August Otteau Report

From the Otteau Group:

Home Purchases Accelerating

Home purchase demand continues to rise in New Jersey where purchase-contracts increased in August by 29% y-o-y for the 11th consecutive month. Going back to May 2011, housing demand has increased in 15-of-16 months. The improvement comes as a result of lower home prices and mortgage rates, increased buyer confidence and an extremely favorable rent-to-own comparison. YTD purchase contracts in New Jersey have risen 24%, to the highest level since 2007. Even more impressive is that the 2012 sales pace is 11% above the 2010 pace, which benefitted from homebuyer tax credits at that time.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, New Jersey Real Estate | 102 Comments

August contracts down nationally, but up in the Northeast

From the NAR:

Pending Home Sales Decline in August

After reaching a two-year peak, pending home sales fell in August but are at elevated levels compared with a year ago, according to the National Association of Realtors®.

The Pending Home Sales Index,* a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, declined 2.6 percent to 99.2 in August from an upwardly revised 101.9 in July but is 10.7 percent above August 2011 when it was 89.6. The data reflect contracts but not closings.

Contract activity in July 2012 was at the highest level since April 2010 when buyers were rushing to beat the deadline for the home buyer tax credit.

“The index shows 16 consecutive months of year-over-year increases, and that has translated into a higher number of closed sales. Year-to-date existing-home sales are 9 percent above the same period last year, but sales were relatively flat from 2008 through 2011,” Yun added.

Existing-home sales this year are expected to rise 9 percent to 4.64 million, and gain another 8 percent in 2013 to nearly 5.02 million. With generally balanced inventory conditions in many areas, the median existing-home price is projected to rise about 5 percent in both 2012 and 2013.

The PHSI in the Northeast rose 0.9 percent to 78.2 in August and is 19.9 percent above August 2011. In the Midwest the index declined 2.6 percent to 95.0 in August but is also 19.9 percent higher than a year ago. Pending home sales in the South slipped 1.1 percent to an index of 110.4 in August but are 13.2 percent above August 2011. With broad inventory shortages in the West, the index fell 7.2 percent in August to 102.5 and is 4.2 percent below a year ago.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 139 Comments

Dems pound Christie on HomeKeeper mismanagement

From the Record:

Democrats say NJ’s foreclosure prevention program falls short

The state’s main foreclosure prevention effort – the HomeKeeper program – has used less than 10 percent of its federal funding since it was started in May 2011, drawing criticism that it is doing too little to help struggling homeowners.

A state official acknowledged the shortcomings, and said he has taken steps to improve HomeKeeper by adding staff and expanding homeowners’ eligibility.

The HomeKeeper program, which is funded with $300 million in federal money, makes zero-interest loans to help unemployed homeowners pay their mortgages. The program’s most recent quarterly report says it assisted 498 homeowners and rejected almost 2,000 requests for help from May 2011 through June 2012.

U.S. Sens. Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez, both Democrats, say that record needs to improve. In a letter sent Wednesday to the state Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency, they cited U.S. Treasury figures showing that the HomeKeeper program had used only $22.5 million of its funding as of Aug. 31.

“It is unconscionable that approximately $270 million in federal funds has been sitting unspent for two years,” said the letter.

A letter to the HMFA from the U.S. Treasury in May also criticized HomeKeeper, saying the program was taking more than six months to process applications.

“New Jersey consistently lags well behind other states on key measures,” the Treasury said, calling on the state to “take immediate action to improve its performance.”

A spokeswoman for the DCA did not dispute the Treasury’s figures on how much funding has been used by HomeKeeper. But she said that the loans are paid over time, and that HomeKeeper has already committed $46 million to homeowners who have been approved for loans. That’s the amount that would be paid if all the approved homeowners use the maximum loan amount of $48,000.

Two state assemblymen also raised questions about HomeKeeper’s performance this week and said they plan to hold hearings on the program.

“The list is long – and growing – of people in desperate need of assistance,” said Assemblyman Gary Schaer, D-Passaic. “Something is just not working the way it should be.”

The question of whether the state has done enough to help troubled homeowners erupted into a testy exchange earlier this week between Governor Christie and a television reporter who asked him about HomeKeeper. Christie told the reporter that the program had been delayed because of a legal moratorium that held up most foreclosure activity in the state throughout 2011, after reports of documentation abuses by mortgage servicers. When the reporter tried to ask follow-up questions, Christie cut him off and told him to “get your facts correct.”

However, there does not appear to be any connection between the moratorium and problems with HomeKeeper. The Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency has never cited the moratorium as a reason for HomeKeeper delays when the agency answered earlier questions from Menendez and Lautenberg. The governor’s office did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

And many struggling homeowners sought help from the HomeKeeper program and were turned away, during the foreclosure moratorium, said Arnold Cohen of the Housing and Community Development Network, a group of organizations that promote affordable housing.

Posted in Economics, Employment, Foreclosures, New Jersey Real Estate | 141 Comments

Those peaks look far, far away

From CNN/Money:

Home prices may not return to peak until 2023

Home prices are showing signs of life, but have a long way to go to make up for losses from the housing bust.

U.S. home prices dropped by a third from the start of 2007 to the start of 2012, according to Fiserv, an analytics firm.

Fiserv forecasts prices will bounce back an average of 3.7% a year for the next five years — a rate that would still leave prices 20% below the peak. At that forecasted growth rate, the national average high of $238,000 would not be hit again until 2023.

It could take even longer in some areas. “In some hard-hit markets, prices could take decades to recover,” said Fiserv economist David Stiff.

Among those facing a long haul: Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada, the states most caught up in the speculative feeding frenzy of the mid-2000s.

Homeowners in Nevada may have to wait the longest to make up lost ground. Home prices in the state plunged nearly 60%, and Fiserv projects annual gains of just 2.3%. It would take some 40 years at that pace to get back to 2007 levels.

Real estate, of course, is local, and there are many housing markets that never bubbled during the boom. In those places, buyers who bought in 2007 are much more likely to be in the money today. In South Dakota, Texas and West Virginia, prices are already slightly higher than they were five years ago.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 263 Comments

Case Shiller & FHFA Home Price Indicies out this morning

From CNBC:

Housing Recovery Should Show Up in Prices

Real estate price data Tuesday should confirm that housing continued to stabilize this summer, even as the rest of the economy remained tepid.

The S&P/Case Shiller home price index is expected to be up one percent for July, when it is released at 9 a.m. ET. The FHFA home price index, released at 10 a.m., is expected to show a 0.7 percent gain in housing prices in July. The data follows on reports last week that showed housing sales were stronger than expected in August, rising 7.8 percent, and home builders sentiment jumped to a six-year high.

“It will probably be pretty strong, just because the mix is starting to work in their favor,” said Mesirow Financial chief economist Diane Swonk of the Case Shiller data. She said there were fewer foreclosures in July’s sales so the prices overall should be higher.

Housing data has pointed to a steady recovery, though at a still low rate of activity.

“We’re seeing more expensive houses in the mix, less distressed sales,” Swonk said. “Headlines have an impact on confidence.”

Homeowners’ equity increased over the last couple of quarters, as housing prices improved. The Fed’s latest data showed that homeowners’ equity increased to $864 billion in the second quarter, from the fourth quarter of 2011. LaVorgna said, in a note, that this improvement has lifted owners’ equity as a share of total real estate from 41.6 percent to 43.1 percent. The peak of owners’ equity share was 61.2 percent in the first quarter, 2001, and it fell to a record low of 37.2 percent in first quarter, 2009, he added.

Moody’s Economy.com chief economist Mark Zandi said housing is one factor that affects confidence, but not the main one. “It’s jobs, it’s gasoline prices. Stock prices are important,” he said. “ I think on the margin it’s starting to help. I think people are feeling better about their home. They know at least it’s not falling in value, and that’s a big step forward.”

Zandi also said the July period should show good price improvements, since the number of distressed sales was lower. However, he expects to see another wave of distressed sales coming, and that could impact prices in the winter season, when there are normally fewer sales. He said there are three million loans in foreclosure or seriously delinquent, in a pool of 49.5 million loans outstanding.

Gary Thayer, chief macro strategist at Wells Fargo Advisors, said the housing recovery is important, and especially now. “It’s coming at a good time,” he said. “In the past couple of years, there was some strength in manufacturing. The United States seemed to be starting to recover but more recently this year with the recession in Europe, we’re seeing some decline in orders. I think that’s creating some serious headwinds for our economy, and it’s good the housing market is doing its part to support economic growth.”

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 212 Comments

Are we expecting too much, too soon?

From the NY Post:

Jersey’s hangover

Earlier this year, Gov. Chris Christie declared that New Jersey’s comeback had begun. Since then, the state’s unemployment rate has risen and tax collections have slowed. Last week, Standard & Poor’s revised its outlook on the state’s credit rating from stable to negative.

The governor’s critics have been quick to declare that his agenda of austerity and reform isn’t working. But Christie’s biggest mistake has been to raise expectations so quickly in a state hamstrung by more than a decade of gross fiscal mismanagement and bad economic policy.

Christie has done much to set Jersey in the right direction, but he has much more he needs to do before a true Jersey comeback emerges.

After all, Jersey hadn’t legitimately balanced its books in more than a decade. Instead, the state consistently spent more than it took in, while relying on gimmicks like borrowing to pay its bills. The impact of those gimmicks continues to haunt the budget.

For one thing, the state didn’t pay its pension bill for years. Since 2001, it has allotted just $3.7 billion out of its budget for pensions, when its own pension experts say it should’ve put in about $27 billion.

Lawmakers also drained the state’s unemployment trust fund to keep growing the budget, forcing the state to take a $2 billion loan from the feds once unemployment began rising in 2008 — more debt the state must now repay.

But now Christie has passed three budgets without raising taxes and held down the rate of spending increases despite the past gimmicks the state is now forced to pay off. He’s also signed into law pension reform that begins to dig the state out of its retirement-fund mess, easily one of the nation’s worst.

Perhaps most encouraging is that in the last 12 months, Jersey had added about 60,000 jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Jersey hadn’t added that many jobs in any year since 1999.

But New Jersey is nowhere near out of the woods. The state desperately needs to cut its sky-high taxes to attract investment. Yet there’s little room to do that now.

The state faces still-growing pension costs thanks to the years of mismanagement. Just getting back to proper levels of payments into the pension systems will gobble up a big chunk of any increase in tax collections as the economy recovers. The annual bill for paying off the 1998 pension borrowing, meanwhile, will jump in a few years to $500 million.

Given Jersey’s challenges (and the nation’s), Christie would’ve been wiser to tell the state’s residents that much has been achieved, but much needs still needs to be done.

As Christie well knows, most voters in the state just want officials to be candid with them now about the task at hand.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate, Politics | 97 Comments

Romney housing plan still short of specifics

From the Huffington Post:

Mitt Romney Housing Plan Short On Details (Again)

If elected president, Mitt Romney would reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, sell 200,000 vacant foreclosed homes owned by the government and promote “sensible, not overly complex” financial regulation that gets credit flowing again.

He would also “spare thousands of families from going through the foreclosure process” by making foreclosure alternatives easier.

How would he go about doing this? As with an abridged version of the plan that appeared on the campaign website a few weeks ago, this seven-page white paper (including the title page) called “Securing the American Dream and the Future of Housing Policy” includes no details.

From Slate:

Mitt Romney’s Laughably Vacuous Plan To End “Too Big To Fail”

The economic policy failures of the Obama administration are real enough, especially in terms of how they’ve dealt with housing and foreclosure policies, so it was a little surprising to me that Mitt Romney released a new housing policy document during the Friday afternoon news dump period.

But when you read the plan, their motivation gets clearer. This for example is just embarassing:

End “Too-Big-To-Fail” And Reform Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac: The Romney-Ryan plan will completely end “too-big-to-fail” by reforming the GSEs. The four years sincetaxpayers took over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, spending $140 billion in the process, is toolong to wait for reform. Rather than just talk about reform, a Romney-Ryan Administration will protect taxpayers from additional risk in the future by reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Macand provide a long-term, sustainable solution for the future of housing finance reform in our country.

The idea of “ending” “too-big-to-fail” is a great political slogan since it’s super-popular and nobody’s ever quite sure what it means. But there’s no possible meaning under which this makes sense. Back in 2008, the feeling among leaders in both parties was that if something terrible happened to Citi or JP Morgan or Bank of America or Goldman Sachs the best policy response was to inject new public money into the capital structure rather than liquidate the enterprise. If in 2018 the same thing happens again is something different going to happen?

From Business Insider:
Mitt Romney’s Housing Plan Has Got To Be A Joke

At this point, we have no choice but to conclude that the Mitt Romney campaign is just trolling whiny journalists who have complained about the lack of detail in his plans.

Yesterday evening (a Friday evening!) the campaign revealed a white paper titled Securing the American Dream and The Future of Housing Policy that’s so unsubstantial, we half-suspect the timing was done so that nobody would see it amid the release of the 2011 tax documents, which came out about 20 minutes earlier.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, Politics | 47 Comments

Who to blame? Christie or the Survey?

From the Daily Record:

Why is the NJ unemployment rate rising while the state gains jobs?

Another increase in New Jersey’s unemployment rate — this time to 9.9 percent — prompted the Christie administration Thursday to wonder aloud if there was something wrong with the survey itself.

Charles Steindel, chief economist for the state Department of Treasury, said the jobless rate told a story that was 180-degrees different from another survey that showed the state added 5,300 jobs in August.

If the unemployment rate is accurate, “this would mean we were losing 600 jobs a day in August, including weekends,” Steindel said in a conference call with reporters. “It didn’t happen.”

Steindel’s comments came after the monthly jobs report showed New Jersey posted both an increase in jobs and an increase in the unemployment rate.

Casting blame on the survey takers is risky, analysts said. What happens next month, for example, if the same survey shows that the unemployment rate declined?

“It is curious that such concerns are raised only when someone objects to the data,” said Patrick J. O’Keefe, director of economic research for J.H. Cohn, a Roseland-based accounting firm.

From NJ Spotlight:

Unemployment Rate Rises for Fifth Straight Month

With New Jersey’s unemployment rate rising to a new 35-year high of 9.9 percent, the Christie administration yesterday took aim at the methodology used to determine the rate, saying there is clearly something awry with the nationwide household survey used to come up with the numbers.

New Jersey Still a Long Way from Recovery, Report Shows
Charles Steindel, the Treasury Department’s chief economist, said the increase in New Jersey’s jobless rate from 9.0 percent to 9.9 percent over the past five months is contradicted by employer surveys showing a gain of 50,000 jobs over the past year. Administration officials noted that New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Connecticut labor officials also have questioned the validity of the unemployment rate calculations.

Gov. Chris Christie and administration officials insisted that the state is enjoying healthy job growth, despite yesterday’s announcement that the jobless rate rose from 9.8 percent in July to 9.9 percent in August, while the national unemployment rate dropped from 8.2 percent to 8.1 percent

The Republican governor said that his administration has added 86,200 jobs since he took office in January 2010, making up one -hird of the jobs lost under his predecessor, Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine, during the 19-month recession that ended in June 2009.

“Keep the big picture in mind,” Christie spokesman Kevin Roberts urged. “New Jersey added 5,300 total jobs in August, giving New Jersey positive job growth in 10 of the last 12 months. “

Steindel said it’s “nuts” to believe that unemployment has been going up in New Jersey. “We’re not seeing unemployment claims shoot up like we did at the beginning of the recession,” he said in a conference call with reporters.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 166 Comments

Appears that the bottom is now behind us

From the WSJ:

The Housing Recovery Keeps Rolling Along.

August existing-home sales and construction of single-family homes jumped to the highest level in more than two years. Meanwhile, a separate report showed housing starts in August rose 2.3% on a month-over-month basis.

The data — which come one day after confidence among U.S. home builders jumped to the highest level in more than six years – point to continued signs of an improving housing market.

Existing-home sales are now back at levels last seen in May 2010, when first-time homebuyers were rushing to qualify for a government tax credit. As the chart from Credit Suisse shows, home sales still have a long way to go before reverting back toward pre-crisis levels. But for now, the momentum appears to be moving in the right direction.

“This may be the most promising existing home sales report in five years,” wrote economists at IHS Global Insight. “Fundamentals — an improving economy, low interest rates, and, possibly, a drop in the cancellation rate — appear to be the driving force behind August’s strong and broad-based gains.”

To be sure, there are still reasons to stay cautious about the recent recovery in housing data.

Steven Wood, chief economist at Insight Economics, points out there are still plenty of distressed properties on the market and “a substantial shadow inventory of unsold homes.” He notes the slow recovery hasn’t gained much traction considering how much damage was done throughout the crisis.

But all in all, strategists and economists seem to be getting more upbeat that the housing recovery is for real.

“The pieces for a more sustainable housing sector recovery are now falling into place,” says Millan Mulraine, an economist at TD Securities.

From Forbes:

Housing Recovery? Starts And Sales Of Existing Units Hit Two-Year Highs

The housing market has been one of the key factors that’s been absent in the broader, albeit tepid, U.S. economic recovery. Recent data suggests residential real estate is on its way to a gradual recovery, as Wednesday’s single family home starts and used home sales showed, which hit their highest levels in more than two years. This may be the beginning of a gradual, and difficult, recovery for what was the epicenter of the global financial crisis.

The last time the housing market seemed to be in recovery mode was back in mid-2010, after the first-time homebuyer tax credit boosted demand for homes. Ever since then, most of the chatter has been about a double-dip in prices, a massive buildup of inventories, and a lurking shadow inventory.

A solid rebound in housing markets is by no means around the corner. As mentioned above, the shadow inventory looms and inventories are still relatively large. Investors have difficulty accessing credit, despite Bernanke’s best efforts to lower mortgage rates via QE3, and consumers are in the midst of a cycle of deleveraging. If this is truly the beginning of the housing recovery, investors can expect a gradual and difficult climb that will last several years. Still, the market seems to have bottomed.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 108 Comments

Hey Christie – How about focusing a little bit on NJ now?

From Bloomberg:

New Jersey Housing Suffers as Defaults Exceed Nevada: Mortgages

New Jersey’s judicial review of all foreclosures, which delays seizures to help borrowers, threatens to hold down prices for years as properties remain subject to repossession and then may be sold at a discount. That’s buffeting a housing market already hurt by unemployment that’s risen to a 35-year high.

The state passed Nevada in the second quarter in the rate of homeowners with seriously delinquent loans — those 90 days late or in foreclosure — according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Only Florida had a higher rate of serious delinquencies, and that fell 1.2 percentage points from a year earlier to 17.5 percent of mortgages. In comparison, New Jersey’s rose 1.3 percentage points to 12.7 percent.

While home values increased in July from a year earlier in 42 states, New Jersey prices fell 0.8 percent, according to CoreLogic (CLGX), a real estate services company based in Santa Ana, California.

“Housing is an albatross around New Jersey’s economy, which is one of the weakest in the country,” Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics Inc. in West Chester, Pennsylvania, said in an e-mail.

From the Philly Inquirer:

S&P downgrades N.J.’s economic outlook to ‘negative’

Budget analysts and credit rating agencies continue to cast doubt on a “Jersey Comeback.”

On Tuesday, Standard & Poor’s became the third credit agency within days to warn that New Jersey’s $31.7 billion budget, which went into effect July 1, is based on overly optimistic revenue projections. It depends on expected revenue growth of nearly 8 percent, more than twice the rate of the previous year.

The Christie administration itself is presenting a muted economic forecast to investors, a far cry from the governor’s months of touting the state’s economic “comeback,” a slogan he recently abandoned.

While two other rating agencies, Moody’s and Fitch, last week deemed the state’s economic outlook “stable,” S&P downgraded it to “negative.” It cited the revenue assumptions; reliance on one-shot measures, such as the clean energy fund, to plug budget holes; and longer-term economic pressures.

Both Moody’s and Fitch expressed concern that despite the state’s relatively wealthy population and diverse economy, New Jersey has lagged behind the nation in recovery and its budget remains structurally unbalanced.

From the Record:

NY Fed chief cites slow N.J. recovery

The president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York told an audience of students, corporate executives and college officials at Montclair State University Tuesday that New Jersey’s economy is improving – albeit at a moderate pace.

President Bill Dudley, said the Fed’s move to spend $40 billion a month on mortgage bonds, which he voted for, was necessary given the slow advances in economic growth nationally.

Without further action from the Fed, he said, growth would be too weak to “make big inroads into the spare capacity” of labor and industrial production, and wouldn’t boost employment or business spending.

“I believe that a nudge in the right direction will move us will move us closer to a self-reinforcing cycle of more hiring, more spending, more growth and more investment,” he said.

In New Jersey, he said, the economic recovery is struggling from the impact of the continuing housing slump and the excessive debt burden that people are carrying.

Although there are signs that housing prices are starting to “firm,” there has been little recovery in the construction industry, and the percentage of mortgage debt in New Jersey that is 90-days delinquent – 9.3 percent in June – is three percentage points higher than the national rate, Dudley said.

“Things are improving, not as fast as we’d like,” he said. “There is still a lot of stress on New Jersey families.” As of the second quarter of 2012, the average debt per person was about $63,000, “roughly unchanged over the past several years,” he said.”Delinquency rates on that debt are high,” he said, adding that “8.4 percent of all debt in the state is seriously delinquent, up from 7.4 percent in 2011.” That’s well above the national rate of 6.7 percent, he said, adding that “many New Jersey households are still struggling with their finances.”

Posted in Economics, Employment, Foreclosures, New Jersey Real Estate | 144 Comments

Many borrowers locked out of lower rate mortgages

From the LA Times:

Two-thirds of Americans with mortgages pay 5% interest or higher

US. interest rates are at rock-bottom levels, but that’s not helping most Americans with mortgages. And those high-cost loans remain a big drag on the economy, experts say.

Roughly 69% of American homeowners with mortgages at the end of the second quarter had rates of 5% or higher and about 33% of them had rates above 6%, according to detailed mortgage data provided to The Times by Santa Ana research firm CoreLogic.

Meanwhile, the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage has been below 4% every week but one this year, and the average 15-year fixed-rate mortgage, popular among buyers looking to refinance, has been below 3% since the last week in May, according to Freddie Mac.

Several factors may be keeping homeowners from securing lower mortgage rates, economists said, including battered credit, insufficient income, stricter lending standards and the costs of refinancing.

But a major aftershock from the housing crisis itself also remains a big stumbling block: the significant chunk of homeowners who are underwater and unable to get new loans.

For underwater borrowers — those who owe more than their homes would bring if sold — the CoreLogic data showed that 84% had loans with interest rates above 5%. Half of underwater borrowers had interest rates above 6% at the end of the second quarter.

Economists and policymakers see a big opportunity, arguing that getting borrowers into lower-cost loans would be an effective way of stimulating the economy — freeing up some income for those who are probably struggling the most to pay their mortgages. Refinancing could also help underwater borrowers by allowing them to plow more cash back into their homes and reduce principal.

To that end, the Federal Reserve last week unveiled big new steps to further push down mortgage interest rates and spur the housing market.

The vast majority of borrowers with negative equity, about 84.9%, continued to pay their mortgages in the second quarter, CoreLogic reported last week.

Nevertheless, underwater loans remain an obstinate barrier to economic growth because people who remain stuck in their homes are often unable to pursue new jobs and other opportunities elsewhere. These borrowers are also higher risks for foreclosure.

Helping spur mass refinancing with new government policies would not only help underwater households but also get the economy moving again, economists say.

“It has very strong macroeconomic effects,” said Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist and professor at Columbia University. “The irony is the people who need the help the most have not been helped — the people who are underwater.”

Changes this year to the Home Affordable Refinance Program for underwater borrowers with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans have led to a 95% increase in participation in the program through the first half of the year.

Stiglitz is supporting legislation by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) that would expand refinancing to borrowers who have privately owned mortgages.

Other Senate bills also aimed at expanding refinancing opportunities and reducing costs are being sponsored by Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Robert Menendez (D-N.J.).

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, Mortgages, National Real Estate | 193 Comments

Inept banks blamed for poor HAMP performance

From the Huffington Post:

Banks’ Disorganization Pushed 800,000 Homeowners Into Unnecessary Foreclosure: ProPublica

Over the past several years, we’ve reported extensively on the big banks’ foreclosure failings. As a result of banks’ disorganization and understaffing — particularly at the peak of the crisis in 2009 and 2010 — homeowners were often forced to run a gauntlet of confusion, delays, and errors when seeking a mortgage modification.

But while evidence of these problems was pervasive, it was always hard to quantify the damage. Just how many more people could have qualified under the administration’s mortgage modification program if the banks had done a better job? In other words, how many people have been pushed toward foreclosure unnecessarily?

A thorough study released last week provides one number, and it’s a big one: about 800,000 homeowners.

The study’s authors — from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the government’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Ohio State University, Columbia Business School, and the University of Chicago — arrived at this conclusion by analyzing a vast data set available to the OCC. They wanted to measure the impact of HAMP, the government’s main foreclosure prevention program.

What they found was that certain banks were far better at modifying loans than others. The reasons for the difference, they established, were pretty predictable: The banks that were better at helping homeowners avoid foreclosure had staff who were both more numerous and better trained.

Unfortunately for homeowners, most mortgages are handled by banks that haven’t been properly staffed and thus have modified far fewer loans. If these worse-performing banks had simply modified loans at the same pace as their better performing peers, then HAMP would have produced about 800,000 more modifications. Instead of about 1.2 million modifications by the end of this year, HAMP would have resulted in about 2 million.

Posted in Foreclosures, Mortgages, National Real Estate, Risky Lending | 111 Comments

White House shows support for HARP 3

From the White House Blog:

Infographic: The Plan to Help Homeowners Refinance

Congress is currently considering a plan that would help millions of responsible homeowners save hundreds of dollars each month by refinancing their mortgages.

The plan to expand access to refinancing is simple: make it easier for millions of responsible homeowners with mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to take advantage of historically low interest rates, even if they are underwater, as long as they are current on their payments. The proposal would establish a quick and hassle-free process—no more tax forms, and no more appraisals—just a lower interest rate, and lower payments each month.

Posted in Housing Recovery, Mortgages, Politics | 120 Comments

Increased cancelations – Big deal or not?

From HousingWire:

15% of home sales fail: Capital Economics

Many parties are forming real estate deals only to watch their transactions fall through before the closing date, Paul Diggle, a property economist with Capital Economics, said Thursday.

Diggle released a note saying “it’s obviously not good that 15% or more of all contracted home sales aren’t making it through to closing.”

Using data from the National Association of Realtors, he found that pending home sales rose 6.9% from December to July while actual closings were up only 2.1%.

If both indexes had risen together, it would suggest a more seamless move through the entire real estate transaction.

Part of the difference may be attributed to NAR’s existing home sales index using a larger survey sample than the pending home sales index, Capital Economics said.

“But we suspect that the bulk of the divergence reflects the fact that cancellation rates have increased,” Diggle wrote. “And this divergence creates problems in a market that is struggling to recover.”

Diggle says the escrow period has become more challenging for buyers and sellers who find themselves wrangling with financing, home inspections and title report issues.

“Escrow allows buyers or sellers who run into problems with any of these steps to withdraw from a sale at a relatively low cost,” he explained.

Diggle says rising cancellation rates are likely to keep the housing recovery “relatively muted.” The good news is more buyers are considering sales, but the divergence between initial contracts and closings could suggest falling home prices lie ahead.

Posted in Economics, Housing Recovery, National Real Estate | 237 Comments

Foreclosures up, but still at a very low level

From the Philly Inquirer:


Foreclosure filings up in Pa., N.J., other states

States that process home foreclosures through the courts, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey, experienced an increase in filings in August over July’s levels, RealtyTrac, which tracks foreclosures nationwide, reported Thursday.

Nationally, the foreclosure-filing rate rose 1 percent from July to August but was down 15 percent from August 2011, RealtyTrac said.

Yet in judicial-foreclosure states, “deferred activity boiled over,” said Daren Blomquist, vice president of RealtyTrac. “This was a continuation of a trend we’ve been seeing for several months now.”

Twenty states registered year-over-year increases in foreclosure activity.

In Pennsylvania, new foreclosures increased 129 percent from August 2011, while in New Jersey they increased 101 percent. On the distressed-housing list of 50 states, they were ranked 27 and 32, respectively.

Filings in both states were below the national average of one in 681 houses, with Pennsylvania at one in 1,194 and New Jersey at one in 1,461.

Sales of houses repossessed by banks through foreclosure fell in most states. Pennsylvania had 43 percent fewer sales in August than in 2011.

Recently, many lenders have been trying to avoid the expensive and lengthy foreclosure process by making short sales, those in which banks accept prices less than what is owed on the mortgages.

RealtyTrac data show short sales in the first quarter at a three-year high, and 25 percent above levels for the same three months of 2011.

Posted in Foreclosures, New Jersey Real Estate | 191 Comments