2015 – Year of the first-timer?

From the Record:

First-time buyers key to housing

Joy Abma, 23, and Dan Charnesky, 24, expected to rent an apartment after their wedding this spring.

But when they looked at the high rents — and the difficulty of finding a place that would take their three dogs — they decided to try to buy a home instead. “We had been saving for a very long time, so we ended up with enough money for a down payment,” said Abma, a nurse who lives in Wyckoff.

After several months of looking, she and Charnesky, a landscaper, are to close on an Oakland split-level house this month. “We thought, ‘We might as well do it while we’re young,’ ” Abma said.

But buying a home when you’re young is more difficult than ever. Thanks to high student debt, stricter mortgage standards and years of slow employment and income growth, people in their 20s and 30s have found it tough to get their first toehold in homeownership — and that’s a problem for the whole real estate market. Without enough first-timers to jump-start a chain of purchases, homeowners can’t trade up to their second and third homes.

First-timers may return to the market in greater numbers this year, however, according to some analysts, who point to low interest rates, a stronger job market and high rents, all of which make buying more attractive.

But in 2014, first-timers made up about 33 percent of buyers — the lowest share in nearly three decades, and well below the historic average of about 40 percent, according to a survey by the National Association of Realtors.

A recent study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that only 32 percent of 30-year-olds owned their homes in 2013, down from 44 percent in 2006-07, before the recession hit. The drop is especially notable among people with student debt, the New York Fed said.

The millennial generation is “not entering the housing market as purchasers or renters at anywhere near where prior cohorts have done,” said Patrick O’Keefe, an economist with CohnReznick, an accounting firm in New York and Roseland. “One of the reasons is the soft job market, and relatively little income growth for those who have jobs.” In addition, he said, they’re “burdened with significant debt, primarily student debt.”

But recent research suggests that young adults would be very interested in homeownership — if they could afford it. A recent survey of people age 18 to 29 by the Demand Institute, which studies consumer demand around the world, found that 24 percent already owned their homes, and 60 percent plan to buy someday. And three in four believe ownership is an excellent investment. But 44 percent think it will be difficult to qualify for a mortgage.

Who they are, what they did

First-timer median age was 31.
One in 10 bought a condo or town house.
One in four said saving for a down payment was difficult.
Of those, 57 percent said student loans delayed saving.
Four out of five used their own savings.
One in four received a gift from a friend or relative.
More than nine out of 10 chose a fixed-rate mortgage.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Housing Recovery | 94 Comments

Lowest priced homes not sharing in the recovery

From HousingWire:

Black Knight: Affordable homes lagging behind in home price recovery

In the 10 states where prices are still furthest from their pre-crisis peaks, homes in the bottom 20% value tier are lagging – sometimes considerably – in recovery as compared to the highest valued properties, according to Black Knight’s November Mortgage Monitor.

In California, for example, properties in the top 20% price tier are now just over 3% behind their pre-crisis peaks; the lowest 20% are still 32% off those peaks.

In many cases, these disparities boil down to the fact that during the bubble, lower-tier properties appreciated at much higher rates than higher-valued properties, then fell harder and further when the bubble broke.

According to Trey Barnes, Black Knight’s senior vice president of Loan Data Products, home price recovery for the lowest 20% of property values has lagged behind those at the top in America’s hardest hit states.

“We looked at HPI appreciation from pre-crisis peaks to today in the 10 states currently trailing the furthest behind their pre-crisis housing maximums,” said Barnes. “The data showed a clear difference in the levels of recovery among home price tiers. The Black Knight HPI separates home values for every geographical division into five equal tiers; those in the lowest 20% of home values have been lagging behind their higher-valued counterparts in recovery to pre-crisis peaks, sometimes considerably.

“For example, in Nevada – overall, still more than 39% off its pre-crisis peak – properties in the lowest tier are nearly 47% off their peaks, as compared to 36% for those in the highest tier. In California, an even starker contrast emerges: properties in the highest tier have now come within just over 3% of their pre-crisis peak, while those in the lowest 20% are still almost 32% down. In many cases, these disparities between price tiers can be attributed to the fact that during the bubble, lower-tier properties appreciated at much higher rates than higher-valued properties and likewise fell harder and further when the bubble broke.”

Posted in Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 71 Comments

The future belongs to them

From the Atlantic:

Can Immigrants Save the Housing Market?

Since the recession, there’s been concern over the lack of new households formed and the decreased rate of homeownership in the U.S. And while some suggest that the share of people who choose to buy instead of rent should never ratchet up to the nearly 70 percent seen at the height of the bubble, many lament the loss of the American Dream,which promoted buying a home as a symbol of success and adulthood.

But in some groups the dream, at least of homeownership, is alive and well. During the past two decades, immigrants have accounted for 27.5 percent of all household growth, according to the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. When it comes to growth among younger generations, the foreign-born population is even more significant, accounting for nearly all the household growth for those under the age of 45.

Last year, immigrant households made up 11.2 percent of owner-occupied housing according to the JCHS—that’s up from only 6.8 percent in 1994.

The exact rate of homeownership varies among different immigrant groups, but overall the share of immigrants who own homes is growing. In 2000, the rate of homeownership among immigrants stood at 49.8 percent, according to a study by the Research Housing Institute of America. By 2010 the rate was 52.4 percent, and by 2020 that number will climb to about 55.7 percent, the study predicts. In the third quarter of 2014 the overall homeownership rate in the U.S. was 64.4 percent, according to the Census Bureau.

There are several reasons behind the growth rate in homeownership for immigrants, but part of the impetus may be that many immigrant populations are less cynical about the idea of homeownership than their American-born counterparts. “They view homeownership as a piece of the rock. It’s a benchmark of being settled,” says Dowell Myers, a professor at the Sol Price School of Public Policy at USC. “They view homeownership as the American Dream and they buy into that.”

Even more compelling are the possibilities for homeownership among the children of immigrants. “When you look at the children of immigrants they actually exceed the native born on a lot of measures: on income, on education, on homeownership,” says Masnick.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 66 Comments

Sound familiar?

From Bloomberg:

Obama to Cut FHA Mortgage Insurance Premiums to Boost Homeownership

In an effort to expand homeownership among lower-income buyers, President Barack Obama plans to cut mortgage-insurance premiums charged by a government agency.

The annual fees the Federal Housing Administration charges to guarantee mortgages will be cut by 0.5 percentage point, to 0.85 percent of the loan balance, Julian Castro, secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said today during a conference call with reporters. Under the new premium structure, FHA estimates that 2 million borrowers will be able to save an average of $900 annually over the next three years if they purchase or refinance homes.

The FHA has been increasing premiums since 2011 to offset losses caused by defaults on mortgages it backed after the housing bubble burst. Housing industry participants say the increases in annual fees, which are now at 1.35 percent of the loan balance, are squeezing buyers with modest incomes out of the market.

“Lots of people have been locked out of the market, particularly lower-wealth borrowers and borrowers of color, by the high prices at FHA,” said Julia Gordon, director of housing finance and policy at the Center for American Progress, a group affiliated with Democrats. The premium cut “does put homeownership within the reach of more people.”

The FHA estimates that 250,000 first-time homebuyers will enter the market after the premium reductions.

Democrats and housing groups say reducing FHA fees will help the agency’s bottom line because it will boost the volume of lending, which declined when homebuyers had to pay more to obtain loans. A December study by the Mortgage Bankers Association said the premium increases had reduced the value of the insurance fund by $4.4 billion as higher costs drove away creditworthy borrowers.

Posted in Mortgages, Politics, Risky Lending | 227 Comments

Where to find the most and least expensive 4 bedroom in NJ

From the Daily Record:

N.J. homes among priciest, but S.J. offers some bargains

Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage has released its 2014 Home Listing Report, which found New Jersey to have the fourth highest average listing price in the nation, at $440,354 for a four-bedroom, two-bathroom home.

However, half of the state’s 10 most affordable real-estate markets are in South Jersey, according to the Coldwell Banker Home Listing Report.

The report, which additionally ranked 128 real estate markets within New Jersey, named Chatham Township as having the highest average listing price, at $892,489 for a four-bedroom, two-bathroom home, while East Orange ranked as the most affordable market in the state, with an average listing price of $120,000.

The top 10 most expensive New Jersey real estate markets, based on average listing price, are: Chatham Township, $892,489; Bernards Township, $832,878; Madison Borough, $777,490; Mountain Lakes Borough, $724,490; Princeton Junction/West Windsor Township, $722,912; Livingston Township, $720,787; Westfield Town, $720,221; Warren Township, $718,909; Alexandria Township, $712,433 and Woodcliff Lake Borough, $678,623.

The top 10 most affordable New Jersey real estate markets, based on average listing price, are: East Orange, $120,000; Newark, $147,981; Roselle, $173,419; Paterson, $178,156; Deptford, W. Deptford, Woodbury, $181,6396; Atco, $186,380; Glassboro, $206,900; Elizabeth, $210,000; Sicklerville, $217,479; Millville, $219,052.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Housing Recovery, New Jersey Real Estate | 172 Comments

NJ tops United Van Lines migration report again

From the Star Ledger:

People are fleeing N.J. faster than any other state, moving company says

Nearly two of every three families making an interstate move involving New Jersey last year were leaving the Garden State, the highest rate in the country.

New Jersey had the greatest percentage of outbound moves of any state nationally last year with almost 65 percent departing, according to a company which bills itself as the largest transporter of household goods in the country.

The Garden State has led the nation in outward migration for the fourth time in five years.

In all, United said it tracked 4,003 moves out of New Jersey in 2014 compared to 2,169 inbound.

Nearly half of those leaving New Jersey were bound for Florida (15 percent), California (14), Texas (9) and North Carolina (7.5), spokeswoman Melissa Sullivan told NJ Advance Media.

Retirement and jobs were the top reasons to leave the state last year, according to a United Survey of departing New Jerseyans.

Among the other states where more people moved out than in, New York’s rate was second at 64 percent with Illinois third (63 percent). Two other northeast states also ranked in the top 10 — Pennsylvania was ninth and Connecticut 10th.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Property Taxes | 158 Comments

Millennials moving to least affordable metros

From Fusion:

The Washington DC-area is now the most millennial-soaked region in the country

From RealtyTrac:

Renting Less Affordable Than Buying in Most U.S. Markets But Not Where Millennials Are Moving Most

RealtyTrac analyzed 2015 fair market rental data recently released by the U.S. Department for Housing and Urban Development for three-bedroom properties in 543 counties nationwide with a population of at least 100,000. In the 473 counties with sufficient rental and home price data, the fair market rent for a three-bedroom property in 2015 will require an average of 27 percent of median household income, while buying a median-priced home requires an average of 25 percent of median household income based on the median sales price in November.

Buying a median-priced home was more affordable than renting a three-bedroom property in 68 percent of the counties analyzed, representing 57 percent of the total population in those counties.

But in the 25 counties with the biggest increase in millennials between 2007 and 2013, fair market rents for a three-bedroom property in 2015 will require 30 percent of the median household income on average while buying a median-priced home requires 36 percent of median household income on average. For the analysis millennials were defined as anyone born between 1977 and 1992.

“First-time buyers and potential boomerang homebuyers are stuck between a rock and a hard place in today’s housing market: many of the markets with the jobs and amenities they want have hard-to-afford rents and even harder-to-afford home prices; while the more affordable markets have fewer well-paying jobs and tend to be off the beaten path,” said Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac. “Those emerging markets with the combination of good jobs, good affordability and a growing population of new renters and potential first-time homebuyers represent the best opportunities for buy-and-hold real estate investors to buy low and benefit from rising rents in the years to come.”

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Housing Recovery | 98 Comments

Predictions 2015!

This is becoming a tradition around here, so here we go again! You know how this works, break out the crystal balls and prognosticate.

Ground Rules

Predictions provided should either be for June 30th, 2015 or December 31st, 2015, please specify.

Provide justification for your forecast, where applicable (unless you are just making it up, if so, state that).

You may provide any caveats and/or assumptions that your forecast is based on.

You need not provide a forecast for all categories below.

Where applicable, forecasts are judged against the surveys/reports listed.

Real Estate
National
Existing Home Sales – NAR
Existing Home Price – S&P Case Shiller HPI
Existing Home Price – Other
National New Home Sales – NAHB
Median New Home Price – NAHB

New Jersey
Existing Home Sales – NAR/NJAR
Existing Home Price – S&P Case Shiller HPI
Existing Home Price – Other

Commodities
Energy (Oil, NatGas)
Metals (Gold, Silver, Copper)

Equities
United States
International Developed Markets
Emerging Markets

Mortgage Financing
30-Year Fixed – Freddie Mac PMMS
15-Year Fixed – Freddie Mac PMMS

Foreclosures
Delinquency Rate
Foreclosure Rate

Macroeconomic
10y Treasury
Fed Funds Rate
National Unemployment Rate
New Jersey Unemployment Rate

Oddball
Anything else you’d like to make a prediction about.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Foreclosures, Housing Recovery | 191 Comments

Pending Home Sales Jump in November

From the WSJ:

U.S. Pending Home Sales Rise in November

New data on home sales released Wednesday offer few signs suggesting a breakout for the U.S. housing market, but they also offered little proof of a renewed slowdown.

The number of contracts signed to buy previously owned homes rose to the third-highest level of the year in November, the latest sign of how housing demand firmed up in the second half of 2014 after a sluggish start.

The National Association of Realtors said its index measuring pending home sales, reflecting sales that have gone into contract but haven’t yet closed, rose 0.8% from October and 4.1% from a year earlier on a seasonally adjusted basis. That represents the largest year-over-year gain for the index since August 2013.

The Realtors’ index showed that contract activity picked up in the Northeast, South and West in November but fell 0.4% in the Midwest. Pending sales in the South hit their highest level since July 2013, and the seasonally adjusted index for that region has been higher in only three other months since the housing bust began in 2007.

After a two-year rebound, housing demand faltered in the middle of 2013 amid inventory shortages, rising prices and a sudden increase in mortgage rates. Demand stayed soft in early 2014, during a particularly cold winter, but improved in the summer, a period during which mortgage rates floated down.

“The market overpriced itself this year, and buyers are very price sensitive right now,” said Glenn Kelman, chief executive of real-estate brokerage Redfin.

Posted in Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 80 Comments

Is the slowdown good news?

From MarketWatch:

Home-price growth, now at two-year low, may accelerate in 2015

Home prices cooled in October, pulling down annual growth to the slowest pace in two years, but there are hints that the market could pick up next year.

U.S. home prices ticked down 0.1% in October from September, according to S&P/Case-Shiller’s 20-city composite index released Tuesday. Prices dropped in 10 cities, increased in eight, and were unchanged in two.

Meanwhile, the pace of annual growth also pulled back, with year-over-year home prices rising 4.5% in October — the slowest pace in two years — compared with an annual gain of 4.8% in September. Economists polled by Dow Jones Newswires had expected year-over-year price growth to slow to 4.7% in October.

But here’s why there could be a pickup again in 2015: Fewer cities are seeing slower annual home-price growth. There were 12 cities that posted slower year-over-year home-price growth in October than in September. That’s a large drop from August, when all 20 cities saw slower annual home-price growth.

“After a long period when home prices rose, but at a slower pace with each passing month, we are seeing hints that prices could end 2014 on a strong note and accelerate into 2015,” said David Blitzer, chairman of the index committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices.

More than half of U.S. states are on track to hit or surpass peak bubble-era levels by the middle of 2015, and there’s some concern about certain markets getting overheated, according to separate data. However, areas that were hit particularly hard when the housing bubble burst, such as markets in Nevada and Florida, are still struggling.

Cooler appreciation may lure buyers who feel that they’ll have a better shot at getting a fair deal, and make homebuying a more realistic choice for families that haven’t seen quickly rising wages in recent years.

“A slower-moving housing market is inherently more stable, more balanced between buyers and sellers and more sustainable over the long-term,” said Stan Humphries, chief economist at real estate site Zillow.

But there’s also a darker side to slower home-price growth: It could take longer for equity to rise for owners, which in the past has helped homeowners who owe more on a mortgage than the home is worth and struggling with their payments. In the third quarter, about 17% of homeowners with a mortgage had negative equity, compared with 21% a year earlier, according to Zillow. That share could decline to 15% by the end of 2015’s third quarter.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Housing Recovery | 45 Comments

Corelogic: Housing trends and predictions for 2015

From Housingwire:

CoreLogic: 5 drivers of housing in 2015

Here are CoreLogic’s five facts and predictions for 2015:

1. Millennials will start buying

The young Generation Y experienced a strong boost in job growth that will help spur housing in 2015. Millennials posted a 3% improvement in employment growth, which is one percentage point higher than the overall employment growth rate.

“While part of the improvement is the demographic transition of Millennials as they age, it is still very good news, because this age cohort is the key first-time homebuyer segment,” the report said.

2. Oil price drops will benefit housing

“Households in the U.S. spend more than $1,800 on energy-related costs annually and 22% of that energy consumption is due to residential real estate,” CoreLogic said. “So while the drop in oil prices has typically been linked to a reduction in driving-related expenses, it clearly also reduces energy-related expenses for residential real estate.”

3. Home price growth will remain muted

Home prices growth is forecasted to be fairly muted going forward as mortgage rates continue to hover around 4%.

“While rates are still very low, home prices are not. It is clear that the low-rate environment has benefited home prices, as price-to-income and price-to-rent ratios are high,” CoreLogic said.

4. Houston will be the most interesting housing market to watch

Houston continues to thrive thanks to its strong energy market and household growth over the past few years.

5. Housing demand will jump

Overall sales are projected to increase to 5.8 million in 2015, up 9% from 5.3 million in 2014, while total housing starts are expected to reach 1.1 million in 2015, a 14% year-over-year increase.

However, this is still 23% below the 1.45 million average seen over the last 50 or more years.

The 30-year fixed mortgage rate is only expected to rise to 4.3%, up from 4.2% in 2014.

“Overall, the economy finally appears to be gaining enough momentum to help provide the support that the housing market has needed for stronger recovery. The combination of stronger employment growth and especially millennial job growth makes for solid footing for the real estate market,” the report said.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 102 Comments

NJ Economic Year in Review

From the Record:

New Jersey’s economic ups and downs in 2014

There was a bit more optimism regarding the New Jersey economy as 2014 came to a close, with job growth improving; more disposable income helping boost retail sales; the industrial side of commercial real estate strengthening; and housing continuing its recovery — though more unevenly than expected. There was even renewed interest in mergers and acquisitions.

At the same time, the casino industry’s implosion in Atlantic City accelerated; more corporations left, or weighed leaving, the Garden State; and the state didn’t get the pot of gold anticipated from hosting the Super Bowl.

New Jersey awarded $2 billion in corporate incentives in the last year for projects that state officials said would create 14,600 jobs and keep 20,000 more from leaving the state.

Yet as the year winds down, the state’s economic rebound trails that of the nation and neighboring states, and New Jersey jobs are in short supply.

North Jersey’s commercial real estate market roared back this year, with the industrial and multifamily sectors remarkably strong. Investors and capital, from New York City and around the globe, were attracted to properties in the Garden State, where macro trends are helping to boost the market.

Despite New Jersey’s attempt to keep businesses in the state, Bergen and Passaic counties lost some big corporate citizens this year. And more major company exits may be looming.

The retail business continued to reinvent itself in 2014, in North Jersey and around the world.

The housing market in New Jersey and nationwide continued to climb out of its worst downturn since the Depression in 2014, but the progress was uneven. Homebuilding was up, spurred by strong rental construction; but the number of home sales dropped from 2013’s pace, as households continued to face the difficult realities of flat incomes and tight mortgage standards.

Home prices rose, but at a tepid pace. And New Jersey led the nation in foreclosure activity, as lenders dealt with a backlog of distressed loans that built up after a near-freeze of foreclosures in the state prompted by questions about mortgage industry practices.

Rarely has a New Jersey industry declined as fast as the Atlantic City casino sector in 2014.

The closure of four of the city’s 12 casinos this year at a loss of nearly a quarter of the state’s casino jobs — 7,433 since the start of the year, according to the state Division of Gaming Enforcement — has debilitated a once key state industry, and badly hurt the economy in the southern part of the state.

While consumer mortgage lending slowed, lending to businesses picked up this year, especially for those banks that serve New Jersey towns and cities closest to Manhattan, where high rents have spurred commercial building and multifamily construction and renovation work in commuter towns.

Posted in Economics, Employment, Housing Recovery, New Jersey Real Estate | 73 Comments

The real reason Millennials aren’t buying houses (or are buying later)

From the NYT:

For Many Millenials, Children Are Out of Reach

Millennials are taking their time procreating. According to C.D.C. data, preliminary 2013 birthrates show that the birth rates for teenagers declined 10 percent in 2013, to a historic low of 26.6 births per 1,000 women. The birth rate also declined for women in their 20s to a record low, while births to women in their 30s and 40s rose. This is not because millennials are stuck in a state of perpetual adolescence and unwilling to make the sacrifice that children entail. On the contrary: putting off children is one of the most financially responsible decisions that a young person can make.

Raising children has never been cheap. But one cost that has skyrocketed over the past couple decades is child care. After adjusting for inflation, the Census Bureau found that families spent $84 per week on child care in 1985, compared with $143 per week in 2011. The cost of child care, like most other costs, is harder to manage for the poor. Families below the poverty level spent about 30 percent of their income on child care, compared with about 8 percent for families above the poverty level. Unsurprisingly, families with young children spent a higher proportion of their income on child care — about 11 percent.

More than 20 percent of millennials with only a high school education are living in poverty, and research has shown that persistent poverty has an impact on young children’s cognitive development. College-educated millennials are swimming in loan debt — two-thirds of them have debt, and the average debt is $27,000 (up from a $15,000 average debt 20 years ago). Millennials, like most groups of millions of people, are rational actors. They just don’t want to have kids they can’t afford.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Housing Recovery | 51 Comments

Who benefits from the MID?

From MarketWatch:

Why the mortgage tax break isn’t helping many taxpayers

For generations of U.S. homeowners, the tax deduction on mortgage interest has been a sacrosanct loophole that no one in Congress dare touch.

But the collapse in interest rates is producing a bizarre and, so far, underappreciated result. It is making that loophole less and less valuable.

Indeed, for growing numbers of homeowners the loophole is now almost completely worthless. The mortgage-interest deduction is no longer a middle-class tax break. It is becoming an increasingly regressive break that is aimed mostly at the upper classes.

This math is new. As recently as 2008, 30-year mortgage rates were over 6%. In early 2000 they were north of 8%, and back in the early 1980s they were in double digits. Back then people were paying a lot of interest, and the deduction was really valuable.

I’m not a political fan of this deduction. It makes no sense. It’s regressive and drives up home prices. The only justification, which is slim, is that it’s one of the few tax loopholes that have benefited middle-class people and not just the connected or the very wealthy.

But for millions of people, the tax benefits are now virtually nil.

Posted in Mortgages, National Real Estate, Politics | 8 Comments

NJ gains population, retains 11th spot

From the Star Ledger:

N.J. gains almost 27,000 residents as Virginia closes population gap

New Jersey gained almost 27,000 residents in the last year, retaining its ranking as the 11th most populous state.

New Jersey was home to 8,938,175 people as of July 1, up 26,673 from July 1, 2013, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates released today.

The state remained ahead of No. 12-ranked Virginia, which gained more than twice as many people, 55,944, and had a population of 8,326,289.

Across the Hudson River, neighboring New York, once the nation’s most populous state, fell to No. 4 behind Florida.

As of July 1, Florida was home to 19.9 million people compared with 19.7 million for New York. The Sunshine State grew by 293,000 while New York added 51,000 people during that period.

California and Texas still occupied the top two spots.

The remainder of the top 10: Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina and Michigan.

Six states lost population: Illinois, West Virginia, Connecticut, New Mexico, Alaska and Vermont.

Posted in Demographics, Economics | 54 Comments