What’s 2026 got for us?

From Yahoo Finance:

Housing market predictions for 2026: What buyers, renters, and homeowners can expect

If you’ve felt sidelined by the real estate market in years past, it’s fair to wonder whether 2026 finally looks different or whether it’s just another version of the same frustrations. The short answer is that the market does look calmer heading into 2026, but not dramatically cheaper or easier. Expert housing market predictions for 2026 suggest a market where preparation, flexibility, and local conditions are more crucial than chasing the perfect moment to buy, sell, or relocate.

As of Dec. 11, 2025, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate sat at 6.22%, according to Freddie Mac. That’s progress compared to rates in 2023 and early 2024, but still expensive relative to the rock-bottom pandemic rates that are now in the rearview mirror.

Looking ahead to 2026, expert mortgage rate predictions largely agree on the direction, but not on the specifics. Many expect mortgage rates to go down in 2026. Zillow and Realtor.com point to mortgage rates in the low- to mid-6% range as inflation continues to cool. In its November Housing Forecast, however, Fannie Mae predicts that the 30-year rate will hit 5.9% by the end of next year.

What’s striking is how restrained those projections are. No one is talking about a return to mortgage rates in the 3% range. Not seriously, anyway. That era appears to be over, at least for now.

Most major housing forecasts indicate a market that’s slowing down, rather than reversing. Zillow’s latest outlook projects modest price growth, with national home values expected to rise about 1.2% in 2026. Redfin’s forecast falls within a similar range, predicting roughly 1% year-over-year growth as part of a gradual reset rather than a correction.

The reason prices remain resilient comes back to supply. Even as listings improve from recent lows, housing inventory still hasn’t returned to pre-pandemic levels.

That shortage isn’t uniform. In some markets, inventory has rebounded faster. In other areas, particularly across parts of the Northeast and Midwest, Realtor.com data shows listings still lag well behind 2019 levels. In those areas, competition hasn’t disappeared, even if it’s less intense than it once was.

This is where many 2026 housing market predictions begin to fall apart a bit.

On paper, the housing market already appears more favorable to buyers than it did a few years ago. Realtor.com’s November 2025 market data shows the typical home spent about 64 days on the market, roughly three days longer than a year earlier — the 20th straight month of year-over-year increases in time on market. Meanwhile, Redfin’s October national housing data highlights a market where sales and listings have barely moved, a sign that homes aren’t selling as quickly as they did during the pandemic-era frenzy.

That sounds like a buyer’s market. It isn’t — at least not everywhere.

Posted in Economics, National Real Estate | 102 Comments

Will it unlock the market?

From the Realtors:

Could Capital Gains Tax Cuts Lower Home Prices? 2 Proposals Are on the Table

There are two proposals driving the capital gains debate in Washington right now.

The first is a bill from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) that would eliminate capital gains taxes entirely on primary-residence sales. 

“I just think this is a great gift for the American people, and it’s very core to what we were founded on,” Greene told Realtor.com® in an exclusive interview in July.

While President Donald Trump voiced his support for the measure, the proposal’s future has become unclear after the congresswoman announced that she’ll be departing Congress at the end of the year. That has put the more targeted More Homes on the Market Act, from Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-California) back at center stage.

Panetta’s bill would raise the federal capital gains exclusion on primary-home sales and then index it to inflation, so the threshold moves with the housing market instead of staying frozen for decades. 

It’s an elegant solution for a threshold that has been frozen in place since 1997, when the median home price was $145,000, and Netscape was America’s preferred web browser.

While Greene’s approach is more blunt, Panetta’s would still have a significant effect, roughly doubling the current exemption to $500,000 for individuals and $1 million for couples, restoring the law’s original intent to protect everyday homeowners, not penalize them.

For those skeptical that a simple tax reform could lead to more homes on the market and lower home prices, it helps to look at the last time the capital gains tax was reformed.

The 1997 Taxpayer Relief Act replaced a one-time capital gains exclusion for homeowners over age 55 with the current thresholds.

The shift wasn’t radical, but it did yield results: Researchers found that lowering the tax friction encouraged more people to sell, especially those near the new exemption threshold.

Around the same time, the repeal of the age-based exclusion also spurred mobility. Households in their early 50s, many of them empty nesters or downsizing after a divorce, became significantly more likely to move, according to another analysis. In targeted groups, mobility rose between 22% and 31%.

The people who moved weren’t random, either. They were often in high-appreciation markets, facing a higher expected tax bill if they stayed put, and primed to trade down. 

In other words, they looked a lot like today’s long-tenured owners in overheated metros, people sitting on large gains and grappling with whether now is the right time to sell.

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 57 Comments

Bye Bye AC

From the NY Post:

3 NYC casinos get licenses for Vegas-style gaming – with first to open as early as March

It’s a Big Apple casino jackpot.

Three high-profile casino projects got their final approval Monday from the state’s gaming commission – the last hurdle to bring Las Vegas-style gambling to the city.

The projects are Mets owner Steve Cohen’s and Hard Rock’s $8.1 billion plan to bring a gaming complex near Citi Field, Genting-Resorts World’s casino at Aqueduct Racetrack and Bally’s plan to open a casino on President Trump’s former golf course in the Bronx.

“The three approved casinos will generate billions of dollars for the MTA and education, create tens of thousands of jobs and deliver real benefits to their surrounding communities,” Gov. Kathy Hochul said in a statement.

“Each of the projects made significant commitments to their communities and to New York State, and the Gaming Commission was clear that they will hold these projects accountable and make sure they keep their promises.”

Genting-Resorts could offer live table games as early as March — because they already operate slots at Aqueduct and have an operational gaming facility.

Posted in NYC, Politics, South Jersey Real Estate | 86 Comments

Trouble in ’26?

From the Daily Mail:

US home prices turn negative as crash begins — a warning sign the real estate market is cracking

After years of eye-watering gains, America’s housing market just hit a chilling milestone: prices have officially gone negative.

What sounds like welcome news for frustrated buyers is actually a warning sign for the wider economy.

Falling prices make homeowners feel poorer, pull down household spending, drag on confidence, and can trigger deeper trouble in markets already stretched by high mortgage rates and shrinking savings.

Fresh daily data from Parcl Labs shows prices are now slightly below where they were a year ago, and have fallen 1.4 percent in the last three months alone. It’s not a crash, but it’s the first national decline since mid-2023.

The dip is nothing like the 27 percent crash during the Great Recession in 2008, but analysts say the ingredients for a broad slowdown are now falling into place.

‘The sharp increase in mortgage rates in 2022 and 2023 created an affordability shock,’ said Jason Lewris, co-founder of Parcl Labs. ‘Buyers were priced out, sales volumes dropped, and sellers had to adjust expectations.’

As well as high rates, experts say the drop is being driven by weaker demand, and more homes sitting unsold as stretched buyers back away.

That shift is beginning to show up in local markets. Austin is now down 10 percent year-on-year, Denver is down 5 percent, Tampa and Houston are both down 4 percent, and Atlanta and Phoenix have slipped about 3 percent.

Other areas, including Cleveland, Chicago and New York City, are still rising — as these areas have more demand than supply to offer homebuyers. 

Posted in Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 108 Comments

Where to live before you die

From AARP:

AARP’s Top 100 Places to Live for Older Adults 

What cities and towns have the qualities older adults value, such as a good job market, walkability and affordable housing? AARP’s Livability Index platformevaluates communities based on these criteria and more to come up with its annual list of best places to live.

Get healthy, stay healthy in very large communities: Population 500,000+

6. New York, New York
8. Nassau, New York
12. Hempstead, New York
15. Hudson County, New Jersey
17. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
20. Delaware County, Pennsylvania
21. Union County, New Jersey

Get involved in large communities: Population 100,000 to 499,999

8. North Hempstead, New York
17. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
23. Dauphin County, Pennsylvania
24. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
25. Elizabeth, New Jersey

Little need to drive in many of these midsize communities: Population 25,000 to 99,999

1. Cliffside Park, New Jersey
2. Fort Lee, New Jersey
9. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
11. Bergenfield, New Jersey
12. Union City, New Jersey
14. Lodi, New Jersey
17. Hoboken, New Jersey
20. Long Beach, New York
21. Valley Stream, New York

Great places to get to know your neighbors: Population 5,000 to 24,999

1. Great Neck Plaza, New York
10. Willison Park, New York
12. Fairview, New Jersey
13. Manorhaven, New York
15. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
16. Wallington, New Jersey
23. New Cumberland, Pennsylvania

Posted in Demographics, Economics, National Real Estate | 62 Comments

It was easier back then

From Zoocasa:

Why the “Good Ole Days” of Housing Are Gone: Tracking Affordability From 1965 to 2025

In 1965, Gatorade was invented, The Beatles’ “Help!” topped the charts, and The Sound of Musicpremiered. Beyond the pop culture milestones, that year also marked the last time you could buy a home for under $20,000.

Fast forward sixty years, and a lot has changed in the housing market. Not only do homes cost significantly more, but the median annual income now covers a smaller percentage of the total home price. 

So, it’s not just nostalgia that makes everything seem cheaper in the past; the data supports this. Zoocasa dived into the numbers to see exactly how much the median family income and the median sales price of a new home have changed from 1965 to 2025. And one thing is clear: housing affordability has deteriorated. 

In 1965, the median sales price of a new home was just $19,800. That’s approximately $206,000 in today’s dollars, which is still only half the price of a new home in 2025. 

But the affordability gap widens further when comparing income-to-price ratios. Family household incomes in 1965 were equivalent to 34.8% of the total cost of a new home, while in 2025, its equivalent to just 26.4% of a new home. So what caused this nearly 10% drop? 

For a long time, income growth was steadily rising. Between 1955 and 1985, the growth rate accelerated dramatically in each decade. The median family income increased by 56.4% from 1955 to 1965, then by 99.3% in the following decade, and peaked with a 102.2% increase from 1975 to 1985.

However, after 1985, income growth slowed considerably. The rate dropped from 48.6% in 1985-1995 to 40.7% in 1995-2005. Over the next ten years (2005 to 2015), the median family income increased by just 24.4% to $72,165. Most recently, from 2015 to 2025, growth recovered modestly, rising by 50.5%. 

At the same time, new home prices skyrocketed. In nearly every decade, new home price growth outpaced income growth, contributing to the widening gap. 

From 1955 to 1965, new home prices rose by 69%, only slightly ahead of the 67.9% increase in income. The following decade (1965 to 1975) marked the last time incomes exceeded new home price growth until 2015, rising by 99.3% while new home prices grew by 97%. After 1975, home price growth dominated until 2015. Home prices surged, posting decade increases of 116% (1975-1985), 59% (1985-1995), and 75% (1995-2005). 

Though the pace of home price growth has slowed in the past two decades, it will be a while before the affordability gap can close, particularly as other costs are simultaneously rising. 

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 105 Comments

Sorry tour guides, your time is almost up

From SmartCities Dive:

How AI is impacting homebuying

Artificial intelligence has infiltrated seemingly all aspects of digital activity, including homebuying.

Nearly all homebuyers use online platforms, according to a 2021 study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. Since then, more of those platforms are using AI.  

A recent GAO study revealed the potential benefits and pitfalls of incorporating AI into the homebuying process. Here are seven takeaways. 

AI underwriting systems can speed up document review and income and employment verification by scanning large volumes of loan files, according to the report. “This can reduce the time needed to assess borrower credit risk,” GAO stated.

Automated underwriting systems may also improve default risk predictions by identifying patterns not captured in traditional underwriting, incorporating more data to help determine a borrower’s ability to pay, according to GAO. “This may expand credit access for homebuyers with multiple or inconsistent income streams, such as gig workers, whose income can be difficult to assess,”GAO stated. 

Studies have shown the existence of racial bias in traditional home appraisals. By not considering the race of a home buyer or seller, AI models have the potential to reduce that bias — or perpetuate it. “While automated valuation models do not take into account the race of participants in individual transactions, they may perpetuate valuation disparities by continuing to undervalue properties in historically undervalued communities,” GAO said. The study emphasized the importance of reviewing AI models for potential bias and implementing guardrails. 

The study also concluded online platforms’ use of some AI models could violate fair housing laws by discriminating against certain users. “For example, if search algorithms and chatbots are not trained to recognize problematic search terms — such as references to protected class characteristics like race, national origin, disability, or religion — they may generate search results that illegally ‘steer’ consumers to certain listings,” GAO stated.

The use of AI in online real estate platforms can distort housing prices, according to GAO. The agency reviewed one study that found Zillow’s valuation tool affected listing and sales prices “in several U.S. cities,” driving higher listing prices and property valuations in affected areas.

Aside from the Federal Housing Finance Agency, federal oversight “generally has not focused specifically” on property technology products, according to GAO. Additionally, FHFA this year began waiving components of its fair lending rule and rescinding related guidance, GAO stated. GAO recommended FHFA provide updated written direction to online platforms clarifying how they should comply with fair lending requirements and how that compliance will be supervised. 

Posted in Economics, Employment, National Real Estate | 56 Comments

Still not enough to live in NJ

From NJ Digest:

How Much Salary Do You Really Need to Buy a House in New Jersey in 2025? A New Report Has the Answer

A new analysis from New Jersey real estate expert Robert Dekanski of Re/Max looks to answer a question on every NJ renter’s mind: how much do I have to make to afford a home in New Jersey?

The results are blunt, to say the least. 

Dekanski’s 2025 breakdown found that the average household must earn $152,186 annually to afford a typical New Jersey home. If that sounds expensive to you, you’re right. That number makes NJ the ninth most expensive place to purchase a house in the nation.

It’s not the same in every corner of New Jersey—location within the state comes with large swings in price. The same exact house may require up to $50,000 more in income than its South Jersey counterpart. Property taxes, the highest in America, can add a major burden to those in the market, often increasing monthly housing costs by 15 to 20 percent. 

Dekanski’s report shows that getting approved for a mortgage in New Jersey isn’t just about the list price. Taxes, insurance and a higher general cost-of-living push affordability to its limit.

In Bergen County, the median home price sits around $790,000, requiring roughly $180,000 to $200,000 in annual income to afford. Morris County buyers face salary expectations of $155,000 to $170,000 for a median home price of around $723,000. Somerset County’s median of $680,000 translates to a needed income of about $145,000 to $160,000. Essex County hovers between $140,000 and $155,000 for a $705,000 median house. All things considered, Union County comes in on the low end, but still requires roughly $135,000 to $150,000 to land a home priced somewhere around $695,000.

Because of its beach access, Monmouth County remains expensive. Monmouth County also remains connected to NYC with commuter options, further driving price. Buyers in the Shore county need between $165,000 and $180,000 for a median home price of $710,000. Middlesex County delivers a better balance: a median price of roughly $555,000 and an income requirement slightly lower, around $130,000 to $145,000. Amenities, job centers and transit access keep demand strong, but your dollar should still go much further in Central Jersey than in the North. 

With a median home price around $270,000, Cumberland County requires only $55,000 to $65,000 in annual income to afford a home. Salem County is similar, with $58,000 to $68,000 needed for a median $265,000 home. Warren County offers a similar story—$425,000 median home price requiring about $85,000 to $95,000 in income. However, the lower costs come with a tradeoff: these areas of New Jersey offer fewer major employers and longer commuting times.  

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Housing Bubble, New Jersey Real Estate | 96 Comments

Blaming immigrants for our increase in wealth

From FactCheck.org:

Vance’s Misleading Claims on Housing Prices and Illegal Immigration

Vice President JD Vance has exaggerated the increase in home prices during President Joe Biden’s time in office and has misleadingly pointed to illegal immigration as a primary cause of a rise in prices.

In a Fox News interview on Nov. 13, Vance said that “the price of a new home literally doubled” under Biden. But home sales price measures show at most a 37% increase. Vance appears to be referring to an increase in the monthly cost of new homes, an increase that factors in a rise in mortgage rates.  

In that interview and in a Dec. 2 Cabinet meeting, Vance pointed to illegal immigration as a primary cause. “Why did homes get so unaffordable?” he said in the Cabinet meeting. “Because we had 20 million illegal aliens in this country taking homes that ought by right to go to American citizens,” he said, using an exaggerated figure.

According to federal data, home prices increased during the Biden administration, but not nearly as much as Vance claimed. The Census Bureau and Department of Housing and Urban Development data show there was a 21.1% increase in the median sales price of new homes, rising from $354,800 in January 2021 to $429,600 in January 2025. 

The National Association of Realtors’ seasonally adjusted annual sales figures show a similar trend for existing single-family homes. In 2024, the national median price was $412,500, a 37.4% increase from 2020, the year before Biden took office.

“There are a couple of things going on,” Vigdor said. “Demographically, birth rates are falling and the population is aging, which will naturally reduce the number of young families looking to purchase a home. That softens the demand side.” He added that “buyers may also be waiting for interest rates to come down, or for macroeconomic uncertainty associated with tariffs and other Trump administration initiatives to resolve.”

“I reported that every immigrant entering a local housing market, which I defined as a county, raises home values by about 11.6 cents,” Vigdor, who released a study in 2013 examining the link between immigration and housing prices, explained in an email. Using the Pew Research Center estimate for the unauthorized population, Vigdor estimated “32,000 unauthorized immigrants in the ‘typical’ American housing market, which suggests a boost to home values of under $4,000, or less than 1% of the current median sales price in the US.”

Steven A. Camarota, director of research for the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that supports lower levels of immigration, said in September 2024 testimony to Congress that immigration was driving an increase in demand for rental housing. His analysis, he said, “indicates that a 5-percentage point increase in the recent immigrant share of a metro area’s population is associated with a 12 percent increase in the average U.S.-born household’s rent, relative to their income.” He noted that this was “only a simple correlation and does not include homeowners. Much more detailed analysis would be necessary to confirm this relationship.”

Other experts acknowledge that immigration overall plays a role in the supply and demand of housing, but they also point to larger factors driving home prices in recent years. 

Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, also pushed back against Vance’s assertions. “It is misplaced to blame immigration for the runup in house prices since the pandemic,” he told us in an email, noting that “[m]ost new immigrants rent” and the construction industry is “more dependent” than any other “on immigrant workers.”

Frost’s analysis also said that immigrants are strong contributors to the housing supply side as they accounted for 34% of construction trade jobs in 2023, based on Census data.

“The recent flat house prices are unrelated to less immigration, as immigrants generally don’t own homes,” said Zandi, whose work was frequently referenced by the Biden administration. “However, affordability remains a problem given high mortgage rates and the previous runup in house prices, rising homeowner insurance rates, and property taxes.”

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 85 Comments

Only 60%?

From Visual Capitalist:

Here’s Where Home Prices Surged the Most in North America (2005–2025)

Home prices across North America have surged over the past two decades, driven by population growth, limited housing supply, and post-pandemic demand.

This infographic shows how average home prices have changed from July 2005 to July 2025 across 25 major North American cities, based on Zillow data compiled by Hanif Bayat.

On average, home prices across the top 25 cities in North America have risen by 92%, or nearly doubled, between 2005 and 2025.

The top three fastest-appreciating cities are all in Canada. Vancouver leads with a 175% increase since 2005, followed by Montreal at 167% and Toronto with a 165% rise.

Canada’s big metros have experienced rapid population growth and strong foreign-buyer interest, combining to create some of the world’s hottest real estate markets. Vancouver and Toronto, in particular, have faced long-term housing shortages and rank among America’s least affordable housing markets.

In the United States, cities in the Sunbelt region in the South have seen their home prices more than double since 2005. These include Dallas (140%), Charlotte (134%), and Denver (125%), followed by Seattle (119%), which is the only more northern metro among the top five U.S. cities.

Houston and Atlanta have also seen strong growth in home prices, along with Miami and Tampa in Florida.

Despite being the three most expensive housing markets, major coastal cities like San Francisco (80%), Los Angeles (73%), and San Diego (71%) show relatively slower growth in home prices. On the East Coast, prices in New York have also grown moderately, rising 60% over the last two decades.

These coastal metros were already expensive in 2005, leaving less room for percentage-based appreciation as compared to Southern cities like Dallas and Houston.

Meanwhile, among the top 25 cities, home prices have grown slowest in Washington, D.C. and Chicago, rising 41% between 2005 and 2025.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, National Real Estate | 61 Comments

We know we’re hot, tell us something we don’t know.

From USA Today:

What will be the hottest housing markets of 2026? See Redfin’s list

A real estate company has released its projections for the hottest United States housing markets in 2026.

The Redfin report published on Dec. 2 anticipates U.S. homebuyers will begin to get some relief in the new year as affordability improves and income growth begins to outpace home-price growth.

“Next year will mark the beginning of a long, slow recovery for the housing market,” Redfin said in the report.

Projected hottest housing markets for 2026

According to Redfin’s report, the hottest housing markets next year are expected to be:

  • New York City suburbs: Long Island, Hudson Valley, Northern New Jersey and Fairfield County, Connecticut
  • Syracuse, New York
  • Cleveland, Ohio
  • St Louis, Missouri
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Madison, Wisconsin
Posted in National Real Estate, New Jersey Real Estate | 34 Comments

Not going to be a good year for Florida

From CBS News:

Home prices are poised to dip in 22 U.S. cities next year, a new analysis says. See where.

It’s still a tough time to get a foothold in the housing market, with homes sitting near record values and mortgage rates parked well above 6%. But the tide could turn in 2026, with property prices forecast to dip in 22 of the largest 100 U.S. cities and mortgage rates expected to ease slightly, according to a new analysis from Realtor.com.

The real estate market is expected to move in a more “buyer-friendly” direction next year, leading to the “most balanced housing market” since the pandemic, meaning that neither sellers nor buyers are likely to have the upper hand in negotiations, said Jake Krimmel, a senior economist at Realtor.com.

Mortgage rates are expected to dip to an average of 6.3% next year, a slight drop from 2025’s 6.6% average rate. Lower borrowing costs, as well as strong wage growth next year, should encourage more buyers to jump into the market, Krimmel added.

“2026 is going to be a year where we think the market is going to steady,” Krimmel said. “It’s going to show a lot of signs of getting back on track to what we consider to be normal.”

Most of the 22 cities where home prices are forecast to drop next year are located in the Southeast and the West. For instance, seven of the eight largest cities in Florida are projected to see declines in home prices next year, with the sole exception of Miami, the report said. 

The Cape Coral-Fort Lauderdale metropolitan area is expected to see the nation’s largest price decline next year, with homes dropping by 10.2%, the analysis says. That’s followed by the North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, Florida region, with an 8.9% decline.

The cities with projected price drops include those where inventory has expanded, providing more choices for buyers, Krimmel said. Some of those metropolitan areas may now also have lighter demand from buyers compared with the COVID-era real estate boom, which was fueled by low mortgage rates and a shift to work-at-home policies.

“These places, among others, saw a huge frenzy during the pandemic, so part of what we are projecting is that demand continuing to come back down to earth,” Krimmel told CBS News.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 109 Comments

No Doc is BACK baby!

From Business Insider:

The wannabe real estate moguls going bust

Applying for a home loan is a pain. You have to produce a heap of documents — bank statements, tax returns, employment records, tallies of investment accounts — to prove the stability of your financial footing, then wait for a mortgage underwriterto comb through all of it before giving you the thumbs up. I spoke with one exasperated homebuyer who described the process as a “borderline invasion of privacy.”

While the average American submits to a financial colonoscopy en route to their dream home, wannabe real estate moguls have found a way to sidestep the hassle. With the help of a once-obscure type of loan, they’ve built mini-empires ranging from a few homes to a few hundred — without the usual scrutiny from lenders. These landlords include small-time investors eager to expand their portfolios, TikTok tycoons seeking new streams of real estate revenue, and seasoned property managers looking to make smart bets. In recent years, they’ve taken out billions of dollars’ worth of “debt-service coverage ratio” loans — often abbreviated as DSCR — to hoover up homes. The loans enable income-seeking owners to quickly purchase rental properties while dodging annoying questions about their job history or outstanding debts. DSCRs may sound complicated, but obtaining one is relatively straightforward: A landlord just has to show their lender that the desired property will generate enough rent to cover the monthly payments and other basic expenses, such as taxes and insurance. The lender focuses on the property’s cash flow, not the borrower’s personal creditworthiness.

For some of these landlords, the cash isn’t flowing as planned. Serious delinquencies on DSCR loans have nearly quadrupled in the past three years, data from the real estate analytics firm Cotality shows. Although the troubled loans account for only a small fraction of the total dollar amount of outstanding DSCR loans, they’re a sign that debt-laden landlords face shakier economics amid a rental market slowdown. And while people in the industry defend the idea behind the loans — “It’s still a great product,” one lending veteran tells me — they acknowledge the spread of some sketchy practices that contributed to the spike in bad debt, including ambitious rent targets, hasty approvals, and loans for properties where the rental income wouldn’t even cover the basic monthly payments.

Posted in Crisis, Housing Bubble, Mortgages, National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 76 Comments

The end of increases?

From Newsweek:

How US home sales are predicted to rise across 2026

Redfin believes that 2026 will be the year of a “Great Housing Reset.” A gradual increase in affordability will release buyers from the sidelines of the U.S. housing market, encouraging more transactions.

This process won’t happen overnight but will be “yearslong,” Redfin said. Income will rise faster than home prices “for a prolonged period of time for the first time since the Great Recession era,” the real estate brokerage wrote. Home prices will stabilize rather than decline, leading to a “long, slow recovery” in affordability nationwide.

Redfin expects the median U.S. home-sale price to rise 1 percent year-over-year through 2026, a slow growth due to the fact that demand will remain hindered by a “weaker economy” and “still-high mortgage rates and prices.”

This smaller price growth, combined with dipping mortgage rates, will also contribute to lower monthly housing payments growing more slowly than wages.

Redfin predicts that sales of existing homes will end 2026 up 3 percent from 2025, with sales coming in at an annualized rate of 4.2 million.

The improvement in affordability, driven by wages growing faster than home prices next year, will get some buyers off the sidelines, but many will stay there.

Homeownership will remain out of reach for many Gen Zers and young families across the country, Redfin said, who will explore non-traditional living situations to afford housing, including living with their parents and with roommates and delaying having children.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 103 Comments

The New Peak

From Calculated Risk:

Inflation Adjusted House Prices 3.0% Below 2022 Peak

It has been 19 years since the housing bubble peak, ancient history for many readers!

In the September Case-Shiller house price index released last Tuesday, the seasonally adjusted National Index (SA), was reported as being 78% above the bubble peak. However, in real terms, the National index (SA) is about 9.4% above the bubble peak (and historically there has been an upward slope to real house prices). The composite 20, in real terms, is 0.9% above the bubble peak.

People usually graph nominal house prices, but it is also important to look at prices in real terms. As an example, if a house price was $300,000 in January 2010, the price would be $447,000 today adjusted for inflation (49% increase). That is why the second graph below is important – this shows “real” prices.

The third graph shows the price-to-rent ratio, and the fourth graph is the affordability index. The last graph shows the 5-year real return based on the Case-Shiller National Index.

The second graph shows the same two indexes in real terms (adjusted for inflation using CPI).

In real terms (using CPI), the National index is 3.0% below the recent peak, and the Composite 20 index is 3.2% below the recent peak in 2022.

Posted in Housing Bubble, National Real Estate | 62 Comments