be devastating as housing prices deflate to more realistic levels.
Putting true victims of the housing crisis aside, there is a category of debtor that could be called “predatory borrowers.” These are individuals who have treated their homes like bottomless ATM machines and have played the housing game like “Wheel of Fortune.” These borrowers purchased homes with little money down, with perhaps no income verification, and at debt levels they knew they could not sustain if their homes did not continue to appreciate.
Like inebriated bar patrons who blame the bartender for serving them too much, a segment of today’s borrowers willfully chose to borrow beyond their means and are now blaming the lender. A number of these borrowers, now charitably known as “victims,” also chose to borrow on one house to buy another and collateralized their future in search of speculative riches.
There is little question that truly predatory lenders, whose sole strategy was to dupe unsuspecting and often unsophisticated individuals into borrowing, should be punished. But for those borrowers who mortgaged a lifestyle they knew they could not sustain, the system should not come to their rescue.
It is remarkable how quickly the sentiment surrounding the housing market has turned from embracing accommodating lenders who facilitated people’s ability to benefit from the unending price spiral of real estate to now vilifying the same lenders for making borrowing too easy. In an upcoming election year, politicians simply lack the courage to make individuals accountable for their actions. Rather, it is more expedient to blame faceless corporations for any negative outcome to the consumer simply because more votes come from homeowners than from corporate boardrooms.
As children, we were taught that consuming too much cake and ice cream would have the consequences of a stomachache. But for many adults, who have gorged themselves on too much debt, their financial indulgence is now somehow someone else’s fault and they should not have to pay the price.
If the government does come up with some plan to bail out irresponsible homeowners, does this mean that Uncle Sam will get a piece of the upside if the market snaps back? While we are at it, should the government also provide a safety net to those in Las Vegas whose luck has gone sour at the poker table or unfortunate stock market investors whose risky stock purchases did not pan out?
It is time to separate the true victims of the housing meltdown from those who created their own house of cards. If homeowners own multiple properties, they should be excluded from government help, and the same should apply to those who have refinanced their mortgages to pull the maximum dollars out of their homes.