Senate says “F*ck You New Jersey” and proceeds to piss all over us

From the Star Ledger:

Senate GOP bill delivers bigger blow to N.J. by killing your entire property tax break

The entire federal deduction for state and local taxes — an important tax break for New Jersey residents — would end under legislation proposed Thursday by Senate Republicans.

The Senate Finance Committee measure goes even further than the House, where Republican leaders agreed to keep a property tax deduction of up to $10,000 while eliminating the break for state and local income and sales taxes.

In both cases, however, Republicans have decided to target a tax break used disproportionately by New Jersey and other high-tax states, most of them governed by Democrats, in order to fund tax cuts for the rest of the country.

“New Jerseyans can’t afford to subsidize the rest of America more than we already do, and it is up to every member of Congress from New Jersey to put party aside and defeat this morally bankrupt bill before it bankrupts our future,” said U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., a member of the finance committee.

More than 41 percent of New Jersey taxpayers take the deduction, according to the Tax Foundation, and 84 percent of those deducting their state and local taxes earn less than $200,000 a year, according to New Jersey Policy Perspective, a progressive research group.

Not only would state taxpayers lose a key deduction, but New Jersey would find it harder to raise taxes to make up for any federal budget cuts, said Jon Whiten, vice president of New Jersey Policy Perspective.

“Eliminating these deductions would harm millions of New Jersey families while squeezing the state at both ends,” Whiten said.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 159 Comments

Vancouver tops NYC and SF for least affordable

From HousingWire:

New study reveals least affordable city in North America

Home prices are out of control in markets such as San Francisco and Manhattan, which have the lowest levels of affordability in the U.S., however other cities in North America are still less affordable.

A new study, The International Housing Affordability Survey conducted by Point2Homes, shows the least affordable market in North America is located in Canada. The least affordable market in North America is Vancouver, Canada, where the median home sales price is more than $1.1 million and the median family income is only $63,944.

Vancouver’s affordability crisis was fueled by foreign investments in the real estate sector, according to an article by Minh Uong for The New York Times. Now, Vancouver has risen to one of the least affordable housing markets in the world.

The second least affordable market in North America is Manhattan, homes are even more expensive than Vancouver at $1.2 million, however the median income is higher at $77,559.

San Francisco came in as the third least affordable market in North America, and the second least affordable in the U.S. It’s median home price is the highest in North America at nearly $1.3 million, but is also holds the highest median income in the U.S. at $92,094.

The chart below shows how many years it would take to pay off a median priced home if borrowers paid 100% of the area’s median income toward the mortgage for major North American cities.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, Detroit came in as the most affordable city as median income borrowers could pay off their median priced home in just 1.8 years if they dedicated all their income toward their home.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, National Real Estate | 100 Comments

An outsider gets his chance

From Politico:

Murphy defeats Guadagno to become New Jersey’s next governor

Democrat Phil Murphy, a millionaire former Goldman Sachs executive and U.S. ambassador to Germany who’s never held elective office, will succeed Republican Chris Christie as New Jersey’s governor after defeating Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno on Tuesday.

Murphy, a progressive who grew up outside of Boston and smiled so much on the campaign trail that he was mocked for it, will bring to Trenton a sharp change in style from the combative and Jersey-born Christie, who became famous for his public fights with constituents and politicians.

Tuesday’s double-digit victory by Murphy, an unabashed liberal who supports raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour and providing free community college, means New Jersey’s government will be under full Democratic control for the first time in eight years. At the same time, it will inevitably be read as a repudiation of the deeply unpopular Christie and equally unpopular President Donald Trump.

With 99 percent of the vote counted, Murphy was leading Guadagno 56 percent to 42 percent.

He will have line-item veto power over the state’s roughly $35 billion budget and the power to name top state officials, like the attorney general, who, in many other states, are elected. But he will also confront a retirement system underfunded by billions of dollars after two decades of neglect, a deteriorating public transit system and an economy that has lagged the nation’s.

The governor-elect began his campaign with a number of pledges meant to appeal to liberal activists and public workers unions. In addition to promising free tuition at community colleges, he promised to increase protections for undocumented “dreamer” immigrants who came to the state as children and improve NJ Transit, which has been plagued by delays and outdated infrastructure.

But he’s struggled to explain how he’ll pay for his programs, promising to raise taxes by about $1.3 million — largely based on increasing the tax rates on the state’s wealthiest individuals and an anticipated $300 million in taxes sales of legalized marijuana.

The amount, however, won’t come close to covering his campaign promises.

Murphy has also floated the idea of creating a state bank modeled on the only other existing one, in North Dakota.

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 152 Comments

Who would want to win?

From Fox Business:

N.J. voters worry about taxes as they elect a new governor

New Jersey’s voters will decide Tuesday who will take over running the state from outgoing Republican Gov. Chris Christie, who, after two terms in office, is leaving Trenton with one of the lowest job-approval ratings of any U.S. governor.

The winner of the election will inherit a state facing large and expensive problems, from underfunded public pensions to crumbling transportation infrastructure, at a time when the electorate is loath to accept more tax increases. The average residential property-tax bill in New Jersey has increased 32% during the past decade, reaching $8,200 in 2016, and public polls consistently have found that the state’s voters list taxes as their top concern.

New Jersey’s financial problems are significant: Its $88.8 billion public-pension liability is 41% unfunded, and that $36.5 billion deficit will weigh on future state budgets. State funding for K-12 public schools hasn’t kept pace with a funding formula outlined in state law, infuriating education activists and putting pressure on local property taxes.

And a host of transportation challenges — financial uncertainty about construction of a new train tunnel under the Hudson River, funding and management struggles at NJ Transit, and questions regarding the replacement of the ailing Port Authority Bus Terminal in Manhattan — will require significant investment by New Jersey’s next governor.

At the same time, New Jersey’s real gross domestic product, a measure of economic strength, saw a compound annual growth rate of only 0.2% between 2006 and 2016 compared with 1.1% nationwide, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. And weighed down by pension woes, New Jersey general-obligation bonds have been downgraded 11 times across three credit-rating firms since Mr. Christie took office in 2010.

Posted in Politics | 181 Comments

Selling the tax plan through small business

From the Star Ledger:

Why a Trump Cabinet official made a weekend trip to N.J.

U.S. Small Business Administrator Linda McMahon discussed the Republican tax cut plan on a trip to New Jersey on Saturday as supporters touted the proposal as an elixir for economic growth.

On her first trip since House Republicans released their proposal, McMahon, a member of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet, was expected to meet with small-business owners in Cranford and Cinnaminson on Saturday.

It was part of her Ignite Tour, an effort to visit all 68 district offices of the Small Business Administration and talk with small business owners about how the agency can help them create jobs and improve the economy.

“I want to make sure SBA is not the best-kept secret in the country,” McMahon said. “The president’s agenda is really to grow this economy.You support small businesses because small businesses are the engine of our economy.”

This time, the discussions also included the Republican tax plan, which was officially released on Thursday and is supported by Trump.

“If they pay less tax and have more money in their pockets, they will grow their businesses,” McMahon said in an interview. “That is what every business tells me without fail: If they had more money in their pockets, they would reinvest it in their company. They want the business to be able to grow. They want to hire more people.”

While McMahon came to New Jersey, Vice President Mike Pence and Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta headed to York, Pennsylvania, on Saturday to discuss the tax bill with business owners there.

The emphasis on small businesses is this: There are 30 million small businesses, accounting for 96 percent of all businesses in the U.S., according to the SBA. They account for two of every three net new private sector jobs in the U.S.

Posted in Economics, Employment, New Jersey Real Estate, Politics | 89 Comments

How will the housing market react?

From Forbes:

What The Republican Tax Bill Means For The Value Of Your Home

House Republicans released their long awaited tax bill Thursday. The proposal is a long way from becoming the law of the land, but the draft contains some red flags for the people who build, sell and own homes—as well as for people who want to buy them.

Three changes are particularly relevant: a reduction in the amount of mortgage interest that can be deducted, a new cap on property tax deductions and limits to the capital gains exemption used by homeowners when they sell.

Real estate professionals have been quick to cry foul, arguing the proposals would eliminate the tax incentive to buy, turning America into a nation of renters and putting pressure on home values. Already the homeownership rate is near an all-time low at 63.7%, they point out. William Brown, president of the National Association of Realtors, calls the bill “nowhere near as good a deal as the one middle-class homeowners get under current law.” Some outside the industry, however, contend that in the long run the only real loser will be the industry itself.

While the median price of a house sold today is $245,000, in some expensive markets a $500,000 loan does not come close to paying for most homes. Some fear the lower cap would be particularly detrimental to first time buyers in such markets. Moreover, creating a distinction between current and future homeownership could create a disincentive to move, intensifying an already severe inventory shortage at the entry level. Increases in home values over the long term will also eat away at the value of the deduction if a plan to raise the cap over time is not put in place.

At the same time as the plan cuts back on deductions for individual homeowners, it exempts real estate investors from a new 30% limit on interest deductibility for businesses. “This tax plan would turn America from a nation of property owners into a nation of tenants renting from private equity-backed landlords,” argues Vishal Garg, CEO of Better Mortgage, an online mortgage lender focused on Millennials. “Why should corporate landlords get the deduction if your consumer homebuyer can’t?”

Another change is to the provision that allows homeowners to exclude from their taxable income up to $250,000 in capital gains ($500,000 for married taxpayers) from a sale of their primary residence. Under the plan, to qualify for this break, homeowners must have owned and lived in the home for at least five of the last eight years. Currently the rule is two of the last five. Taxpayer use of the exclusion would also be limited to one sale every five years, rather than one every two. In addition, under the house bill, you begin to lose the gains exemption if adjusted gross income (in a look-back period) exceeded $500,000 if married or $250,000 if single.

Expensive markets would also be hit by the proposal to cap the deduction for property on a home at $10,000. Currently all state and local taxes are deductible in the ordinary tax (although not in the alternative minimum tax, which would be eliminated by the house bill). In the lead up to the bill’s release, local tax treatment was one of the most contentious issues. Originally on the chopping block, property taxes were spared after a revolt from Republican lawmakers from high-tax states like New York, where the effective property tax rate is 1.38% of a property’s value, and New Jersey, where the effective rate is 2.13%.

The compromise, however, did little to quell real estate industry anger or investor jitters. (It is also unclear how many House Republicans from high tax states will continue to oppose the bill because of the $10,000 cap and because state and local income taxes wouldn’t be deductible at all.)

Posted in Mortgages, National Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 43 Comments

The push for $12,500.

From the Washington Examiner:

New Jersey Rep. Tom MacArthur wants cap on property tax deduction lifted in tax bill

A key Republican lawmaker said Thursday that he wants to lift the new tax bill’s cap on property tax deductions, a critical negotiating point as the House strives for swift legislative action.

Rep. Tom MacArthur of New Jersey said he wants the cap on state and local property tax deductions lifted from $10,000 in the first draft of the bill to $12,500.

The $10,000 cap was a compromise between leadership, who had initially proposed to do away with state and local deductions altogether, and members from high-tax states such as New York and New Jersey, who raised concerns that eliminating the break could hurt their constituents.

“I’m trying to get to yes,” MacArthur said off the House floor. He has helped lead negotiations among blue-state representatives, leadership and the Trump administration over the cutting of state and local tax breaks, one of a handful of factors that could sink the bill in the House.

MacArthur said, though, that he would try to negotiate changes to the bill to vote for it.

“There’s a lot of good in the bill. I think we’ve got to try to improve these couple of areas so we don’t discourage homeowership in certain states,” he said, adding that “I’m not interested sitting on the sideline shooting spitballs at everyone else” by ruling out a “yes” vote.

Other blue-state representatives similarly expressed a desire to support the bill, even while registering concern over the property tax provisions.

“I hope that improvements can be made,” said New Jersey Rep. Leonard Lance. Like MacArthur, Lance voted against the House GOP fiscal 2018 budget to express opposition to the plan to eliminate state and local deductions.

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 106 Comments

Camden on the mend?

From WHYY:

Camden on the rise? New data show poverty is falling

Ken Hammon’s driveway says it all.

About halfway down Tuckahoe Road in South Camden, sits the black Mustang the 31-year-old bought thanks to a life-changing job at Holtec International. The energy company recently opened a $300 million plant that manufactures small nuclear reactors in the city.

The tidy, three-bedroom house the muscle car is parked next to? Hammon bought that, too, after being hired as a welder last fall.

Roughly a year ago, he was a college student with two jobs, struggling to pay rent — his piece of the American Dream nowhere in sight.

“This is the first time, ever, I’ve really seen my mother just overjoyed. She’s always had really strong beliefs in me, but now it’s unbelievable,” Hammon said during a recent interview, just before heading to work the second shift at Holtec.

Hammon is part of a wave of new hires across Camden between 2013 and 2016. According to federal labor statistics, 541 new positions were created in the city during that three-year span.
It’s no boom, but these jobs do help explain a noteworthy shift in Camden — poverty appears to be falling.
The most recent estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau show the city’s poverty rate fell 10 percent last year compared with the previous five-year average.

Camden’s poverty rate is now roughly 30 percent, the lowest it’s been in more than a decade.
“Whether you’re looking at Camden County at large or the city itself, there’s been what I would describe as healthy growth in income,” said veteran labor economist Mark Price, a staffer at the Keystone Research Center in Harrisburg.

The census estimates some of Camden’s poorest residents are making about $2,000 more a year than just a few years ago. A big boost if, for example, you’re earning $12,000, the federal poverty line for a single person.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, New Jersey Real Estate | 188 Comments

MarketNews October

From Otteau Group:

MarketNews October

After four consecutive months of increases, home purchase contracts in New Jersey were basically unchanged during the month of September, increasing by just 0.4%. This is compared to a 12% increase one year ago in September of 2016. Still, the number of purchase contracts last month was the most for the month of September since 2005, signaling continued high demand. Overall, home sales have increased in New Jersey by 5% y-t-d.

While the number of home sales has increased across all price ranges this year, the largest gain has occurred for luxury homes priced over $2.5-Million, rising by 14%, while homes priced under $600,000 have seen the smallest increases. It’s important to note that home sales in excess of $2.5-Million are increasing for the first time in more than a decade. The gains for more expensive homes is attributable to rising confidence among higher income households while slower growth in lower priced homes is the direct result of shrinking inventory.

Shifting to the supply side of the equation, the supply of homes being offered for sale remains constricted, which is limiting choices for home buyers. The number of homes being offered for sale today in New Jersey has fallen to the fewest of the past 12 years, having declined by 6,000 over the past year. This is also about 31,000 (-42%) fewer homes on the market compared to the cyclical high in 2011. Today’s unsold inventory equates to 4.7 months of sales (non-seasonally adjusted), which is lower than one year ago, when it was 5.4 months.

Currently, the majority (90%) of New Jersey’s 21 counties have less than 8.0 months of supply, which is a balance point for home prices. Hudson County continues to experience the strongest market conditions in the state with just 3.3 months of supply, followed by Middlesex, Essex, Union, Monmouth, Passaic, Bergen and Morris Counties, which all have fewer than 4.5 months of supply. The counties with the largest amount of unsold inventory (6 months or greater) are concentrated in the southern portion of the state including Cumberland (6.1), Cape May (6.8), Atlantic (7.5) and Salem (9.8), however, these counties are also beginning to exhibit strengthening conditions.

Posted in Economics, New Jersey Real Estate | 94 Comments

Home Builders turn against tax plan

From the Washington Post:

Home builders raise a hammer, try to smash the GOP tax bill

The Republican effort to overhaul the tax code suffered a bruising setback over the weekend when a powerful corporate interest group came out against the proposal just days ahead of House leaders’ planned release of the legislation to the public.

President Donald Trump and GOP leaders are casting the measure as a once-in-a-generation rewrite of the federal tax code, one they say will stimulate the economy, create millions of jobs and give voters a reason to stick with their party in next year’s midterm elections. Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, is scheduled to reveal the House version of the bill on Wednesday.

A discouraging clue emerged for House Republicans on Saturday, when the National Association of Home Builders came out against the bill after Brady informed the group’s chief executive about key details.

“We will do everything we can to defeat this thing,” said Jerry Howard, chief executive officer of the National Association of Home Builders.

For Trump and House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis., the stakes couldn’t be higher. With the approach of the end of their first year controlling the White House and Congress, and the failure of health-care legislation still fresh, Republicans are desperate to post a win before next year’s midterm election cycle begins in earnest. By many of their own accounts, failure to pass tax legislation could lead to an electoral bloodbath, and the end of Ryan’s political career, in 2018.

Much of the pressure, and spotlight, will fall on Brady. A bare-pated, unfailingly sunny former Chamber of Commerce executive who is largely unknown outside of Washington after 20 years on Capitol Hill, Brady’s challenge is to build consensus while fellow Republican lawmakers, corporate lobbyists and perhaps even Trump himself pick the bill apart.

Howard said home builders like other parts of the tax plan, such as tax cuts for businesses and lower rates for many families. But he feared that other changes could tip the housing industry into a recession. He was particularly concerned about ideas to eliminate the federal deduction for state and local taxes and doubling the standard deduction, which could remove incentives for all but the “very wealthy” to deduct their mortgage interest – and have a chilling effect on homeownership.

After Brady communicated that the changes would not be made, top NAHB officials held an emergency conference call on Saturday and agreed unanimously to oppose the bill after months of reserving judgment, a spokesman for the organization said. Now, the group is preparing a public campaign against the bill, with plans to mobilize members in congressional districts across the country.

Posted in New Development, New Jersey Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 139 Comments

Can small business thrive in NJ?

From the Star Ledger:

Which are the hottest counties in N.J. for new business?

Hank Sauce is made in small batches by hand, when the restaurant in Sea Isle City run by Josh Jaspan and his two former college roommates closes for the off season.

Soon, however, Jaspan, Matt Pattaluga, and Brian “Hank” Ruxton—a chef who created the hot sauce bearing his name, expect to open a production facility in Millville’s Urban Enterprise Zone with the help of a $695,000 loan backed by the Small Business Administration.

Jaspan, who said the money will provide working capital for their growing operation, said they faced limited options when they looked to finance their expansion.

“When it comes time to grow and all the options are on the table, you can give equity and give up part of your company to whoever wants to invest, or you can go to the bank and try to get a loan,” he said.

Jaspan had a lot of company this year. The SBA said it approved a record $869 million in loans to New Jersey small business owners in fiscal year 2017, which ended Sept. 30.

“We’ve reached out more, and the better economy has led to more spending,” said John Blackstock, the SBA’s New Jersey District deputy director.

Overall, the agency approved 2,326 loans, compared to 1,755 loans totaling $806 million in the last fiscal year. Officials said it was the first time since 2008 that the New Jersey office approved more than 2,000 loans.

He said 18 of 21 counties saw increases in the number of loans that were made. “It tells us our lending programs are making an impact,” said Blackstock.

Posted in Economics, New Development, New Jersey Real Estate | 54 Comments

Time to take a vacation … on the house!

From CNBC:

Home equity loans set to soar along with home prices

Ever since the epic housing crash of the last decade, homeowners have been incredibly conservative with their housing debt.

Home prices rose, at first slowly and now quite dramatically, yet owners held back on taking out all that new-found equity. That is about to change — by a lot.

About 10 million homeowners are expected to take out home equity lines of credit in the next four years, according to a new report from TransUnion.

That would be more than double the amount of originations between 2012 and 2016. This comes as the amount of available home equity has jumped to more than $13 trillion today from $6.3 trillion in 2011, the bottom of the last housing crash.

HELOCs, which are often loans after the primary mortgage, usually rise and fall along with home equity, but that didn’t happen following the recession. There was a significant pullback in lending, as banks considered the loans too risky and too difficult to originate, given the stricter underwriting guidelines that were implemented.

Some lenders got out of the business because there just wasn’t enough demand. Borrowers simply didn’t have the equity because home values had fallen so far. Even as values rose, borrowers didn’t rush in immediately.

Still, the demand will likely be there, as consumers use their home equity for several reasons. First, they will use it to repair and renovate their homes. With the housing supply so low, more homeowners are staying where they are, unable to find or afford a move-up home. Instead, they add on or upgrade what they have. Remodeling activity has been rising steadily and more dramatically this year.

“Recent strengthening of the U.S. economy, tight housing inventories, and healthy home equity gains are all working to boost home improvement activity,” Chris Herbert, managing director of the Joint Center for Housing Studies, wrote in a recent survey.

“Over the coming year, owners are projected to spend in excess of $330 billion on home upgrades and replacements, as well as routine maintenance,” Herbert said.

Posted in Economics, Mortgages, National Real Estate | 116 Comments

What the hell?

From HousingWire:

New home sales 10-year high baffles economists

After hitting a new low in August, new home sales surged in September to their fastest pace in the past decade, according to the latest report released jointly by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Sales of new single-family houses in September surged to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 667,000 sales, the report showed. This is up a full 18.9% from 561,000 new home sales in August and up 17% from 570,000 sales in September 2016. The increase marked the fastest pace of home sales in 10 years.

This sudden increase came much to the shock of economists, who said September would likely see a slight drop in home sales.

“Expectations were for a modest decline in sales as the current sales component of the NAHB’s Housing Market Index slipped in September and purchase applications were down in the MBA’s mortgage applications survey for August,” Nationwide Chief Economist David Berson said, explaining applications tend to be an indicator of sales activity.

However unexpected the news, experts were thrilled, saying this is the news they’ve been waiting to here.

“Now this is the kind of new home sales activity we need and expect to be seeing, especially after what was a pretty weak and disappointing summer selling season made worse by a string of Hurricane disruptions,” Zillow Chief Economist Svenja Gudell said. “And upward revisions to initially reported summer numbers, however modest, only sweeten the news.”

Posted in Demographics, Economics, National Real Estate, New Development | 127 Comments

NJ’s MacArthur throws down the gauntlet

From CNN:

Republican group threatens to block budget over tax deduction fight

Threatening the GOP’s top priority of passing major tax reform, Republican Rep. Tom MacArthur warned Tuesday night that so many House Republicans are frustrated with plans to nix a popular deduction, they could block the budget this week.

“I haven’t done a whip count, but yes, I think there’s enough,” the New Jersey congressman told reporters.

Meanwhile, Republican leaders, who can afford to lose only 22 members of their caucus, are scrambling to find a solution that would get enough Republicans on board to move forward with the budget, which is considered the first step in tax reform.

The Republican tax reform framework proposes eliminating the State and Local Tax deduction (SALT), a popular tax break that affects nearly one-third of filers, letting them deduct levies like state income taxes and property taxes. It’s been in place since the birth of the federal income tax in 1913.

About 30 GOP members represent districts that heavily rely on the deduction, and if they stick together they could derail the resolution.

Republicans from high-tax states like New York, New Jersey, California and Illinois have been negotiating behind the scenes with Republican leaders, hoping to either preserve the deduction or find some sort of compromise.

With just days before the House votes on a budget, MacArthur said he’s disappointed by what he described as a lack of progress in the negotiations.

The lawmaker from New Jersey, which has the highest property tax in the country, is taking issue with language added to the Senate budget that targets deductions like SALT in order to help raise money for tax cuts.

“If the deductibility of SALT is just wholesale gone, I don’t think it can pass the House,” he said.

Posted in New Jersey Real Estate, Politics, Property Taxes | 70 Comments

Automation will reshape America

From MIT Technology Review:

In These Small Cities, AI Advances Could Be Costly

It’s long been clear that urbanization and automated technologies are shaping society, but it hasn’t been obvious how the two forces affect each other.

Until now, perhaps. A new study from MIT’s Media Lab posits that the smaller the city, the greater the impact it faces from automation. The finding, they say, could encourage legislators to pay special attention to workers in smaller cities and offer them support services.

Other researchers have attempted to measure the effect of technology on employment in cities, but the Media Lab authors, who have identified which jobs and skills tend to be more prevalent in smaller cities and larger ones, claim to be the first to explain why different U.S. cities are more susceptible (or resilient) to technological unemployment. (Though the authors did not define “small” and “large” in their paper, they say that cities with fewer than 100,000 inhabitants will experience more disruption.)

They say that bigger cities have a disproportionately large number of jobs for people who do cognitive and analytical tasks, such as software developers and financial analysts—occupations that are less likely to be disrupted by automation. Smaller cities have a disproportionate amount of routine clerical work, such as cashier and food service jobs, which are more susceptible.

The five U.S. metropolitan areas that are expected to experience the least job impact from automation are San Jose, Sunnyvale, and Santa Clara, California; Washington, D.C., and Arlington and Alexandria, Virginia; Trenton, New Jersey; Boston and Cambridge, Massachusetts; and Durham and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. All of those regions have large populations and high proportions of skilled technical and managerial occupations, particularly technology jobs. The metro areas deemed most at risk (among them Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Elkhart County, Indiana; and Punta Gorda, Florida) rely on industries, such as agriculture and tourism, that have already been disrupted by technology and will probably continue to be.

“Big cities provide greater opportunities for synergies among creative, highly technical people, and that’s why they attract them,” explains Iyad Rahwan, an associate professor at MIT and the corresponding author of the paper. “The other dynamic is that cashiers and waiters are less idle in big cities than small cities, so large cities need fewer of them in proportion to their size.” As a result, he says, large cities have fewer routinized occupations that are more likely to be automated and relatively more technical and managerial occupations, which are less likely to be impacted by automation.

Posted in Demographics, Economics, Employment, National Real Estate | 139 Comments